Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Manchester, 2nd Floor, Zochonis Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK,
J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Sep;44(9):2127-36. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2085-y.
A systematic review was conducted to examine the efficacy of a range of treatments for autistic catatonia. The review identified 22 relevant papers, reporting a total of 28 cases including both adult and paediatric patients. Treatment methods included electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), medication, behavioural and sensory interventions. Quality assessment found the standard of the existing literature to be generally poor, with particular limitations in treatment description and outcome measurement. There is some limited evidence to support the use of ECT, high dose lorazepam and behavioural interventions for people with autistic catatonia. However, there is a need for controlled, high-quality trials. Reporting of side effects and adverse events should also be improved, in order to better evaluate the safety of these treatments.
系统评价旨在研究一系列治疗自闭症性紧张症的疗效。该评价纳入了 22 篇相关文献,共报道了 28 例成年和儿童患者。治疗方法包括电休克疗法(ECT)、药物治疗、行为和感官干预。质量评估发现,现有文献的标准普遍较差,尤其在治疗描述和结果测量方面存在局限性。有一些有限的证据支持使用 ECT、高剂量劳拉西泮和行为干预治疗自闭症性紧张症。但是,仍需要进行对照、高质量的试验。还应改善不良反应和不良事件的报告,以更好地评估这些治疗方法的安全性。