Olfermann Robin, Schlegel Sabine, Vogelsang Anna, Ebner-Priemer Ulrich, Zeeck Almut, Reichert Markus
Department of eHealth and sports analytics, Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Department for Sport and Exercise Science, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Mar;151(3):448-462. doi: 10.1111/acps.13757. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
Many patients with eating disorders (EDs) engage in excessive and compulsive physical activity (pathological exercise, PE) to regulate negative mood or to "burn calories." PE can lead to negative health consequences. Non-exercise activity (NEA) bears the potential to serve as intervention target to counteract PE and problematic eating behaviors since it has been associated with positive mood effects. However, to date, there is no investigation on whether the positive link between NEA and mood seen in the healthy translates to patients with ED.
To study potential associations of NEA and mood in ED, we subjected 29 ED-patients and 35 healthy controls (HCs) to an ambulatory assessment study across 7 days. We measured NEA via accelerometers and repeatedly assessed mood on electronic smartphone diaries via a mixed sampling strategy based on events, activity and time. Within- and between-subject effects of NEA on mood, PE as moderator, and the temporal course of effects were analyzed via multilevel modeling.
NEA increased valence (β = 2.12, p < 0.001) and energetic arousal (β = 4.02, p < 0.001) but showed no significant effect on calmness. The effects of NEA on energetic arousal where significantly stronger for HCs (β = 6.26, p < 0.001) than for EDs (β = 4.02, p < 0.001; β = 2.24, p = 0.0135). Effects of NEA were robust across most timeframes of NEA and significantly moderated by PE, that is, Lower PE levels exhibited stronger NEA effects on energetic arousal.
Patients with ED and HC show an affective benefit from NEA, partly depending on the level of PE. If replicated in experimental daily life studies, this evidence may pave the way towards expedient NEA interventions to cope with negative mood. Interventions could be especially promising if delivered as Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) and should be tailored according to the PE level.
许多饮食失调(ED)患者会进行过度且强迫性的体育活动(病理性运动,PE)来调节负面情绪或“燃烧卡路里”。病理性运动可能会导致负面健康后果。非运动活动(NEA)有可能成为干预靶点,以对抗病理性运动和问题饮食行为,因为它与积极的情绪效应相关。然而,迄今为止,尚未有研究探讨在健康人群中观察到的非运动活动与情绪之间的正向关联是否适用于饮食失调患者。
为研究饮食失调患者中非运动活动与情绪之间的潜在关联,我们对29名饮食失调患者和35名健康对照者(HCs)进行了为期7天的动态评估研究。我们通过加速度计测量非运动活动,并通过基于事件、活动和时间的混合抽样策略,在电子智能手机日记中反复评估情绪。通过多水平模型分析非运动活动对情绪的个体内和个体间效应、以病理性运动作为调节变量以及效应的时间进程。
非运动活动提高了效价(β = 2.12,p < 0.001)和精力唤醒(β = 4.02,p < 0.001),但对平静度无显著影响。非运动活动对精力唤醒的效应在健康对照者中(β = 6.26,p < 0.001)显著强于饮食失调患者(β = 4.02,p < 0.001;β = 2.24,p = 0.0135)。非运动活动的效应在非运动活动的大多数时间框架内都很稳健,并且受到病理性运动的显著调节,即较低的病理性运动水平表现出非运动活动对精力唤醒的更强效应。
饮食失调患者和健康对照者都从非运动活动中获得了情感益处,部分取决于病理性运动的水平。如果在实验性日常生活研究中得到重复验证,这一证据可能为通过便捷的非运动活动干预来应对负面情绪铺平道路。如果作为即时适应性干预(JITAIs)进行干预可能会特别有前景,并且应该根据病理性运动水平进行调整。