Suppr超能文献

环丙沙星的脂质体包封提高了对高毒力土拉弗朗西斯菌Schu S4菌株的防护能力。

Liposome encapsulation of ciprofloxacin improves protection against highly virulent Francisella tularensis strain Schu S4.

作者信息

Hamblin Karleigh A, Armstrong Stuart J, Barnes Kay B, Davies Carwyn, Wong Jonathan P, Blanchard James D, Harding Sarah V, Simpson Andrew J H, Atkins Helen S

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jun;58(6):3053-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02555-13. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

Abstract

Liposome-encapsulated ciprofloxacin for inhalation (CFI) was investigated as a putative postexposure therapeutic for two strains of Francisella tularensis. The efficacies of oral ciprofloxacin and intranasally instilled CFI could not be distinguished in a mouse model of infection with the F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS), where a single dose of either formulation offered full protection against a lethal challenge. However, mouse studies with the more virulent Schu S4 strain of F. tularensis demonstrated that a higher level of protection against a lethal aerosol infection is provided by CFI than by oral ciprofloxacin. In addition, using this infection model, it was possible to discriminate the efficacy of intranasally instilled CFI from that of aerosolized CFI, with aerosolized CFI providing full protection after just a single dose. The improved efficacy of CFI compared to oral ciprofloxacin is likely due to the high sustained concentrations of ciprofloxacin in the lung. In summary, CFI may be a promising therapy, perhaps enabling the prophylactic regimen to be shortened, for use in the event of a deliberate release of F. tularensis. The prophylactic efficacy of CFI against other biological warfare (BW) threat agents also warrants investigation.

摘要

对脂质体包裹的环丙沙星吸入剂(CFI)作为两株土拉弗朗西斯菌暴露后治疗药物进行了研究。在土拉弗朗西斯菌活疫苗株(LVS)感染的小鼠模型中,口服环丙沙星和经鼻滴注CFI的疗效没有差异,单剂量的任何一种制剂均可提供完全保护以抵御致死性攻击。然而,对毒性更强的土拉弗朗西斯菌Schu S4菌株进行的小鼠研究表明,CFI比口服环丙沙星对致死性气溶胶感染提供更高水平的保护。此外,使用该感染模型,可以区分经鼻滴注CFI和气溶胶化CFI的疗效,气溶胶化CFI单剂量给药后即可提供完全保护。与口服环丙沙星相比,CFI疗效提高可能是由于环丙沙星在肺中持续保持高浓度。总之,CFI可能是一种有前景的治疗方法,或许能缩短预防方案,用于应对土拉弗朗西斯菌的蓄意释放事件。CFI对其他生物战(BW)威胁病原体的预防效果也值得研究。

相似文献

2

引用本文的文献

2
Non-vaccinal prophylaxis of tularemia.土拉菌病的非疫苗预防
Front Microbiol. 2024 Nov 28;15:1507469. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1507469. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
Measurement of the respiratory volumes of laboratory animals.实验动物呼吸量的测量。
Am J Physiol. 1947 Jul 1;150(1):70-7. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1947.150.1.70.
5
Tularemia: current diagnosis and treatment options.兔热病:当前的诊断与治疗选择
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008 Apr;6(2):231-40. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.2.231.
10
Studies on the variation of Bacterium tularense.土拉弗朗西斯菌变异的研究。
J Bacteriol. 1951 May;61(5):557-69. doi: 10.1128/jb.61.5.557-569.1951.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验