• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陶瓷对陶瓷、金属对高交联聚乙烯以及金属对金属轴承磨损率的比较。

Comparison of Wear Rate between Ceramic-on-Ceramic, Metal on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene, and Metal-on-Metal Bearings.

作者信息

Higuchi Yoshitoshi, Seki Taisuke, Morita Daigo, Komatsu Daigo, Takegami Yasuhiko, Ishiguro Naoki

机构信息

Departamento de Cirurgia Ortopédica, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Japão.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 May;54(3):295-302. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691762. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1691762
PMID:31363284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6597422/
Abstract

Currently, there is a lack of evidence on the medium-term follow-up of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using metal on highly cross-linked polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), and metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings. Our aim was to calculate the 5- to 10-year wear rate and the incidence rate of osteolysis for 3 types of bearings.  A total of 77 patients underwent MoP, 105 underwent ceramic CoC, and 55 underwent MoM THAs. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 64.7, 55.9, and 59.9 years old in the MoP, CoC, and MoM bearings, respectively. Clinical and radiologic measurements at a mean follow-up of 7.6 years were analyzed.  The mean postoperative Harris hip scores showed no difference among the groups. The mean annual liner wear rates were 0.0160, 0.0040 and 0.0054 mm/year in MoP, CoC bearings, and MoM bearings, with that of CoC bearings being significantly lower than the others. Osteolysis (14.5%) among MoM bearings was significantly more frequently observed compared with the others. Kaplan-Meier survival at 10 years with implant loosening, or revision THA as the endpoint, was 96.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.4-98.7) for MoP, 98.6% (95% CI: 90.3-98.6) for CoC bearing, and 98.2% (95% CI: 88.0-99.7) for MoM bearings (  = 0.360).  Excellent clinical and radiological outcomes were obtained for MoP and CoC bearings.

摘要

目前,对于使用金属与高交联聚乙烯(MoP)、陶瓷对陶瓷(CoC)以及金属对金属(MoM)轴承的非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术(THA)的中期随访,缺乏相关证据。我们的目的是计算这三种类型轴承5至10年的磨损率和骨溶解发生率。

共有77例患者接受了MoP型THA,105例接受了陶瓷CoC型THA,55例接受了MoM型THA。MoP、CoC和MoM轴承组患者手术时的平均年龄分别为64.7岁、55.9岁和59.9岁。对平均随访7.6年时的临床和影像学测量结果进行了分析。

术后平均Harris髋关节评分在各组之间无差异。MoP、CoC轴承和MoM轴承的平均每年内衬磨损率分别为0.0160、0.0040和0.0054mm/年,CoC轴承的磨损率显著低于其他两组。与其他组相比,MoM轴承组的骨溶解发生率(14.5%)显著更高。以植入物松动或翻修THA为终点的10年Kaplan-Meier生存率,MoP组为96.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:88.4 - 98.7),CoC轴承组为98.6%(95%CI:90.3 - 98.6),MoM轴承组为98.2%(95%CI:88.0 - 99.7)(P = 0.360)。

MoP和CoC轴承获得了良好的临床和影像学结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/122142d8c773/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/1f15d6384dee/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/fe9c1c81c396/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/fbaa04aaea0a/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/9baafacaf5d1/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/e9208eb8f057/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/122142d8c773/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045pt-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/1f15d6384dee/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045en-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/fe9c1c81c396/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045en-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/fbaa04aaea0a/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045en-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/9baafacaf5d1/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045pt-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/e9208eb8f057/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045pt-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ce4/6597422/122142d8c773/10-1055-s-0039-1691762-i180045pt-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Wear Rate between Ceramic-on-Ceramic, Metal on Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene, and Metal-on-Metal Bearings.陶瓷对陶瓷、金属对高交联聚乙烯以及金属对金属轴承磨损率的比较。
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 May;54(3):295-302. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691762. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.8 年随访后,初次全髋关节置换术的患者中,金属对金属 Ultamet 比陶瓷对陶瓷的存活率相同,但骨溶解率更高。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1155-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
4
Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的磨损显著低于金属对高交联聚乙烯轴承:一项10至14年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1246-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
5
Comparison of cementless total hip arthroplasty survivorship between metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic on ceramic bearings: A case control study with a 5-9-year follow-up.金属对超高交联聚乙烯与陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的非骨水泥全髋关节置换术后生存率的比较:5-9 年随访的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Sep;104(5):663-669. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.比较使用传统聚乙烯、金属对金属或陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的髋关节假体十年生存率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858.
7
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
8
Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?髋关节置换术中人工关节周围感染:感染与关节面类型之间存在关联吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2213-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4916-y.
9
Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings.无骨水泥全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷和金属对聚乙烯轴承翻修风险的比较。
Acta Orthop. 2015;86(4):477-84. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Following Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With Other Hip Bearings in Medicare Population.在 Medicare 人群中,比较金属对金属全髋关节置换术与其他髋关节假体的术后并发症。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1826-1832. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.066. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnetic Resonance Safety Evaluation of a Novel Alumina Matrix Composite Ceramic Knee and Image Artifact Comparison to a Metal Knee Implant of Analogous Design.新型氧化铝基复合陶瓷膝关节的磁共振安全性评估及与类似设计金属膝关节植入物的图像伪影比较
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Jul 23;22:101170. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101170. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty at Five to Twelve Years Follow-Up: A Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report.金属对金属全髋关节置换术:5至12年随访——对既往报告的简要随访
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1773-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.058. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
2
Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同关节面的全髋关节置换术在生存率上是否存在差异?一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):21871-85. eCollection 2015.
3
Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.
陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的磨损显著低于金属对高交联聚乙烯轴承:一项10至14年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1246-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
4
There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.全髋关节表面置换选择的短期至中期生存率无差异:一项网状Meta分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2031-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4065-0. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
5
Wear of highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular components.高度交联聚乙烯髋臼部件的磨损。
Acta Orthop. 2015 Apr;86(2):159-68. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.972890. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
6
No differences found in bearing related hip survivorship at 10-12 years follow-up between patients with ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings compared to patients with ceramic on ceramic bearings.在 10-12 年的随访中,与陶瓷对陶瓷轴承相比,陶瓷对超高交联聚乙烯轴承的患者在髋关节生存率方面没有差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1369-72. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Radiographic evaluation in epiphysiolysis: possible predictors of bilaterality?骨骺分离的影像学评估:双侧性的可能预测因素?
Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(4):203-6. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000400001.
8
Wear of 36-mm BIOLOX(R) delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in total hip replacements under edge loading conditions.36毫米BIOLOX® delta陶瓷对陶瓷轴承在边缘负荷条件下用于全髋关节置换时的磨损情况。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 May;227(5):535-42. doi: 10.1177/0954411912474613. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Advantages and disadvantages of ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a review.陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的优缺点:综述
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2012 Sep;156(3):204-12. doi: 10.5507/bp.2012.063. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
10
Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.比较使用传统聚乙烯、金属对金属或陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的髋关节假体十年生存率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858.