Suppr超能文献

糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简表的开发与验证

Development and validation of the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire-Short Form.

作者信息

Peyrot M, Xu Y, Rubin R R

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2014 Oct;31(10):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/dme.12453. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

Abstract

AIMS

To develop and validate a short form of the 54-item Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire that maintains the domains and performance characteristics of the long-form questionnaire.

METHODS

Data from the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire validation study were analysed to select items representing the nine scales (convenience, negative events, interference, self-monitoring of blood glucose burden, efficacy, social burden, psychological well-being, treatment satisfaction and treatment preference). The resulting 20-item Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form was administered online, with validated criterion measures of treatment satisfaction and medication adherence, with a retest within 2 weeks. Participants were US adults (N = 413) with Type 2 diabetes using oral agents alone; insulin by syringe and/or pen with or without oral agents; or glucagon-like peptide-1 agents. Most participants (82%) completed the retest.

RESULTS

The median inter-item agreement of scales was 0.76 and the total composite (mean of all items except treatment preference) was 0.88. The median test-retest reliability of scales was 0.86, and of the total composite was 0.95. All statistically significant correlations between Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form scales and criterion measures of treatment satisfaction and adherence were in the expected direction. The median correlation of the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form with corresponding criterion measures of treatment satisfaction was 0.59; the mean correlation of the same Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form measures with adherence was 0.42. The Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form scales were more powerful predictors of adherence than were the criterion measures of treatment satisfaction. The Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form scales differentiated between those taking different medications and between those using different insulin delivery devices.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire Short-Form provides a comprehensive set of measures with acceptable reliability and validity and a reduced burden of administration.

摘要

目的

开发并验证54项糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷的简版,使其保留长版问卷的各领域内容及性能特征。

方法

对糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷验证研究的数据进行分析,以选择代表九个量表(便利性、负面事件、干扰、血糖自我监测负担、疗效、社会负担、心理健康、治疗满意度和治疗偏好)的条目。由此产生的20项糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简版通过在线方式进行施测,并采用经过验证的治疗满意度和药物依从性标准测量方法,在2周内进行重测。参与者为仅使用口服药物、使用注射器和/或笔注射胰岛素(无论是否联合口服药物)或使用胰高血糖素样肽-1药物的美国成年2型糖尿病患者。大多数参与者(82%)完成了重测。

结果

各量表的条目间中位数一致性为0.76,总综合得分(除治疗偏好外所有条目的平均值)为0.88。各量表的重测信度中位数为0.86,总综合得分的重测信度为0.95。糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简版各量表与治疗满意度和依从性标准测量方法之间所有具有统计学意义的相关性均符合预期方向。糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简版与相应治疗满意度标准测量方法的中位数相关性为0.59;同一糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简版测量方法与依从性的平均相关性为0.42。糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简版量表比治疗满意度标准测量方法更能有力地预测依从性。糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简版量表能够区分服用不同药物的患者以及使用不同胰岛素给药装置的患者。

结论

本研究表明,糖尿病药物治疗系统评分问卷简版提供了一套全面的测量方法,具有可接受的信度和效度,且管理负担减轻。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Diabetes Medication System Rating Questionnaire-Short Form.
Diabet Med. 2014 Oct;31(10):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/dme.12453. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
Development of a New Measure for Assessing Insulin Delivery Device Satisfaction in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):773-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0140. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Development of a New Measure for Assessing Glucose Monitoring Device-Related Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):657-63. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0417. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers.
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.009.

引用本文的文献

4
Treatment Satisfaction With Omnipod DASH in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Nonblinded 1:1 Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jul 12;109(8):1984-1995. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae088.
6
Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 13;23(8):e25002. doi: 10.2196/25002.

本文引用的文献

5
Physician perception and recommendation of insulin pens for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Aug;24(8):2413-22. doi: 10.1185/03007990802278644. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
6
Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 May;10(5):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07572.x.
9
Factors affecting use of insulin pens by patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):430-2. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1899. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
10
An evaluation of an insulin transfer programme delivered in a group setting.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7B):152-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01772.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验