Orthopaedic Research and Imaging Center in Arthroplasty, Clinique Médico-Chirurgicale, Bruay-Labuissière, France.
Homer Stryker Center for Orthopaedic Education and Research, Mahwah, New Jersey; Department of Biomechanics, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1369-72. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
At a minimum follow-up of ten years we compared clinical and radiographic findings and survivorship in a cohort of 412 patients (447 hips) who received alumina on alumina CoC bearings to findings from a cohort of 216 patients (228 hips) with alumina on highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) bearings. All patients were operated for osteoarthritis. With bearing-related complications as endpoint, analysis showed no significant difference in survivorship between cohorts (99.8% for the CoC vs. 99.4% for HXLPE). In addition, there were no significant differences in clinical and radiographic findings between cohorts. We concluded that alumina on HXLPE bearings are a reasonable lower cost alternative to ceramic on ceramic bearing couples.
在至少十年的随访中,我们比较了一组 412 名患者(447 髋)的临床和影像学发现以及生存率,这些患者接受了氧化铝/氧化铝金属对金属关节和另一组 216 名患者(228 髋)的氧化铝/超高交联聚乙烯(HXLPE)关节的随访。所有患者均因骨关节炎而接受手术。以与关节相关的并发症为终点,分析显示两组之间的生存率无显著差异(CoC 为 99.8%,HXLPE 为 99.4%)。此外,两组之间的临床和影像学发现也没有显著差异。我们的结论是,氧化铝/超高交联聚乙烯关节是陶瓷/陶瓷关节对的一种合理的低成本替代方案。