Krishnamoorthy Yuvaraj, Vijayageetha M, Saya Ganesh Kumar
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Indian J Community Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;46(1):70-74. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_208_20. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Nutrition of the elderly affects immunity and functional ability and leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Validation of a short-form (SF) scale will make the assessment easier for primary care physicians. Hence, the study was done to assess the validity and reliability of Mini-Nutritional Assessment-SF (MNA-SF) Questionnaire among elderly in Puducherry.
A cross-sectional study among 279 elderly was conducted in four villages of rural Puducherry. We have used three forms of MNA questionnaire. Diagnostic accuracy of the MNA-SF was assessed and internal consistency was interpreted using Cronbach's alpha.
The prevalence of malnutrition by the MNA full-form scale was 17.9%. Similar prevalence was reported by the body mass index (BMI) MNA-SF (16.5%), but calf-circumference (CC) MNA-SF overestimated the prevalence (38%). Sensitivity was higher in CC-MNA-SF (92%) when compared to BMI-MNA-SF (72%), while specificity was higher in BMI-MNA-SF (95.6%) when compared to CC-MNA-SF (73.8%). The positive predictive value was higher in BMI-MNA-SF (78.3%) when compared to CC-MNA-SF (43.4%), while the negative predictive value almost similar in both the scales. Reliability of the questionnaire showed the highest value for MNA full form (alpha = 0.71).
This shows that both the forms of MNA-SF (BMI-based, CC-based) were valid and can be recommended as a screening tool for the assessment of nutritional status of the elderly.
老年人的营养状况会影响免疫力和功能能力,并导致发病率和死亡率上升。验证一种简表(SF)量表将使初级保健医生的评估更加容易。因此,本研究旨在评估改良营养风险评估简表(MNA-SF)问卷在本地治里老年人中的有效性和可靠性。
在本地治里农村的四个村庄对279名老年人进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用了三种形式的MNA问卷。评估了MNA-SF的诊断准确性,并使用克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)解释内部一致性。
MNA全量表评估的营养不良患病率为17.9%。体重指数(BMI)MNA-SF报告的患病率与之相似(16.5%),但小腿围(CC)MNA-SF高估了患病率(38%)。与BMI-MNA-SF(72%)相比,CC-MNA-SF的敏感性更高(92%),而与CC-MNA-SF(73.8%)相比,BMI-MNA-SF的特异性更高(95.6%)。与CC-MNA-SF(43.4%)相比,BMI-MNA-SF的阳性预测值更高(78.3%),而两种量表的阴性预测值几乎相似。问卷的可靠性显示MNA全量表的值最高(α = 0.71)。
这表明两种形式的MNA-SF(基于BMI、基于CC)都是有效的,可作为评估老年人营养状况的筛查工具推荐使用。