• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术和扩大淋巴结清扫术:一项系统评价

Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review.

作者信息

Killeen S, Mannion M, Devaney A, Winter D C

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):577-94. doi: 10.1111/codi.12616.

DOI:10.1111/codi.12616
PMID:24655722
Abstract

AIM

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) and extended lympha-denectomy (EL) have been proposed as safe procedures for improving colon cancer survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after such techniques for colon cancer.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality after CME or EL. Three major databases (PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were searched. The review included original articles reporting outcomes after CME or EL from January 1950 to July 2012.

RESULTS

Twenty-one, predominately retrospective, studies involving 5246 patients (mean age 68.2 years, 56.5% men) were included. Reporting of outcomes was inconsistent. Median follow up was 60 months. The operative mortality rate was 3.2% and the cumulative morbidity rate was 21.5%. The weighted mean local recurrence rate and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 4.5%, 58.1% and 77.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The available data for CME and EL have numerous fundamental limitations that prohibit adoption. Contemporary controlled studies are required before universal recommendation.

摘要

目的

完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)和扩大淋巴结清扫术(EL)已被提出作为改善结肠癌生存结局的安全手术。本研究的目的是评估此类结肠癌手术技术在肿瘤学结局、发病率和死亡率方面的证据。

方法

对文献进行系统回顾,以评估CME或EL术后在肿瘤学结局、发病率和死亡率方面的证据。检索了三个主要数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆)。该综述纳入了1950年1月至2012年7月间报告CME或EL术后结局的原始文章。

结果

纳入了21项研究,主要为回顾性研究,涉及5246例患者(平均年龄68.2岁,男性占56.5%)。结局报告不一致。中位随访时间为60个月。手术死亡率为3.2%,累积发病率为21.5%。加权平均局部复发率以及5年总生存率和无病生存率分别为4.5%、58.1%和77.4%。

结论

CME和EL的现有数据存在许多基本局限性,无法采用。在普遍推荐之前,需要进行当代对照研究。

相似文献

1
Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review.结肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术和扩大淋巴结清扫术:一项系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):577-94. doi: 10.1111/codi.12616.
2
Open compared with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性手术与腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术加中央淋巴结清扫术治疗结肠癌的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;18(7):O224-35. doi: 10.1111/codi.13385.
3
Complete mesocolic excision an assessment of feasibility and outcome.完整结肠系膜切除术:可行性与结果评估
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
4
Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival.完整结肠系膜切除术和中央血管结扎在右半结肠癌中的 D3 淋巴结清扫术:术后结局、肿瘤复发和总生存的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):4945-4955. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08529-4. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review.结直肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术:一项系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/codi.12793.
6
A systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of the evidence on complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with SAGES and ESCP participation.一项在SAGES和ESCP参与下,对右侧结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术证据的系统评价、荟萃分析及GRADE评估。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3466-3473. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11749-7. Epub 2025 May 5.
7
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) impacts survival only for Stage III right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)仅对 III 期右侧结肠癌的生存有影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2024 Dec;33(6):323-333. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2405544. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
8
Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision.沿胚胎学平面进行的结肠癌手术:完整结肠系膜切除术的系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;31(9):1577-94. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2626-2. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
Complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Is D3 lymphadenectomy necessary?完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌:是否有必要行 D3 淋巴结清扫?
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan;26(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/codi.16815. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
10
Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术的右半结肠切除术是安全的,可增加淋巴结检出量并提高生存率:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Oct;25(10):1099-1113. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02471-2. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Radical Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision Offers Similar Results Compared with Open Surgery.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜根治性结肠切除术联合完整结肠系膜切除术的效果相似。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 7;61(7):1231. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071231.
2
Effect of complete mesocolic excision (cme) on long-term survival after right colectomy for cancer: multivariate meta-analysis and restricted mean survival time estimation.完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)对右半结肠癌根治术后长期生存的影响:多变量荟萃分析和限制平均生存时间估计。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Mar 2;409(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03273-4.
3
Should Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Be Offered to Elderly Patients to Treat Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
是否应该为老年患者提供腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术来治疗右侧结肠癌?
Curr Oncol. 2023 May 13;30(5):4979-4989. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30050376.
4
Long-term oncologic outcome of D3 lymph node dissection for clinical stage 2/3 right-sided colon cancer.临床 2/3 期右半结肠癌行 D3 淋巴结清扫的长期肿瘤学结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Feb 15;38(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04310-2.
5
Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resections of Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer.非转移性结肠癌的机器人、腹腔镜和开放性切除术比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Oct 1;66(10):1347-1358. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002637. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
6
Caudal-to-Cranial Approach for Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision in Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.尾到头入路右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Sep;54(3):739-750. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00894-0. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Importance of Arterial Vessel Length for Metastatic Lymph Node Retrieval and Survival in Standardized Left- and Right-Sided Colon Cancer Surgery.动脉血管长度对标准化左、右半结肠癌手术中转移淋巴结检出和生存的重要性。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Sep;54(3):809-819. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00863-7. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
8
Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.根治性右半结肠切除术的淋巴结清扫术和完整结肠系膜切除术的定义和报告:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):846-861. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
9
Updates on Robotic CME for Right Colon Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Review.右半结肠癌机器人结肠系膜切除术的最新进展:一项定性系统评价
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 12;11(6):550. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060550.
10
Complete Mesocolic Excision and D3 Lymphadenectomy versus Conventional Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术与传统结肠癌根治术行 D3 淋巴结清扫的对比:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8823-8837. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10186-9. Epub 2021 Jun 4.