Cohen Lauren W, Zimmerman Sheryl, Reed David, Sloane Philip D, Beeber Anna S, Washington Tiffany, Cagle John G, Gwyther Lisa P
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Aug;33(5):522-40. doi: 10.1177/0733464813505701. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
To better understand the process and outcomes of family involvement for long-term care residents with varying stages of dementia, we analyzed family and staff data for 467 residents of 24 residential care/assisted living and nursing-home settings. Adjusted analyses found that although the amount of family visitation did not significantly vary by resident cognitive status (15 versus 20 visits/month to persons with and without dementia, respectively), the nature of the visit did. Families of cognitively intact residents spent more time in activities related to social and community engagement, such as taking residents on trips and calling and writing letters (p<.001), while families of more impaired residents spent more time on care-related activities, including tasks related to nutrition (p<.027), mobility (p=.001), and discussing care with staff (p=.007), the latter of which was associated with greater burden (p<.001). Staff identified similar patterns but perceived less family involvement.
为了更好地了解不同痴呆阶段的长期护理居民家庭参与的过程和结果,我们分析了24个寄宿护理/辅助生活机构和养老院中467名居民的家庭和工作人员数据。调整后的分析发现,虽然家庭探访次数并未因居民认知状态而有显著差异(痴呆患者和非痴呆患者每月分别为15次和20次探访),但探访的性质有所不同。认知功能完好的居民家庭花更多时间参与与社交和社区参与相关的活动,如带居民出行、打电话和写信(p<0.001),而认知功能受损更严重的居民家庭则花更多时间在与护理相关的活动上,包括与营养相关的任务(p=0.027)、行动能力相关的任务(p=0.001)以及与工作人员讨论护理事宜(p=0.007),后者与更大的负担相关(p<0.001)。工作人员识别出了类似的模式,但认为家庭参与度较低。