• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达比加群获批第一年期间在FDA不良事件报告系统中对其出血不良反应报告的评估。

Evaluation of dabigatran bleeding adverse reaction reports in the FDA adverse event reporting system during the first year of approval.

作者信息

McConeghy Kevin W, Bress Adam, Qato Dima M, Wing Coady, Nutescu Edith A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Jun;34(6):561-9. doi: 10.1002/phar.1415. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1002/phar.1415
PMID:24644100
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Evaluate dabigatran adverse event reports with a reported bleeding event and/or reported fatal outcome compared with warfarin.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified reports from October 1, 2010, through December 31, 2011, in the United States listing dabigatran or warfarin as the primary suspected agent. Bleeding events and related outcomes were determined. A bleeding-related mortality rate was calculated based on national dabigatran treatment data.

RESULTS

Dabigatran was the primary suspected agent in 9029 adverse reports. Of these, 2347 (26%) were bleeding events; a fatal outcome was reported in 348 (15%) of the bleeding events. In comparison, warfarin was the suspected agent in 2038 reports, of which 647 (32%) were reported as bleeding events. Among the warfarin bleeding reports, 46 (7.1%) reported a fatal outcome. Based on national dabigatran use and adverse bleed reports with fatal outcomes, we estimate a lower bound of 150 bleeding-related fatalities per 100,000 dabigatran patient-years. Because of underreporting bias, these estimates represent a lower bound on the population bleeding mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

Reports from FAERS are subject to significant bias but suggest that fatal outcomes among dabigatran reports are higher in clinical practice than they were in controlled clinical trials.

摘要

研究目的

评估达比加群与华法林相比,有出血事件报告和/或致命结局报告的不良事件报告情况。

设计

对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库进行回顾性分析。

测量与主要结果

我们确定了2010年10月1日至2011年12月31日期间美国列出达比加群或华法林为主要可疑药物的报告。确定了出血事件及相关结局。根据全国达比加群治疗数据计算出血相关死亡率。

结果

在9029份不良报告中,达比加群是主要可疑药物。其中,2347份(26%)为出血事件;在这些出血事件中,348份(15%)报告有致命结局。相比之下,在2038份报告中,华法林是可疑药物,其中647份(32%)报告为出血事件。在华法林出血报告中,46份(7.1%)报告有致命结局。根据全国达比加群使用情况及有致命结局的不良出血报告,我们估计每100,000达比加群患者年有150例出血相关死亡的下限。由于报告偏倚,这些估计值代表了总体出血死亡率的下限。

结论

FAERS的报告存在显著偏倚,但表明在临床实践中,达比加群报告中的致命结局高于对照临床试验中的情况。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of dabigatran bleeding adverse reaction reports in the FDA adverse event reporting system during the first year of approval.达比加群获批第一年期间在FDA不良事件报告系统中对其出血不良反应报告的评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Jun;34(6):561-9. doi: 10.1002/phar.1415. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
2
Evaluation of Dabigatran- and Warfarin-Associated Hemorrhagic Events Using the FDA-Adverse Event Reporting System Database Stratified by Age.使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库,按年龄分层评估达比加群和华法林相关出血事件。
Int J Med Sci. 2015 Mar 28;12(4):312-21. doi: 10.7150/ijms.10703. eCollection 2015.
3
Dabigatran-dronedarone interaction in a spontaneous reporting system.达比加群与决奈达隆在自发报告系统中的相互作用。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):414-9. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12218.
4
Bleeding events among new starters and switchers to dabigatran compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation.与华法林相比,房颤患者中新使用达比加群者和换用达比加群者的出血事件。
Am J Med. 2014 Jul;127(7):650-656.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.031. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
5
Risk of bleeding with dabigatran in atrial fibrillation.达比加群酯在心房颤动中的出血风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jan;175(1):18-24. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5398.
6
Management and outcomes of major bleeding during treatment with dabigatran or warfarin.达比加群或华法林治疗期间大出血的管理和结局。
Circulation. 2013 Nov 19;128(21):2325-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002332. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
7
Hemorrhagic complications in emergency department patients who are receiving dabigatran compared with warfarin.与华法林相比,在接受达比加群治疗的急诊科患者中的出血并发症。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):475-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.008.
8
Higher persistence in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran versus warfarin.与华法林相比,达比加群治疗新诊断的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的持续性更高。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):567-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000192. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Stroke prophylaxis with warfarin or dabigatran for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation-cost analysis.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的华法林或达比加群预防中风的成本分析。
Age Ageing. 2012 Sep;41(5):681-4. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs017. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
10
Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial.与华法林相比,达比加群酯在老年和年轻房颤患者中使用 2 剂的出血风险:随机长期抗凝治疗评估(RE-LY)试验分析。
Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(21):2363-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747. Epub 2011 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Essentials: A Guide to Understanding, Applying, and Interpreting Adverse Event Data Reported to FAERS.美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)要点:解读、应用及阐释向FAERS报告的不良事件数据指南
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Sep;118(3):567-582. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3701. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
The INGENIOUS trial: Impact of pharmacogenetic testing on adverse events in a pragmatic clinical trial.INGENIOUS 试验:药物遗传学检测对实用临床试验中不良事件的影响。
Pharmacogenomics J. 2023 Nov;23(6):169-177. doi: 10.1038/s41397-023-00315-w. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
3
Characterization and corroboration of safety signals identified from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, 2008-19: cross sectional study.
从美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统中识别出的安全信号的特征描述和证实,2008-2019 年:横断面研究。
BMJ. 2022 Oct 5;379:e071752. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071752.
4
Venous sinus thrombosis after the first dose of Pfizer BioNTech vaccine.接种辉瑞-生物科技疫苗第一针后出现静脉窦血栓形成。
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 May 20;15(5):e247493. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-247493.
5
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis is not Significantly Linked to COVID-19 Vaccines or Non-COVID Vaccines in a Large Multi-State Health System.在一个大型多州卫生系统中,大脑静脉窦血栓形成与 COVID-19 疫苗或非 COVID 疫苗没有显著关联。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Oct;30(10):105923. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105923. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Clozapine and hematologic adverse reactions: Impact of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program.氯氮平与血液学不良反应:风险评估与降低策略项目的影响
Ment Health Clin. 2020 May 7;10(3):70-75. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2020.05.070. eCollection 2020 May.
7
Adverse reaction profiles of hemorrhagic adverse reactions caused by direct oral anticoagulants analyzed using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库和日本药物不良反应报告(JADER)数据库分析直接口服抗凝剂引起的出血不良反应的不良反应谱。
Int J Med Sci. 2019 Sep 7;16(9):1295-1303. doi: 10.7150/ijms.34629. eCollection 2019.
8
Pharmaceutical industry funding of events for healthcare professionals on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in Australia: an observational study.澳大利亚非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂的医药行业为医疗保健专业人员举办活动的情况:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e030253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030253.
9
Comparison of Safety Profiles of New Oral Anticoagulants with Warfarin Using the Japanese Spontaneous Reporting Database.比较新型口服抗凝药物与华法林在日本自发报告数据库中的安全性特征。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Jul;39(7):665-670. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00788-3.
10
Evaluation of bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants.接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗患者的出血情况评估。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Aug 23;13:325-342. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S121661. eCollection 2017.