Dombrowski Kirk, Curtis Richard, Friedman Samuel, Khan Bilal
Social Networks Research Group, John Jay College CUNY, New York, USA.
National Development Research Institute, New York, USA.
World J AIDS. 2013 Mar 1;3(1):1-9. doi: 10.4236/wja.2013.31001.
Recent interest by physicists in social networks and disease transmission factors has prompted debate over the topology of degree distributions in sexual networks. Social network researchers have been critical of "scale-free" Barabasi-Albert approaches, and largely rejected the preferential attachment, "rich-get-richer" assumptions that underlie that model. Instead, research on sexual networks has pointed to the importance of homophily and local sexual norms in dictating degree distributions, and thus disease transmission thresholds. Injecting Drug User (IDU) network topologies may differ from the emerging models of sexual networks, however. Degree distribution analysis of a Brooklyn, NY, IDU network indicates a different topology than the spanning tree configurations discussed for sexual networks, instead featuring comparatively short cycles and high concurrency. Our findings suggest that IDU networks do in some ways conform to a "scale-free" topology, and thus may represent "reservoirs" of potential infection despite seemingly low transmission thresholds.
物理学家近期对社交网络和疾病传播因素的关注引发了关于性网络中度分布拓扑结构的争论。社交网络研究人员对“无标度”的巴拉巴西 - 阿尔伯特方法持批评态度,并在很大程度上摒弃了该模型所基于的优先连接、“富者更富”假设。相反,对性网络的研究指出了同质性和当地性规范在决定度分布以及疾病传播阈值方面的重要性。然而,注射吸毒者(IDU)网络拓扑结构可能与新兴的性网络模型不同。对纽约布鲁克林一个注射吸毒者网络的度分布分析表明,其拓扑结构与为性网络所讨论的生成树配置不同,而是具有相对较短的循环和高并发度。我们的研究结果表明,注射吸毒者网络在某些方面确实符合“无标度”拓扑结构,因此尽管传播阈值看似较低,但仍可能代表潜在感染的“蓄水池”。