• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

14 个欧洲国家行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者指南推荐疗法使用情况的差异。

Differences in the use of guideline-recommended therapies among 14 European countries in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI.

机构信息

Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Apr;20(2):218-28. doi: 10.1177/2047487312437060. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1177/2047487312437060
PMID:22345684
Abstract

AIMS

Despite common European Society of Cardiology recommendations, adherence to guideline therapy varies, both temporally and geographically. We sought to examine current differences in the use of guideline-recommended therapies among 14 European countries in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were obtained from the Antiplatelet Therapy Observational Registry (APTOR), a non-interventional, prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Medication data were captured through 1 year. The large majority of patients in the APTOR registry received statins at hospital discharge (89%) and remained on statins at 1 year (87%), a finding that was consistent across countries. Likewise, beta-blocker use was similar at discharge and 1 year (83 and 81%, respectively). There was large disparity in aspirin loading dose between countries, but the discharge maintenance dose was more consistent, with most receiving ≤ 100 mg (87%). While 95% of patients were discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy, 71% remained on both treatments by 1 year, with wide variation by country in 1-year use.

CONCLUSIONS

These data from the APTOR study provide key information on current European ACS patient care management from hospitalization through 1 year. Even with European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, variations in practice patterns exist among ACS patients treated with PCI between the 14 European countries studied, including the use of proven therapies, as well as appropriate duration and dosing of antiplatelet regimens. Efforts are needed to further explain why such variation exists and to continue to improve adherence to ESC guidelines to improve patient care.

摘要

目的

尽管有欧洲心脏病学会的普遍建议,但指南治疗的依从性在时间和地理上都存在差异。我们试图研究在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,14 个欧洲国家目前在指南推荐治疗方法的使用上存在哪些差异。

方法和结果

数据来自抗血小板治疗观察性登记(APTOR),这是一项非干预性、前瞻性观察队列研究,纳入接受 PCI 的 ACS 患者。通过 1 年时间获取药物治疗数据。在 APTOR 登记研究中,绝大多数患者在出院时接受了他汀类药物治疗(89%),并在 1 年内继续使用他汀类药物(87%),这一发现在各国都是一致的。同样,出院时和 1 年时β受体阻滞剂的使用率相似(分别为 83%和 81%)。各国之间阿司匹林负荷剂量存在很大差异,但出院维持剂量更为一致,大多数患者接受≤100mg 剂量(87%)。尽管 95%的患者出院时接受双联抗血小板治疗,但 1 年内仍有 71%的患者同时接受两种治疗,各国之间 1 年内的使用情况存在很大差异。

结论

APTOR 研究提供了关于目前欧洲 ACS 患者从住院到 1 年期间的关键护理管理信息。即使有了欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)的指南,在接受 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者中,14 个研究国家之间的实践模式仍存在差异,包括使用已证实的治疗方法,以及抗血小板方案的适当持续时间和剂量。需要努力进一步解释为什么会存在这种差异,并继续提高对 ESC 指南的依从性,以改善患者的护理。

相似文献

1
Differences in the use of guideline-recommended therapies among 14 European countries in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI.14 个欧洲国家行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者指南推荐疗法使用情况的差异。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Apr;20(2):218-28. doi: 10.1177/2047487312437060. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
2
Optimal medical therapy at discharge in patients with acute coronary syndromes: temporal changes, characteristics, and 1-year outcome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院时的最佳药物治疗:时间变化、特征及1年结局
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.040. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
3
Predictors, cost, and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome who receive optimal secondary prevention therapy: results from the antiplatelet treatment observational registries (APTOR).急性冠状动脉综合征患者接受最佳二级预防治疗的预测因素、成本和结局:抗血小板治疗观察性注册研究(APTOR)的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;170(2):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.10.057. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
4
A prospective observational study of treatment practice patterns in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Europe.一项在欧洲行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的治疗实践模式的前瞻性观察研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Feb;104(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.12.002.
5
Contemporary use of prasugrel in clinical practice: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.普拉格雷在临床实践中的当代应用:来自密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联盟的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):293-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000060. Epub 2013 May 14.
6
Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease.欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲心胸外科学会指南对稳定型冠状动脉疾病血运重建策略的影响:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的活动变化。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
7
Observational study of adherence to European clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndrome in revascularized versus non-revascularized patients - the CONNECT Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与非介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者欧洲临床实践指南依从性的观察性研究——CONNECT 研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Aug-Sep;103(8-9):437-46. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
8
The prevalence, predictors and outcomes of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI, an analysis from the PROMETHEUS registry.急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后指南指导的药物治疗的流行率、预测因素和结局:来自 PROMETHEUS 登记研究的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):E112-E119. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27860. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
Evidence-based medication use among Chinese patients with acute coronary syndromes at the time of hospital discharge and 1 year after hospitalization: results from the Clinical Pathways for Acute Coronary Syndromes in China (CPACS) study.中国急性冠脉综合征患者出院时及住院1年后的循证用药情况:中国急性冠脉综合征临床路径(CPACS)研究结果
Am Heart J. 2009 Mar;157(3):509-516.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.09.026. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
10
International data on supportive therapies at 1 year in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI: results from the APTOR study.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者1年支持性治疗的国际数据:APTOR研究结果
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011 Jun;18(3):518-25. doi: 10.1177/1741826710389382. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Guideline-directed medical therapy for secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with depression.抑郁症患者冠状动脉搭桥术后二级预防的指南导向性药物治疗
Int J Cardiol Heart Vessel. 2014 Mar 6;3:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.02.005. eCollection 2014 Jun.
2
Predictors of in-Hospital Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Interventional Treatment. An Analysis of Data from the RO-STEMI Registry.接受介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院内死亡的预测因素。RO-STEMI注册研究数据分析
Maedica (Bucur). 2015 Sep;10(4):295-303.
3
Patterns of antiplatelet drug use after a first myocardial infarction during a 10-year period.
10年期间首次心肌梗死后抗血小板药物的使用模式。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;83(3):632-641. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13139. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
4
Prehospital and in-hospital use of healthcare resources in patients surviving acute coronary syndromes: an analysis of the EPICOR registry.急性冠脉综合征存活患者院前及院内医疗资源的使用情况:EPICOR注册研究分析
Open Heart. 2016 Feb 24;3(1):e000347. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000347. eCollection 2016.
5
Adverse cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome with indications for anticoagulation.有抗凝指征的急性冠状动脉综合征中的不良心血管事件
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Aug;10(4):231-41. doi: 10.1177/1753944716634563. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
6
Combination evidence-based therapy is effective in the oldest 'old patients' following myocardial infarction. The "Salute e Benessere nell'Anziano" (SeBA) observational study.基于证据的联合治疗对老年心肌梗死患者有效。“老年患者的健康与福祉”(SeBA)观察性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;11(5):677-85. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1391-0. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
7
Evaluating the uptake and effects of the computerized decision support system NHGDoc on quality of primary care: protocol for a large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial.评估计算机化决策支持系统NHGDoc对初级保健质量的采用情况及效果:一项大规模整群随机对照试验方案
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 17;9:145. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0145-5.
8
Quality of care after acute coronary syndromes in a prospective cohort with reasons for non-prescription of recommended medications.急性冠状动脉综合征后护理质量的前瞻性队列研究及推荐药物未处方原因分析
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e93147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093147. eCollection 2014.