ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles, , Building C/Campus Erasme CP 602, 808, Route de Lennik, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 17;369(1641):20130282. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0282. Print 2014 May 5.
Is our visual experience of the world graded or dichotomous? Opposite pre-theoretical intuitions apply in different cases. For instance, when looking at a scene, one has a distinct sense that our experience has a graded character: one cannot say that there is no experience of contents that fall outside the focus of attention, but one cannot say that there is full awareness of such contents either. By contrast, when performing a visual detection task, our sense of having perceived the stimulus or not exhibits a more dichotomous character. Such issues have recently been the object of intense debate because different theoretical frameworks make different predictions about the graded versus dichotomous character of consciousness. Here, we review both relevant empirical findings as well as the associated theories (i.e. local recurrent processing versus global neural workspace theory). Next, we attempt to reconcile such contradictory theories by suggesting that level of processing is an often-ignored but highly relevant dimension through which we can cast a novel look at existing empirical findings. Thus, using a range of different stimuli, tasks and subjective scales, we show that processing low-level, non-semantic content results in graded visual experience, whereas processing high-level semantic content is experienced in a more dichotomous manner. We close by comparing our perspective with existing proposals, focusing in particular on the partial awareness hypothesis.
我们对世界的视觉体验是有级的还是二分的?相反的前理论直觉适用于不同的情况。例如,当观察一个场景时,人们有一种明显的感觉,即我们的体验具有有级的特征:不能说没有注意焦点之外的内容的体验,但也不能说对这些内容有完全的意识。相比之下,当执行视觉检测任务时,我们是否感知到刺激的感觉表现出更二分的特征。这些问题最近成为激烈辩论的对象,因为不同的理论框架对意识的有级与二分特征做出了不同的预测。在这里,我们回顾了相关的实证发现以及相关的理论(即局部递归处理与全局神经工作空间理论)。接下来,我们试图通过提出处理水平是一个经常被忽视但高度相关的维度来调和这些相互矛盾的理论,通过这个维度,我们可以对现有的实证发现进行新的审视。因此,我们使用一系列不同的刺激、任务和主观量表,表明处理低水平、非语义内容会产生有级的视觉体验,而处理高水平语义内容则以更二分的方式体验。最后,我们将我们的观点与现有的建议进行比较,特别关注部分意识假说。