Kaminski Rafal M, Rogawski Michael A, Klitgaard Henrik
Neuroscience TA, UCB Pharma, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Neurotherapeutics. 2014 Apr;11(2):385-400. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0266-1.
A major goal of contemporary epilepsy research is the identification of therapies to prevent the development of recurrent seizures in individuals at risk, including those with brain injuries, infections, or neoplasms; status epilepticus; cortical dysplasias; or genetic epilepsy susceptibility. In this review we consider the evidence largely from preclinical models for the antiepileptogenic activity of a diverse range of potential therapies, including some marketed antiseizure drugs, as well as agents that act by immune and inflammatory mechanisms; reduction of oxidative stress; activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors γ pathways; effects on factors related to thrombolysis, hematopoesis, and angiogenesis; inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reducatase; brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling; and blockade of α2 adrenergic and cannabinoid receptors. Antiepileptogenesis refers to a therapy of which the beneficial action is to reduce seizure frequency or severity outlasting the treatment period. To date, clinical trials have failed to demonstrate that antiseizure drugs have such disease-modifying activity. However, studies in animal models with levetiracetam and ethosuximide are encouraging, and clinical trials with these agents are warranted. Other promising strategies are inhibition of interleukin 1β signaling by drugs such as VX-765; modulation of sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling by drugs such as fingolimod; activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin by drugs such as rapamycin; the hormone erythropoietin; and, paradoxically, drugs such as the α2 adrenergic receptor antagonist atipamezole and the CB1 cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (rimonabant) with proexcitatory activity. These approaches could lead to a new paradigm in epilepsy drug therapy where treatment for a limited period prevents the occurrence of spontaneous seizures, thus avoiding lifelong commitment to symptomatic treatment.
当代癫痫研究的一个主要目标是确定能够预防有复发癫痫风险个体(包括那些患有脑损伤、感染或肿瘤;癫痫持续状态;皮质发育异常;或遗传性癫痫易感性的个体)出现复发性癫痫发作的治疗方法。在本综述中,我们主要考虑来自临床前模型的证据,这些证据涉及多种潜在治疗方法的抗癫痫发生活性,包括一些已上市的抗癫痫药物,以及通过免疫和炎症机制起作用的药物;减轻氧化应激;激活雷帕霉素哺乳动物靶点或过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ途径;对与溶栓、造血和血管生成相关的因子的影响;抑制3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶;脑源性神经营养因子信号传导;以及阻断α2肾上腺素能受体和大麻素受体。抗癫痫发生是指一种治疗方法,其有益作用是在治疗期过后降低癫痫发作频率或严重程度。迄今为止,临床试验未能证明抗癫痫药物具有这种疾病修饰活性。然而,在动物模型中使用左乙拉西坦和乙琥胺的研究令人鼓舞,因此有必要对这些药物进行临床试验。其他有前景的策略包括用VX-765等药物抑制白细胞介素1β信号传导;用芬戈莫德等药物调节鞘氨醇1-磷酸信号传导;用雷帕霉素等药物激活雷帕霉素哺乳动物靶点;激素促红细胞生成素;以及矛盾的是,用具有促兴奋活性的α2肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂阿替美唑和CB1大麻素拮抗剂SR141716A(利莫那班)等药物。这些方法可能会导致癫痫药物治疗的新范式,即有限期的治疗可预防自发性癫痫发作的发生,从而避免终身进行对症治疗。