Suppr超能文献

匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和嗜睡量表对睡眠障碍诊断的效标效度。

Criterion validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale for the diagnosis of sleep disorders.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.

Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2014 Apr;15(4):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To examine criterion validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) using obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD), and narcolepsy as criterion standard. (2) To summarize the evidence for criterion validity of the ESS for the diagnosis of OSA by a meta-analysis that combines the current and previous studies. (3) To investigate the determinants of the PSQI and ESS scores.

METHODS

The PSQI and ESS as well as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which measures anxiety and depression levels, were administered to 367 patients consecutively referred to a sleep clinic. They underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) and the multiple sleep latency test if narcolepsy was suspected.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the ESS and PSQI (and its subscale) were <0.9, meaning that these questionnaires were not highly accurate for predicting the four sleep disorders. The meta-analysis found that the ESS had no value in identifying OSA. The variable that most strongly influenced PSQI or ESS scores was the HADS score.

CONCLUSION

The PSQI and ESS should no longer be used as a screening or diagnostic instrument for the four PSG-defined sleep disorders, especially in a low-risk population.

摘要

目的

(1)以阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)、周期性肢体运动障碍(PLMD)、快速眼动睡眠行为障碍(RBD)和发作性睡病作为标准,检验匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和 Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)的效标效度。(2)通过汇总当前和以前研究的荟萃分析,总结 ESS 对 OSA 诊断的效标效度的证据。(3)研究 PSQI 和 ESS 评分的决定因素。

方法

对连续转介至睡眠诊所的 367 例患者进行 PSQI 和 ESS 以及汉密尔顿焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估,HADS 用于评估焦虑和抑郁水平。如果怀疑为发作性睡病,患者还进行了整夜多导睡眠图(PSG)和多次睡眠潜伏期试验。

结果

ESS 和 PSQI(及其子量表)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积均<0.9,这意味着这些问卷对于预测四种睡眠障碍的准确性不高。荟萃分析发现 ESS 对识别 OSA 没有价值。对 PSQI 或 ESS 评分影响最大的变量是 HADS 评分。

结论

PSQI 和 ESS 不应再作为四种 PSG 定义的睡眠障碍的筛查或诊断工具,尤其是在低危人群中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验