Brehmer F, Haenssle H A, Daeschlein G, Ahmed R, Pfeiffer S, Görlitz A, Simon D, Schön M P, Wandke D, Emmert S
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jan;29(1):148-55. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12490. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP, i.e. ionized air) is an innovating promising tool in reducing bacteria.
We conducted the first clinical trial with the novel PlasmaDerm® VU-2010 device to assess safety and, as secondary endpoints, efficacy and applicability of 45 s/cm(2) cold atmospheric plasma as add-on therapy against chronic venous leg ulcers.
From April 2011 to April 2012, 14 patients were randomized to receive standardized modern wound care (n = 7) or plasma in addition to standard care (n = 7) 3× per week for 8 weeks. The ulcer size was determined weekly (Visitrak® , photodocumentation). Bacterial load (bacterial swabs, contact agar plates) and pain during and between treatments (visual analogue scales) were assessed. Patients and doctors rated the applicability of plasma (questionnaires).
The plasma treatment was safe with 2 SAEs and 77 AEs approximately equally distributed among both groups (P = 0.77 and P = 1.0, Fisher's exact test). Two AEs probably related to plasma. Plasma treatment resulted in a significant reduction in lesional bacterial load (P = 0.04, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). A more than 50% ulcer size reduction was noted in 5/7 and 4/7 patients in the standard and plasma groups, respectively, and a greater size reduction occurred in the plasma group (plasma -5.3 cm(2) , standard: -3.4 cm(2) ) (non-significant, P = 0.42, log-rank test). The only ulcer that closed after 7 weeks received plasma. Patients in the plasma group quoted less pain compared to the control group. The plasma applicability was not rated inferior to standard wound care (P = 0.94, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test). Physicians would recommend (P = 0.06, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test) or repeat (P = 0.08, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test) plasma treatment by trend.
Cold atmospheric plasma displays favourable antibacterial effects. We demonstrated that plasma treatment with the PlasmaDerm® VU-2010 device is safe and effective in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Thus, larger controlled trials and the development of devices with larger application surfaces are warranted.
冷大气等离子体(CAP,即电离空气)是一种在减少细菌方面具有创新性且前景广阔的工具。
我们使用新型PlasmaDerm® VU - 2010设备进行了首例临床试验,以评估45 s/cm(2)冷大气等离子体作为慢性下肢静脉溃疡附加治疗的安全性,以及作为次要终点的有效性和适用性。
从2011年4月至2012年4月,14例患者被随机分为两组,一组接受标准化现代伤口护理(n = 7),另一组在标准护理基础上每周额外接受3次等离子体治疗(n = 7),共治疗8周。每周测定溃疡大小(Visitrak®,照片记录)。评估细菌负荷(细菌拭子、接触琼脂平板)以及治疗期间和治疗间隔的疼痛情况(视觉模拟量表)。患者和医生对等离子体的适用性进行评分(问卷调查)。
等离子体治疗是安全的,有2例严重不良事件(SAE)和77例不良事件(AE),两组分布大致相同(P = 0.77和P = 1.0,Fisher精确检验)。有2例不良事件可能与等离子体有关。等离子体治疗使病灶细菌负荷显著降低(P = 0.04,Wilcoxon符号秩检验)。标准组和等离子体组分别有5/7和4/7的患者溃疡大小减少超过50%,且等离子体组溃疡大小减少幅度更大(等离子体组 -5.3 cm(2),标准组:-3.4 cm(2))(无显著性差异,P = 0.42,对数秩检验)。唯一在7周后愈合的溃疡接受了等离子体治疗。与对照组相比,等离子体组患者报告的疼痛较少。等离子体的适用性评分不低于标准伤口护理(P = 0.94,Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney检验)。医生有推荐(P = 0.06,Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney检验)或重复(P = 0.08,Wilcoxon - Mann - Whitney检验)等离子体治疗的趋势。
冷大气等离子体具有良好的抗菌效果。我们证明了使用PlasmaDerm® VU - 2010设备进行等离子体治疗对慢性下肢静脉溃疡患者是安全有效的。因此,有必要进行更大规模的对照试验并开发具有更大应用表面的设备。