Erb Christopher D, Sobel David M
Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 20;9(3):e92285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092285. eCollection 2014.
The present investigation examines the development of children's diagnostic reasoning abilities when such inferences involve belief revision about uncertain potential causes. Four- to 7-year-olds observed an event occur that was due to one of four potential causes. Some of those potential causes were revealed to be efficacious; others were revealed to be inefficacious, but there was always one potential cause presented with unknown efficacy. While all children could make appropriate predictive inferences about this situation, 4- and 5-year-olds were less capable of making correct diagnostic inferences about the cause of the event under these circumstances than older children. We discuss possible mechanisms for this development, as well as speculate on the relation between these findings and literature in children's scientific reasoning.
本研究考察了儿童诊断推理能力的发展情况,其中这类推理涉及对不确定潜在原因的信念修正。4至7岁的儿童观察到一个事件的发生,该事件由四个潜在原因之一导致。其中一些潜在原因被证明是有效的;其他原因被证明是无效的,但总有一个潜在原因的有效性未知。虽然所有儿童都能对这种情况做出适当的预测性推理,但在这种情况下,4岁和5岁的儿童比年龄较大的儿童更难以对事件原因做出正确的诊断性推理。我们讨论了这种发展的可能机制,并推测了这些发现与儿童科学推理文献之间的关系。