Ritchie S D, Wabano M-J, Russell K, Enosse L, Young N L
935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada.
16A Complex Drive Wikwemikong, Ontario, Canada.
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2523. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
Aboriginal people in Canada (First Nations, Inuit and Métis) have a lower health status compared to the Canadian population. There is a particular concern about the mental health and wellbeing of First Nations adolescents living on reserves. Interventions following principles of outdoor education and adventure therapy appear to be an appropriate fit for this population. These approaches have proven effective in non-Aboriginal populations, yet there is very little evidence on the efficacy of these types of program for Aboriginal adolescents. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an outdoor adventure leadership experience (OALE) on the resilience and wellbeing of First Nations adolescents from one reserve community. The secondary purposes were to explore whether this impact was sustainable, and whether there were any intervening factors that may have influenced the impact.
The collaborative research team used a mixed-method design to evaluate the 10-day OALE for adolescents from Wikwemikong Unceded Indian Reserve in northern Ontario, Canada. The main outcome assessed was resilience, measured by self-report, using the 14-Item Resilience Scale (RS-14). Several other exploratory measures assessed other aspects of health and well-being. The questionnaire package was administered at three different time periods: (T1) one day before the OALE; (T2) one month after the OALE; and (T3) one year after the OALE. The Mental Component Score (MCS) of the SF-12v2 was used to confirm any changes in resilience. Open-ended questions were appended to the questionnaire at the 1-year point to identify any intervening factors that may have impacted any changes in resilience and wellbeing. The primary analysis compared mean RS-14 scores at T1 with those at T2. Responses to the open-ended questions were analyzed using content analysis.
Over two summers (2009 and 2010), 73 youth 12-18 years of age from Wikwemikong participated in a standardized 10-day OALE program. This represented 15% of the on-reserve population of adolescents in this age range. Survey responses from 59 (80.8%) participants were available for analysis at T1, compared to 47 (64.4%) at T2 and 33 (45.2%) at T3. The mean RS-14 score was 73.65 at baseline, and this improved 3.40 points (=0.011) between T1 and T2. However, the resilience scores at T3 (1 year post-OALE) had a mean of 74.19, indicating a return back to pre-OALE levels. The mean MCS score at T1 was 48.23 and it improved over the subsequent two time periods. Several intervening factors reported at T3 may have influenced the decrease in resilience scores from T2 to T3. These included changes in family living situation, death in the family, and other life stressors that occurred over the course of the year.
Outcome scores from this study provide a unique glimpse into the self-reported health and wellbeing for adolescents within one First Nations community in Canada. The OALE program was beneficial in promoting resilience for adolescents in Wikwemikong over the short-term. Future studies are necessary to assess whether the OALE (or similar outdoor type interventions) are effective within other communities.
与加拿大总人口相比,加拿大的原住民(第一民族、因纽特人和梅蒂斯人)健康状况较差。人们尤其关注生活在保留地的第一民族青少年的心理健康和幸福状况。遵循户外教育和冒险治疗原则的干预措施似乎适合这一人群。这些方法在非原住民人群中已被证明有效,但关于这类项目对原住民青少年疗效的证据却非常少。本研究的主要目的是评估户外冒险领导力体验(OALE)对来自一个保留地社区的第一民族青少年恢复力和幸福状况的影响。次要目的是探讨这种影响是否可持续,以及是否存在可能影响该影响的干预因素。
合作研究团队采用混合方法设计,对来自加拿大安大略省北部维克韦米孔未被割让印第安保留地的青少年进行为期10天的OALE评估。评估的主要结果是恢复力,通过自我报告,使用14项恢复力量表(RS - 14)进行测量。其他一些探索性指标评估了健康和幸福状况的其他方面。调查问卷包在三个不同时间段进行发放:(T1)OALE开始前一天;(T2)OALE结束后一个月;(T3)OALE结束后一年。使用SF - 12v2的心理成分得分(MCS)来确认恢复力的任何变化。在1年时间点的调查问卷中附加了开放式问题,以确定可能影响恢复力和幸福状况变化的任何干预因素。主要分析将T1时的RS - 14平均得分与T2时的得分进行比较。对开放式问题的回答采用内容分析法进行分析。
在两个夏天(2009年和2010年),来自维克韦米孔的73名12 - 18岁青少年参加了标准化的为期10天的OALE项目。这占该年龄段保留地青少年人口的15%。在T1时,有59名(80.8%)参与者的调查回复可供分析,T2时为47名(64.4%),T3时为33名(45.2%)。基线时RS - 14的平均得分为73.65,在T1和T2之间提高了3.40分(=0.011)。然而,T3(OALE结束后1年)时的恢复力得分平均为74.19,表明回到了OALE前的水平。T1时的MCS平均得分为48.23,在随后的两个时间段有所提高。T3时报告的几个干预因素可能影响了从T2到T3恢复力得分的下降。这些因素包括家庭生活状况的变化、家庭成员死亡以及这一年中发生的其他生活压力源。
本研究的结果分数为了解加拿大一个第一民族社区青少年自我报告的健康和幸福状况提供了独特视角。OALE项目在短期内有助于提高维克韦米孔青少年的恢复力。未来有必要进行研究,以评估OALE(或类似的户外类型干预措施)在其他社区是否有效。