Garten Ryan S, Groot H Jonathan, Rossman Matthew J, Gifford Jayson R, Richardson Russell S
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah;
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 May 1;116(9):1204-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00103.2014. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
Exercise-induced hyperemia is often normalized for muscle mass, and this value is sometimes evaluated at relative exercise intensities to take muscle recruitment into account. Therefore, this study sought to better understand the impact of muscle mass on leg blood flow (LBF) during exercise. LBF was assessed by Doppler ultrasound in 27 young healthy male subjects performing knee-extensor (KE) exercise at three absolute (5, 15, and 25 W) and three relative [20, 40, and 60% of maximum KE (KEmax)] workloads. Thigh muscle mass (5.2-8.1 kg) and LBF were significantly correlated at rest (r = 0.54; P = 0.004). Exercise-induced hyperemia was linearly related to absolute workload, but revealed substantial between-subject variability, documented by the coefficient of variation (5 W: 17%; 15 W: 16%; 25 W: 16%). Quadriceps muscle mass (1.5-2.7 kg) and LBF were not correlated at 5, 15, or 25 W (r = 0.09-0.01; P = 0.7-0.9). Normalizing blood flow for quadriceps muscle mass did not improve the coefficient of variation at each absolute workload (5 W: 21%; 15 W: 21%; 25 W: 22%), while the additional evaluation at relative exercise intensities resulted in even greater variance (20% KEmax: 29%; 40% KEmax: 29%; 60% KEmax: 27%). Similar findings were documented when subjects were parsed into high and low aerobic capacity. Thus, in contrast to rest, blood flow during exercise is unrelated to muscle mass, and simply normalizing for muscle mass or comparing normalized blood flow at a given relative exercise intensity has no effect on the inherent blood flow variability. Therefore, during exercise, muscle mass does not appear to be a determinant of the hyperemic response.
运动诱导的充血通常会根据肌肉量进行标准化处理,并且有时会在相对运动强度下评估该值,以考虑肌肉募集情况。因此,本研究旨在更好地了解运动期间肌肉量对腿部血流量(LBF)的影响。通过多普勒超声对27名年轻健康男性受试者进行评估,这些受试者在三种绝对(5、15和25瓦)和三种相对[最大伸膝(KEmax)的20%、40%和60%]工作负荷下进行伸膝(KE)运动。大腿肌肉量(5.2 - 8.1千克)与静息时的LBF显著相关(r = 0.54;P = 0.004)。运动诱导的充血与绝对工作负荷呈线性相关,但个体间存在显著差异,变异系数记录如下(5瓦:17%;15瓦:16%;25瓦:16%)。在5、15或25瓦时,股四头肌肌肉量(1.5 - 2.7千克)与LBF不相关(r = 0.09 - 0.01;P = 0.7 - 0.9)。以股四头肌肌肉量对血流量进行标准化处理,并未改善每个绝对工作负荷下的变异系数(5瓦:21%;15瓦:21%;25瓦:22%),而在相对运动强度下进行额外评估则导致更大的变异性(KEmax的20%:29%;KEmax的40%:29%;KEmax的60%:27%)。当将受试者分为高有氧能力组和低有氧能力组时,也记录到了类似的结果。因此,与静息状态相比,运动期间的血流量与肌肉量无关,简单地对肌肉量进行标准化处理或在给定的相对运动强度下比较标准化血流量,对固有的血流量变异性没有影响。所以,在运动期间,肌肉量似乎不是充血反应的决定因素。