ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Building C / Campus Erasme, CP 602, 808, Route de Lennik, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium; Center for Research in Cognitive Neurosciences (CRCN), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 191, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium; Consciousness, Cognition and Computation Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles CP 191, Avenue F.-D. Roosevelt, 50, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
Is visual awareness graded or binary? Experimental work has provided support for both possibilities, leading to two coexisting but contradictory theoretical accounts. Here we propose a promising candidate factor through which to integrate both accounts: the depth of stimulus processing required by the task. We compared color identification (a low-level task) with numerical judgements (a high-level task) performed on the very same colored number stimuli. Psychophysical curves were analyzed for both objective discrimination performance and subjective visibility ratings on a trial-by trial basis. We observed a graded relationship between stimulus duration and visibility in the low-level task, but a more non-linear relationship in the high-level task. Both patterns of results have previously been consistently associated with the graded and the dichotomous account, respectively. Follow-up experiments that manipulate the level of processing can further unify previously inconsistent results, thus integrating two major theories of visual awareness.
视觉意识是分级的还是二元的?实验工作为这两种可能性提供了支持,导致了两种并存但相互矛盾的理论解释。在这里,我们提出了一个有希望的候选因素,通过它可以整合这两种解释:任务所需的刺激处理深度。我们比较了在相同颜色数字刺激上进行的颜色识别(低级任务)和数值判断(高级任务)。我们对客观辨别性能和主观可见性评分进行了逐次分析。我们在低级任务中观察到刺激持续时间和可见性之间的分级关系,但在高级任务中则呈现出更非线性的关系。这两种结果模式以前都分别与分级和二分解释一致。后续的实验可以进一步统一以前不一致的结果,从而整合视觉意识的两个主要理论。