• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不可侵犯性与酒后驾车意图:计划行为理论的应用。

Invulnerability and the intention to drink and drive: an application of the theory of planned behavior.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, University of Macau, Av. Padre Tomas Pereira, Taipa, Macao.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.011
PMID:20728602
Abstract

The present study aims at an examination, based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), of the psychological antecedents of young Chinese people's intentions to drive after drinking. One hundred and twenty-four licensed drivers (aged from 19 to 35 years) successfully completed an online questionnaire. Using path analysis, we found the most proximal predictors of intention to be attitudes and perceived behavioral control, whereas invulnerability as well as subjective norms indirectly influenced intention by promoting favorable attitudes toward and greater perceived behavioral control over driving after alcohol use. The total explained variances in the intention to drink and drive reached 79%. The present findings highlight irrational beliefs of invulnerability and the three TPB components as potentially valid targets for prevention and intervention efforts against drinking and driving among young Chinese drivers.

摘要

本研究旨在基于计划行为理论(TPB),考察年轻中国人酒后驾车意图的心理前因。124 名有驾照的司机(年龄在 19 岁至 35 岁之间)成功完成了在线问卷。通过路径分析,我们发现意图的最直接预测因素是态度和感知行为控制,而不可侵犯性以及主观规范通过促进对酒后驾车的有利态度和更大的感知行为控制,间接地影响了意图。对酒后驾车意图的总解释方差达到 79%。本研究结果强调了不可侵犯性的非理性信念以及 TPB 的三个组成部分,它们可能是针对年轻中国司机酒后驾车预防和干预措施的有效目标。

相似文献

1
Invulnerability and the intention to drink and drive: an application of the theory of planned behavior.不可侵犯性与酒后驾车意图:计划行为理论的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
2
Problem gambling of Chinese college students: application of the theory of planned behavior.中国大学生赌博问题:计划行为理论的应用。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Jun;28(2):315-24. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9250-4.
3
Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand binge drinking: the importance of beliefs for developing interventions.采用计划行为理论理解狂饮行为:了解干预措施制定中信念的重要性。
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 Feb;17(1):1-17. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2010.02010.x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
Prediction of Chinese drivers' intentions to park illegally in emergency lanes: An application of the theory of planned behavior.中国驾驶员在应急车道违法停车意图的预测:计划行为理论的应用
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(6):629-636. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1479062. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior in the Prediction of Alcohol-Induced Blackout Intention and Frequency.计划行为理论在预测酒精性昏迷意图和频率中的检验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jan;44(1):225-232. doi: 10.1111/acer.14232. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
Young adults' social drinking as explained by an augmented theory of planned behaviour: the roles of prototypes, willingness, and gender.年轻人的社交饮酒行为可以用扩展的计划行为理论来解释:原型、意愿和性别所扮演的角色。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;15(Pt 3):561-81. doi: 10.1348/135910709X476558. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
7
Driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol: Predicting the intentions of young drivers.吸毒或酒驾:预测年轻司机的意图。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):97-101. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1869953. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
8
An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to sorority alcohol consumption.计划行为理论在姐妹会饮酒行为中的应用。
Addict Behav. 2008 Apr;33(4):538-51. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.11.002. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
9
The role of context and timeframe in moderating relationships within the theory of planned behaviour.语境和时间框架在调节计划行为理论中关系的作用。
Psychol Health. 2011 Sep;26(9):1225-40. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.572260. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
10
Factors influencing drink driving intention among motorcyclists in Vietnam.影响越南摩托车手酒驾意图的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(6):445-451. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2223328. Epub 2023 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Mediating Effect of Danger Invulnerability in the Relationship Between Sensation Seeking and Gambling Among University Students.危险无懈可击感在大学生感觉寻求与赌博关系中的中介作用
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Mar;40(1):219-235. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10179-7. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
2
Predicting Errors, Violations, and Safety Participation Behavior at Nuclear Power Plants.预测核电厂的错误、违规和安全参与行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 4;17(15):5613. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155613.
3
The Influence of Sleep Quality, Vigilance, and Sleepiness on Driving-Related Cognitive Abilities: A Comparison between Young and Older Adults.
睡眠质量、警觉性和嗜睡对驾驶相关认知能力的影响:年轻人与老年人的比较。
Brain Sci. 2020 May 28;10(6):327. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10060327.
4
Still careless: findings from a cross-sectional study of young pedestrians' risky road crossing behaviors.依旧粗心:一项关于年轻行人危险过马路行为的横断面研究结果
Arch Public Health. 2020 May 18;78:44. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00421-2. eCollection 2020.
5
Application of Health Belief Model to Practice of Responsible Gambling.健康信念模式在负责任赌博实践中的应用。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):1047-1062. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09871-y.
6
Examining interactions within the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of intentions to engage in cannabis-related driving behaviors.考察计划行为理论内部的相互作用对意图从事与大麻相关的驾驶行为的预测。
J Am Coll Health. 2020 May-Jun;68(4):374-380. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1557197. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
The relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes towards drunk driving.对酒驾的内隐和外显态度之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 22;13(10):e0206124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206124. eCollection 2018.
8
The associations among prior drinking consequences, subjective evaluations, and subsequent alcohol outcomes.既往饮酒后果、主观评价与后续酒精相关结果之间的关联。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 May;30(3):367-76. doi: 10.1037/adb0000166.
9
Alcohol and hospitalized road traffic injuries in the Philippines.菲律宾的酒精与住院道路交通伤害
Yale J Biol Med. 2014 Sep 3;87(3):307-19. eCollection 2014 Sep.
10
Knowing where to draw the line: perceptual differences between risk-takers and non-risk-takers.把握界限:冒险者与非冒险者之间的感知差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e91880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091880. eCollection 2014.