• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

把握界限:冒险者与非冒险者之间的感知差异。

Knowing where to draw the line: perceptual differences between risk-takers and non-risk-takers.

作者信息

Biggs Adam T, Stey Paul C, Davoli Christopher C, Lapsley Daniel, Brockmole James R

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e91880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091880. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0091880
PMID:24637945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3956723/
Abstract

There are a variety of reasons someone might engage in risky behaviors, such as perceived invulnerability to harm or a belief that negative outcomes are more likely for others than for oneself. However, these risk-taking biases are often measured at a decision-making level or from the developmental perspective. Here we assessed whether or not risk-taking influenced perceptual judgments associated with risk. Participants were provided an objective task to measure individual differences in the perception of physical dimensions (i.e., actual size of a balloon) versus the perception of risk (i.e., size at which the balloon would explode). Our results show that specific differences in risk-taking personalities produce specific differences in perceptual judgments about risk, but do not affect perception of the actual dimensions. Thus, risk-takers differ from non-risk-takers in the perceptual estimations they make about risks, and therefore may be more likely to engage in dangerous or uncertain behaviors because they perceive risks differently.

摘要

人们可能会有各种原因去从事冒险行为,比如觉得自己不会受到伤害,或者认为负面结果对他人的可能性比对自己更大。然而,这些冒险偏差通常是在决策层面或从发展的角度来衡量的。在这里,我们评估了冒险行为是否会影响与风险相关的感知判断。我们给参与者提供了一项客观任务,以测量他们在对物理维度(即气球的实际大小)的感知与对风险的感知(即气球爆炸时的大小)方面的个体差异。我们的结果表明,冒险性格的特定差异会在对风险的感知判断上产生特定差异,但不会影响对实际维度的感知。因此,冒险者与非冒险者在对风险的感知估计上存在差异,所以他们可能更有可能从事危险或不确定的行为,因为他们对风险的感知不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a7/3956723/7583d125b6cc/pone.0091880.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a7/3956723/7583d125b6cc/pone.0091880.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a7/3956723/7583d125b6cc/pone.0091880.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowing where to draw the line: perceptual differences between risk-takers and non-risk-takers.把握界限:冒险者与非冒险者之间的感知差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e91880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091880. eCollection 2014.
2
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
3
Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically.采取他人视角的人行为更刻板。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Aug;95(2):404-19. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.404.
4
Being responsible versus acting responsibly: effects of agency and risk taking on responsibility judgments.承担责任与负责任地行动:能动性和冒险行为对责任判断的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Apr;55(2):102-14. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12111. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
5
The ability of adolescents to predict future outcome. Part I: Assessing predictive abilities.青少年预测未来结果的能力。第一部分:评估预测能力。
Adolescence. 1993 Fall;28(111):533-55.
6
Reckless gambles and responsible ventures: Racialized prototypes of risk-taking.鲁莽的赌博和负责任的冒险:冒险行为的种族化原型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Feb;122(2):202-221. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000287. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
Is the Peer Presence Effect on Heightened Adolescent Risky Decision-Making only Present in Males?同伴在场效应对青少年高风险决策的影响是否仅存在于男性中?
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Mar;49(3):693-705. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01179-9. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
8
Knowing the risk: relationships between risk behaviour and health knowledge.了解风险:风险行为与健康知识之间的关系。
Public Health. 2001 Jan;115(1):54-61. doi: 10.1038/sj/ph/1900728.
9
Adolescent (in)vulnerability.青少年的(不)易损性。
Am Psychol. 1993 Feb;48(2):102-16. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.48.2.102.
10
Bold or reckless? The impact of workplace risk-taking on attributions and expected outcomes.大胆还是鲁莽?工作场所冒险行为对归因和预期结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0228672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228672. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Armed and attentive: holding a weapon can bias attentional priorities in scene viewing.武装且专注:手持武器会在场景观察中使注意力优先级产生偏差。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1715-24. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0538-6.
2
Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered.远程使用工具压缩感知距离:真实的、想象的和记忆中的。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):80-9. doi: 10.1037/a0024981. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
3
Reduced sensitivity to visual looming inflates the risk posed by speeding vehicles when children try to cross the road.
对视觉逼近的敏感度降低会增加儿童在试图过马路时因超速车辆而面临的风险。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):429-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400917. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
4
Invulnerability and the intention to drink and drive: an application of the theory of planned behavior.不可侵犯性与酒后驾车意图:计划行为理论的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
5
Subjective invulnerability, optimism bias and adjustment in emerging adulthood.主观不可侵犯性、乐观偏差与成年初显期的调整。
J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Aug;39(8):847-57. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9409-9. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
6
Big people, little world: the body influences size perception.高大之人,微小世界:身体影响尺寸感知。
Perception. 2009;38(12):1782-95. doi: 10.1068/p6437.
7
Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it.工具的使用会影响对距离的感知,但前提是你打算使用它。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):880-8. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.880.
8
Perceptions of risk and vulnerability.
J Adolesc Health. 2002 Jul;31(1 Suppl):10-27. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00412-3.
9
Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).冒险行为测量方法的评估:气球模拟风险任务(BART)。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Jun;8(2):75-84. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.8.2.75.
10
Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: do Easterners really expect the worst and Westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events?乐观与悲观偏差中的文化差异:在预测未来生活事件时,东方人真的预期最糟情况而西方人真的预期最好情况吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Sep;81(3):476-91.