• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征后护理质量的前瞻性队列研究及推荐药物未处方原因分析

Quality of care after acute coronary syndromes in a prospective cohort with reasons for non-prescription of recommended medications.

作者信息

Auer Reto, Gencer Baris, Räber Lorenz, Klingenberg Roland, Carballo Sebastian, Carballo David, Nanchen David, Cornuz Jacques, Vader John-Paul, Vogt Pierre, Jüni Peter, Matter Christian M, Windecker Stephan, Lüscher Thomas Felix, Mach François, Rodondi Nicolas

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e93147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093147. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093147
PMID:24676282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3968068/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adherence to guidelines is associated with improved outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Clinical registries developed to assess quality of care at discharge often do not collect the reasons for non-prescription for proven efficacious preventive medication in Continental Europe. In a prospective cohort of patients hospitalized for an ACS, we aimed at measuring the rate of recommended treatment at discharge, using pre-specified quality indicators recommended in cardiologic guidelines and including systematic collection of reasons for non-prescription for preventive medications.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort with 1260 patients hospitalized for ACS, we measured the rate of recommended treatment at discharge in 4 academic centers in Switzerland. Performance measures for medication at discharge were pre-specified according to guidelines, systematically collected for all patients and included in a centralized database.

RESULTS

Six hundred and eighty eight patients(54.6%) were discharged with a main diagnosis of STEMI, 491(39%) of NSTEMI and 81(6.4%) of unstable angina. Mean age was 64 years and 21.3% were women. 94.6% were prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers at discharge when only considering raw prescription rates, but increased to 99.5% when including reasons non-prescription. For statins, rates increased from 98% to 98.6% when including reasons for non-prescription and for beta-blockers, from 82% to 93%. For aspirin, rates further increased from 99.4% to 100% and from to 99.8% to 100% for P2Y12 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a very high adherence to ACS guidelines for drug prescriptions at discharge when including reasons for non-prescription to drug therapy. For beta-blockers, prescription rates were suboptimal, even after taking into account reason for non-prescription. In an era of improving quality of care to achieve 100% prescription rates at discharge unless contra-indicated, pre-specification of reasons for non-prescription for cardiovascular preventive medication permits to identify remaining gaps in quality of care at discharge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01000701.

摘要

背景

遵循指南与急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者预后改善相关。在欧洲大陆,为评估出院时医疗质量而建立的临床登记系统通常不收集未开具已证实有效的预防性药物的原因。在一个因ACS住院的前瞻性队列患者中,我们旨在使用心脏病学指南中推荐的预先设定的质量指标,包括系统收集预防性药物未处方的原因,来衡量出院时推荐治疗的比例。

方法

在一个有1260例因ACS住院患者的前瞻性队列中,我们在瑞士的4个学术中心测量了出院时推荐治疗的比例。出院时药物治疗的绩效指标根据指南预先设定,为所有患者系统收集,并纳入一个集中数据库。

结果

688例患者(54.6%)出院时主要诊断为ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),491例(39%)为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI),81例(6.4%)为不稳定型心绞痛。平均年龄为64岁,女性占21.3%。仅考虑原始处方率时,94.6%的患者出院时开具了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂,但纳入未处方原因后,这一比例增至99.5%。对于他汀类药物,纳入未处方原因后,比例从98%增至98.6%;对于β受体阻滞剂,从82%增至93%。对于阿司匹林,比例从99.4%进一步增至100%,对于P2Y12抑制剂,从99.8%增至100%。

结论

当纳入药物治疗未处方的原因时,我们发现出院时对ACS指南中药物处方的遵循度非常高。对于β受体阻滞剂,即使考虑了未处方原因,处方率仍未达到最佳水平。在一个致力于提高医疗质量以实现出院时100%处方率(除非有禁忌证)的时代,预先设定心血管预防性药物未处方的原因有助于识别出院时医疗质量方面仍存在的差距。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01000701

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/3968068/0ed415956fa3/pone.0093147.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/3968068/0ed415956fa3/pone.0093147.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ff/3968068/0ed415956fa3/pone.0093147.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of care after acute coronary syndromes in a prospective cohort with reasons for non-prescription of recommended medications.急性冠状动脉综合征后护理质量的前瞻性队列研究及推荐药物未处方原因分析
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e93147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093147. eCollection 2014.
2
Optimal Medical Therapy Prescription in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Netherlands: A Multicenter Pilot Registry.荷兰急性冠状动脉综合征患者的最佳药物治疗处方:一项多中心试点登记研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2021 Mar;21(2):219-229. doi: 10.1007/s40256-020-00427-9.
3
Utilization of Evidence-Based Secondary Prevention Medications at the Time of Discharge in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in Qatar.卡塔尔急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者出院时基于证据的二级预防药物的使用情况。
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2016;14(4):394-403. doi: 10.2174/1570161114666160226150336.
4
Age and sex inequalities in the prescription of evidence-based pharmacological therapy following an acute coronary syndrome in Portugal: the EURHOBOP study.葡萄牙急性冠状动脉综合征后循证药物治疗处方中的年龄和性别不平等:EURHOBOP研究
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1401-8. doi: 10.1177/2047487313494580. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
5
[SECONDARY PREVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME HOSPITALIZED IN INTERNAL MEDICINE DEPARTMENTS].[内科住院急性冠脉综合征患者的二级预防]
Harefuah. 2015 May;154(5):299-302, 339-40.
6
Trends in optimal medical therapy at discharge and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Thailand.泰国急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院时最佳药物治疗趋势及临床结局。
J Cardiol. 2021 Jun;77(6):669-676. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Hospital revascularisation capability and quality of care after an acute coronary syndrome in Switzerland.瑞士急性冠状动脉综合征后的医院血管重建能力与医疗质量。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Feb 9;146:w14275. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14275. eCollection 2016.
8
In-hospital prescriptions of secondary-prevention medications for post-acute coronary syndrome patients in South Korea
.韩国急性冠状动脉综合征后患者二级预防药物的院内处方情况
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;56(1):1-11. doi: 10.5414/CP202986.
9
Trends in optimal medical therapy prescription and mortality after admission for acute coronary syndrome: a 9-year experience in a real-world setting.急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间最佳药物治疗方案和死亡率的变化趋势:真实世界 9 年经验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018 Apr 1;4(2):102-110. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy005.
10
Optimizing prevention and guideline-concordant care in Montenegro.优化黑山的预防和符合指南的护理。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug;217 Suppl:S32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.218. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking the Impact of Single Continuing Educational Activities: Navigating Complexity Through Insights from Real-World Evaluation and Contemporary Literature.重新思考单一继续教育活动的影响:通过来自现实世界评估和当代文献的见解应对复杂性
J CME. 2025 May 12;14(1):2498292. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2025.2498292. eCollection 2025.
2
Anatomy-Informed Multimodal Learning for Myocardial Infarction Prediction.用于心肌梗死预测的解剖学信息多模态学习
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024 May 27;5:837-845. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3403948. eCollection 2024.
3
Prescription Rates for Antiplatelet Therapy (APT) in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) - What Benchmark are We Aiming at in Continuing Medical Education (CME)?

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal trends in treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction among men and women in Switzerland between 1997 and 2011.瑞士 1997 年至 2011 年间男性和女性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死治疗的时间趋势。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012 Sep;1(3):183-91. doi: 10.1177/2048872612454021.
2
Treatment and outcomes of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes in relation to initial diagnostic impressions (insights from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE] and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events [CANRACE]).疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者的治疗和转归与初始诊断印象的关系(来自加拿大急性冠状动脉事件全球登记处[GRACE]和加拿大急性冠状动脉事件登记处[CANRACE]的见解)。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;111(2):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.018. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
3
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)中抗血小板治疗(APT)的处方率——在继续医学教育(CME)中我们的目标基准是什么?
J Eur CME. 2020 Oct 23;9(1):1836866. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2020.1836866.
4
Outcomes in CME/CPD - Special Collection: How to make the "pyramid" a perpetuum mobile.继续医学教育/持续专业发展特刊成果:如何让“金字塔”成为永动机。
J Eur CME. 2020 Oct 27;9(1):1832750. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2020.1832750.
5
The ectopic expression of meiCT genes promotes meiomitosis and may facilitate carcinogenesis.异位表达 meiCT 基因促进了有丝分裂,并可能促进了肿瘤的发生。
Cell Cycle. 2020 Apr;19(8):837-854. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2020.1743902. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Optimal Timing of Invasive Coronary Angiography following NSTEMI.非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行冠状动脉介入治疗的最佳时机。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Mar 3;2020:8513257. doi: 10.1155/2020/8513257. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.影响丹麦和瑞士协调健康数据收集、共享和链接的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 12;14(12):e0226015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226015. eCollection 2019.
8
Long-Term Quality of Prescription for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients: A Real World 1-Year Follow-Up Study.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的长期处方质量:一项真实世界的 1 年随访研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Feb;20(1):105-115. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00361-5.
9
Clinical impact of a structured secondary cardiovascular prevention program following acute coronary syndromes: A prospective multicenter healthcare intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征后结构化二级心血管预防计划的临床影响:一项前瞻性多中心医疗保健干预。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0211464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211464. eCollection 2019.
10
Prognosis of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular multimorbidity after acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征后心血管和非心血管多重合并症的预后。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195174. eCollection 2018.
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理的欧洲心脏病学会指南
Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
4
Cost of acute coronary syndrome in Switzerland in 2008.2008 年瑞士急性冠状动脉综合征的成本。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Aug 22;142:w13655. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13655. eCollection 2012.
5
Quality of care for myocardial infarction at academic and nonacademic hospitals.学术医院和非学术医院心肌梗死的护理质量。
Am J Med. 2012 Apr;125(4):365-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.11.015.
6
The Joint Commission's new tobacco-cessation measures--will hospitals do the right thing?联合委员会的新戒烟措施——医院会采取正确行动吗?
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 29;366(13):1172-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1115176. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
7
Differences in the use of guideline-recommended therapies among 14 European countries in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI.14 个欧洲国家行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者指南推荐疗法使用情况的差异。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Apr;20(2):218-28. doi: 10.1177/2047487312437060. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
8
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2012年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):e2-e220. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
9
Smoking cessation advice rates in US hospitals.美国医院的戒烟建议率。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Oct 10;171(18):1682-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.451.
10
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)管理工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(23):2999-3054. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236. Epub 2011 Aug 26.