Marateb Hamid Reza, Mansourian Marjan, Adibi Peyman, Farina Dario
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, the University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Health School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):47-56.
selecting the correct statistical test and data mining method depends highly on the measurement scale of data, type of variables, and purpose of the analysis. Different measurement scales are studied in details and statistical comparison, modeling, and data mining methods are studied based upon using several medical examples. We have presented two ordinal-variables clustering examples, as more challenging variable in analysis, using Wisconsin Breast Cancer Data (WBCD).
ORDINAL-TO-INTERVAL SCALE CONVERSION EXAMPLE: a breast cancer database of nine 10-level ordinal variables for 683 patients was analyzed by two ordinal-scale clustering methods. The performance of the clustering methods was assessed by comparison with the gold standard groups of malignant and benign cases that had been identified by clinical tests.
the sensitivity and accuracy of the two clustering methods were 98% and 96%, respectively. Their specificity was comparable.
by using appropriate clustering algorithm based on the measurement scale of the variables in the study, high performance is granted. Moreover, descriptive and inferential statistics in addition to modeling approach must be selected based on the scale of the variables.
选择正确的统计检验和数据挖掘方法在很大程度上取决于数据的测量尺度、变量类型和分析目的。本文详细研究了不同的测量尺度,并基于几个医学实例研究了统计比较、建模和数据挖掘方法。我们使用威斯康星乳腺癌数据(WBCD)给出了两个有序变量聚类实例,作为分析中更具挑战性的变量。
采用两种有序尺度聚类方法对一个包含683例患者的、有9个10级有序变量的乳腺癌数据库进行分析。通过与经临床检验确定的恶性和良性病例的金标准组进行比较,评估聚类方法的性能。
两种聚类方法的灵敏度和准确率分别为98%和96%。它们的特异性相当。
通过基于研究中变量的测量尺度使用适当的聚类算法,可以获得高性能。此外,描述性和推断性统计以及建模方法都必须根据变量的尺度来选择。