Song Alfred S, Najjar Amer M, Diller Kenneth R
J Biomech Eng. 2014 Jul;136(7). doi: 10.1115/1.4027272.
This study was conducted to compare the heat shock responses of cells grown in 2D and 3D culture environments as indicated by the level of heat shock protein 70 expression and the incidence of apoptosis and necrosis of prostate cancer cell lines in response to graded hyperthermia. PC3 cells were stably transduced with a dual reporter system composed of two tandem expression cassettes-a conditional heat shock protein promoter driving the expression of green fluorescent protein (HSPp-GFP) and a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter controlling the constitutive expression of a "beacon" red fluorescent protein (CMVp-RFP). Two-dimensional and three-dimensional cultures of PC3 prostate cancer cells were grown in 96-well plates for evaluation of their time-dependent response to supraphysiological temperature. To induce controlled hyperthermia, culture plates were placed on a flat copper surface of a circulating water manifold that maintained the specimens within ±0.1°C of a target temperature. Hyperthermia protocols included various combinations of temperature, ranging from 37°C to 57°C, and exposure times of up to 2 h. The majority of protocols were focused on temperature and time permutations, where the response gradient was greatest. Post-treatment analysis by flow cytometry analysis was used to measure the incidences of apoptosis (annexin V-FITC stain), necrosis (propidium iodide (PI) stain), and HSP70 transcription (GFP expression). Cells grown in 3D compared with 2D culture showed reduced incidence of apoptosis and necrosis and a higher level of HSP70 expression in response to heat shock at the temperatures tested. Cells responded differently to hyperthermia when grown in 2D and 3D cultures. Three-dimensional culture appears to enhance survival plausibly by activating protective processes related to enhanced-HSP70 expression. These differences highlight the importance of selecting physiologically relevant 3D models in assessing cellular responses to hyperthermia in experimental settings.
本研究旨在通过热休克蛋白70表达水平以及前列腺癌细胞系在分级热疗后的凋亡和坏死发生率,比较在二维和三维培养环境中生长的细胞的热休克反应。PC3细胞用由两个串联表达盒组成的双报告系统进行稳定转导,一个条件性热休克蛋白启动子驱动绿色荧光蛋白(HSPp-GFP)的表达,一个巨细胞病毒(CMV)启动子控制“信标”红色荧光蛋白(CMVp-RFP)的组成性表达。将PC3前列腺癌细胞的二维和三维培养物在96孔板中培养,以评估它们对超生理温度的时间依赖性反应。为了诱导可控热疗,将培养板放置在循环水歧管的平坦铜表面上,该表面将标本维持在目标温度的±0.1°C范围内。热疗方案包括温度从37°C到57°C的各种组合以及长达2小时的暴露时间。大多数方案集中在温度和时间的排列上,其中反应梯度最大。通过流式细胞术分析进行治疗后分析,以测量凋亡(膜联蛋白V-FITC染色)、坏死(碘化丙啶(PI)染色)和HSP70转录(GFP表达)的发生率。在测试温度下,与二维培养相比,三维培养的细胞凋亡和坏死发生率降低,热休克反应时HSP70表达水平更高。二维和三维培养的细胞对热疗的反应不同。三维培养似乎通过激活与增强HSP70表达相关的保护过程来增强存活率。这些差异突出了在实验环境中评估细胞对热疗反应时选择生理相关三维模型的重要性。