Suppr超能文献

上帝不掷骰子:因果决定论与学龄前儿童的因果推理

God does not play dice: causal determinism and preschoolers' causal inferences.

作者信息

Schulz Laura E, Sommerville Jessica

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2006 Mar-Apr;77(2):427-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00880.x.

Abstract

Three studies investigated children's belief in causal determinism. If children are determinists, they should infer unobserved causes whenever observed causes appear to act stochastically. In Experiment 1, 4-year-olds saw a stochastic generative cause and inferred the existence of an unobserved inhibitory cause. Children traded off inferences about the presence of unobserved inhibitory causes and the absence of unobserved generative causes. In Experiment 2, 4-year-olds used the pattern of indeterminacy to decide whether unobserved variables were generative or inhibitory. Experiment 3 suggested that children (4 years old) resist believing that direct causes can act stochastically, although they accept that events can be stochastically associated. Children's deterministic assumptions seem to support inferences not obtainable from other cues.

摘要

三项研究调查了儿童对因果决定论的信念。如果儿童是决定论者,那么每当观察到的原因似乎随机起作用时,他们就应该推断出未被观察到的原因。在实验1中,4岁的儿童看到了一个随机的生成性原因,并推断出存在一个未被观察到的抑制性原因。儿童在关于未被观察到的抑制性原因的存在和未被观察到的生成性原因的不存在的推断之间进行权衡。在实验2中,4岁的儿童利用不确定性模式来决定未被观察到的变量是生成性的还是抑制性的。实验3表明,4岁的儿童虽然接受事件可以随机关联,但他们拒绝相信直接原因可以随机起作用。儿童的确定性假设似乎支持从其他线索无法获得的推断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验