Biro Peter A, Adriaenssens Bart, Sampson Portia
Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Road, Geelong, Vic., 3216, Australia.
Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2032, Australia.
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Sep;83(5):1186-95. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12210. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
The evolutionary causes of consistent individual differences in behaviour are currently a source of debate. A recent hypothesis suggests that consistent individual differences in life-history productivity (growth and/or fecundity) may covary with behavioural traits that contribute to growth-mortality trade-offs, such as risk-proneness (boldness) and foraging activity (voraciousness). It remains unclear, however, to what extent individual behavioural and life-history profiles are set early in life, or are a more flexible result of specific environmental or developmental contexts that allow bold and active individuals to acquire more resources. Longitudinal studies of individually housed animals under controlled conditions can shed light on this question. Since growth and behaviour can both vary within individuals (they are labile), studying between-individual correlations in behaviour and growth rate requires repeated scoring for both variables over an extended period of time. However, such a study has not yet been done. Here, we repeatedly measured individual mass seven times each, boldness 40 times each and voracity eight times each during the first 4 months of life on 90 individually housed crayfish (Cherax destructor). Animals were fed ad libitum, generating a context where individuals can express their intrinsic growth rate (i.e. growth capacity), but in which bold and voracious behaviour is not necessary for high resource acquisition (crayfish can and do hoard food back to their burrow). We show that individuals that were consistently bold over time during the day were also bolder at night, were more voracious and maintained higher growth rates over time than shy individuals. Independent of individual differences, we also observed that males were faster-growing, bolder and more voracious than females. Our findings imply that associations between bold behaviour and fast growth can occur in unlimited food contexts where there is no necessary link between bold behaviour and resource acquisition - offering support for the 'personality-productivity' hypothesis. We suggest future research should study links between consistent individual differences in behaviour and life history under a wider range of contexts, in order to shed light on the role of biotic and abiotic conditions in the strength, direction and stability of their covariance.
行为上持续存在的个体差异的进化原因目前是一个争论的焦点。最近的一个假说认为,生活史生产力(生长和/或繁殖力)方面持续存在的个体差异可能与有助于生长 - 死亡率权衡的行为特征相关,例如冒险倾向(大胆)和觅食活动(贪吃)。然而,个体行为和生活史特征在生命早期设定的程度,或者是特定环境或发育背景下更灵活的结果(使大胆和活跃的个体能够获取更多资源),仍不清楚。在受控条件下对单独饲养动物的纵向研究可以阐明这个问题。由于生长和行为在个体内部都可能变化(它们是不稳定的),研究行为和生长速率之间的个体间相关性需要在较长时间内对这两个变量进行重复评分。然而,这样的研究尚未进行。在此,我们在90只单独饲养的小龙虾(克氏原螯虾)生命的前4个月里,分别对个体体重测量了7次,对大胆程度测量了40次,对贪吃程度测量了8次。动物可自由进食,营造了一个个体能够表达其内在生长速率(即生长能力)的环境,但在这种环境中,大胆和贪吃行为对于获取大量资源并非必要(小龙虾能够并且确实会将食物贮藏回洞穴)。我们发现,在白天随时间一直保持大胆的个体在夜间也更大胆,比胆小的个体更贪吃,并且随时间维持更高的生长速率。独立于个体差异,我们还观察到雄性比雌性生长得更快、更大胆且更贪吃。我们的研究结果表明,在食物充足的环境中,大胆行为和快速生长之间的关联能够出现,在这种环境中大胆行为与资源获取之间没有必然联系——这为“个性 - 生产力”假说提供了支持。我们建议未来的研究应在更广泛的背景下研究行为和生活史中持续存在的个体差异之间的联系,以便阐明生物和非生物条件在它们协方差的强度、方向和稳定性方面所起的作用。