Hardick Justin, Sadiq Sufyan, Perelstein Elizabeth, Peterson Stephen, Rothman Richard, Gaydos Charlotte A
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;79(2):187-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
Waste nasopharyngeal swabs (N = 244) were evaluated by the reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry PLEX-ID Broad Respiratory Virus Surveillance Kit version 2.5 compared to direct fluorescent antibody and xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel for percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity. Sensitivity and specificity were 91% (111/122) and 95.1% (116/122), respectively. Sensitivity by virus, except parainfluenza, was 92.9-100%, and specificity was 99-100%.
将244份鼻咽拭子样本，采用逆转录聚合酶链反应/电喷雾电离质谱PLEX-ID广谱呼吸道病毒监测试剂盒2.5版进行评估，并与直接荧光抗体法和xTAG呼吸道病毒检测板比较，以确定一致性百分比、敏感性和特异性。敏感性和特异性分别为91%（111/122）和95.1%（116/122）。除副流感病毒外，其他病毒的敏感性为92.9%-100%，特异性为99%-100%。
