Suppr超能文献

打字即书写:语言属性调节打字执行。

Typing is writing: Linguistic properties modulate typing execution.

作者信息

Pinet Svetlana, Ziegler Johannes C, Alario F-Xavier

机构信息

Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LPC UMR 7290, FR 3C FR3512, 13331, Marseille, France.

Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, UMR 7290 Pôle 3 C, Bâtiment 9 Case C, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille Cedex 3, France.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Dec;23(6):1898-1906. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1044-3.

Abstract

Typing is becoming our preferred way of writing. Perhaps because of the relative recency of this change, very few studies have investigated typing from a psycholinguistic perspective. In addition, and despite obvious similarities between typing and handwriting, typing research has remained rather disconnected from handwriting research. The current study aimed at bridging this gap by evaluating how typing is affected by a number of psycholinguistic variables defined at the word, syllable, and letter levels. In a writing-to-dictation task, we assessed typing performance by measuring response accuracy, onset latencies - an index of response preparation and initiation - and interkeystroke intervals (IKIs) - an index of response execution processes. The lexical and sublexical factors revealed a composite pattern of effects. Lexical frequency improved response latencies and accuracy, while bigram frequency speeded up IKIs. Sound-spelling consistency improved latencies, but had an inhibitory effect on IKI. IKIs were also longer at syllable boundaries. Together, our findings can be fit within a framework for typed production that combines the previously developed theories of spelling and typing execution. At their interface, we highlight the need for an intermediate hierarchical stage, perhaps in the form of a graphemic buffer for typing.

摘要

打字正成为我们偏爱的书写方式。或许由于这一变化相对较新,很少有研究从心理语言学角度对打字进行调查。此外,尽管打字和手写之间存在明显的相似之处,但打字研究与手写研究仍相当脱节。当前的研究旨在通过评估打字如何受到在单词、音节和字母层面定义的一些心理语言学变量的影响来弥合这一差距。在一个听写任务中,我们通过测量反应准确性、起始潜伏期(反应准备和启动的一个指标)以及击键间隔(IKIs,反应执行过程的一个指标)来评估打字表现。词汇和次词汇因素呈现出一种综合的影响模式。词汇频率提高了反应潜伏期和准确性,而双字母组频率加快了击键间隔。语音拼写一致性改善了潜伏期,但对击键间隔有抑制作用。在音节边界处击键间隔也更长。总之,我们的研究结果可以纳入一个打字产出框架,该框架结合了先前发展的拼写和打字执行理论。在它们的界面处,我们强调需要一个中间层次阶段,或许是以打字的字形缓冲器的形式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验