• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

字素缓冲器与注意机制。

The graphemic buffer and attentional mechanisms.

作者信息

Hillis A E, Caramazza A

机构信息

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Corporation, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 1989 Feb;36(2):208-35. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90062-x.

DOI:10.1016/0093-934x(89)90062-x
PMID:2465807
Abstract

Two patients with acquired dysgraphia were reported. The patients' performance in various written and oral spelling tasks converge in support of the hypothesis that they have selective damage, within the spelling system, to the Graphemic Buffer. Although the patients present with comparable patterns of error types, they differ in the distribution of errors as a function of letter position in words. The patients' patterns of errors are compared to previously reported patterns of spelling errors in dysgraphic patients and are discussed in terms of hypothesized mechanisms that operate on the representations that are stored in the Graphemic Buffer.

摘要

报告了两名获得性书写障碍患者。这两名患者在各种书面和口头拼写任务中的表现趋同,支持了这样一种假设,即他们在拼写系统内对字形缓冲器有选择性损伤。尽管这两名患者呈现出相似的错误类型模式,但他们在错误分布上因单词中字母位置的不同而有所差异。将这两名患者的错误模式与先前报道的书写障碍患者的拼写错误模式进行了比较,并根据作用于存储在字形缓冲器中的表征的假设机制进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
The graphemic buffer and attentional mechanisms.字素缓冲器与注意机制。
Brain Lang. 1989 Feb;36(2):208-35. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90062-x.
2
Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia.词汇形态学及其在写作过程中的作用:来自一例后天性书写障碍病例的证据。
Cognition. 1990 Jun;35(3):205-43. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90023-d.
3
From letters to words: procedures for word recognition in letter-by-letter reading.从字母到单词:逐字母阅读中单词识别的过程。
Brain Lang. 1990 May;38(4):504-14. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90134-3.
4
The structure of graphemic representations.字素表征的结构。
Cognition. 1990 Dec;37(3):243-97. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-n.
5
Recognizing orally spelled words: an analysis of procedures shared with reading and spelling.识别口头拼写的单词:对与阅读和拼写共有的程序的分析。
Brain Lang. 1989 Aug;37(2):201-19. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(89)90015-1.
6
The contribution of attentional mechanisms to an irregularity effect at the graphemic buffer level.注意机制对字素缓冲水平的不规则效应的作用。
Brain Lang. 1998 Jun 1;63(1):64-78. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1934.
7
Acquired dysgraphia in alphabetic and stenographic handwriting.字母书写和速记书写中的后天性书写障碍。
Cortex. 1997 Jun;33(2):355-67. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70011-x.
8
The impact of deep dysgraphia on graphemic buffer disorders.深层失写症对字素缓冲障碍的影响。
Neurocase. 2004 Dec;10(6):405-19. doi: 10.1080/13554790490893995.
9
Dissociations in aphasia: a case report.失语症中的分离现象:一例报告。
Brain Lang. 1981 Jul;13(2):223-40. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(81)90092-4.
10
Mechanisms of reading and spelling in a case of alexia without agraphia.一例失读不伴失写患者的阅读与拼写机制
Neuropsychologia. 1982;20(5):533-45. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(82)90027-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential impacts of different keyboard inputting methods on reading and writing skills.不同键盘输入方式对读写能力的影响差异。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 21;8(1):17183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35268-9.
2
The Interaction between Central and Peripheral Processing in Chinese Handwritten Production: Evidence from the Effect of Lexicality and Radical Complexity.中文手写生成中中央与外周加工的交互作用:来自词汇性和部首复杂性效应的证据
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 13;8:334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00334. eCollection 2017.
3
Impairment of a parieto-premotor network specialized for handwriting in writer's cramp.
书写痉挛中专门用于书写的顶叶-运动前区网络受损。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Dec;37(12):4363-4375. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23315. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
4
Typing is writing: Linguistic properties modulate typing execution.打字即书写:语言属性调节打字执行。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1898-1906. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1044-3.
5
Influence of handwriting skills during spelling in primary and lower secondary grades.小学和初中阶段拼写过程中文书技能的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 5;4:818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00818. eCollection 2013.
6
Spelling intervention in post-stroke aphasia and primary progressive aphasia.脑卒中后失语症和原发性进行性失语症的拼写干预。
Behav Neurol. 2013;26(1-2):55-66. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-110240.
7
Patterns of dysgraphia in primary progressive aphasia compared to post-stroke aphasia.原发性进行性失语症与中风后失语症的失写症模式比较。
Behav Neurol. 2013;26(1-2):21-34. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2012-110237.
8
Neglect dyslexia: a review of the neuropsychological literature.忽视诵读困难:神经心理学文献综述。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(2):219-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2386-0. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
9
Patterns of breakdown in spelling in primary progressive aphasia.原发性进行性失语症中拼写错误的模式。
Cortex. 2011 Mar;47(3):342-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
10
A neural network critical for spelling.一个对拼写至关重要的神经网络。
Ann Neurol. 2009 Aug;66(2):249-53. doi: 10.1002/ana.21693.