Wang Junjun, Wu Jimin, Liu Rongyi, Gao Feng, Hu Haitao, Yin Xinzhen
1Department of Neurology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Int J Neurosci. 2015 Jan;125(1):50-5. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.905777. Epub 2014 May 16.
Transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are divided into anterior and posterior circulation types (AC-TIA, PC-TIA, respectively). In the present study, we sought to evaluate the ABCD2 score for predicting stroke in either AC-TIA or PC-TIA.
We prospectively studied 369 consecutive patients who presented with TIA between June 2009 and December 2012. The 7 d occurrence of stroke after TIA was recorded and correlated with the ABCD2 score with regards to AC-TIA or PC-TIA.
Overall, 273 AC-TIA and 96 PC-TIA patients were recruited. Twenty-one patients with AC-TIA and seven with PC-TIA developed a stroke within the subsequent 7 d (7.7% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.899). The ABCD2 score had a higher predictive value of stroke occurrence in AC-TIA (the AUC was 0.790; 95% CI, 0.677-0.903) than in PC-TIA (the AUC was 0.535; 95% CI, 0.350-0.727) and the z-value of two receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was 2.24 (p = 0.025). AC-TIA resulted in a higher incidence of both unilateral weakness and speech disturbance and longer durations of the symptoms. Inversely, PC-TIA was associated with a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (19.8% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.022). Evaluating each component of scores, age ≥ 60 yr (OR = 7.010, 95% CI 1.599-30.743), unilateral weakness (OR = 3.455, 95% CI 1.131-10.559), and blood pressure (OR = 9.652, 95% CI 2.202-42.308) were associated with stroke in AC-TIA, while in PC-TIA, diabetes mellitus (OR = 9.990, 95% CI 1.895-52.650) was associated with stroke.
In our study, the ABCD2 score could predict the short-term risk of stroke after AC-TIA, but might have limitation for PC-TIA.
短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)分为前循环型和后循环型(分别为AC-TIA、PC-TIA)。在本研究中,我们试图评估ABCD2评分对预测AC-TIA或PC-TIA后发生卒中的价值。
我们对2009年6月至2012年12月期间连续就诊的369例TIA患者进行了前瞻性研究。记录TIA后7天内卒中的发生情况,并将其与AC-TIA或PC-TIA的ABCD2评分进行关联分析。
共纳入273例AC-TIA患者和96例PC-TIA患者。21例AC-TIA患者和7例PC-TIA患者在随后7天内发生了卒中(7.7%对7.3%,p = 0.899)。ABCD2评分对AC-TIA后卒中发生的预测价值高于PC-TIA(AC-TIA的曲线下面积[AUC]为0.790;95%可信区间[CI]为0.677 - 0.903,PC-TIA的AUC为0.535;95%CI为0.350 - 0.727),两条受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的z值为2.24(p = 0.025)。AC-TIA导致单侧无力和言语障碍的发生率更高,症状持续时间更长。相反,PC-TIA与糖尿病的发生率更高相关(19.8%对10.6%,p = 0.022)。评估评分的各个组成部分,年龄≥60岁(比值比[OR] = 7.010,95%CI 1.599 - 30.743)、单侧无力(OR = 3.455,95%CI 1.131 - 10.559)和血压(OR = 9.652,95%CI 2.202 - 42.308)与AC-TIA后的卒中相关,而在PC-TIA中,糖尿病(OR = 9.990,95%CI 1.895 - 52.650)与卒中相关。
在我们的研究中,ABCD2评分可以预测AC-TIA后卒中的短期风险,但对PC-TIA可能有局限性。