Slusky Danna A, Does Monique, Metayer Catherine, Mezei Gabor, Selvin Steve, Buffler Patricia A
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;38(3):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
Data from the Northern California Childhood Leukemia Study (NCCLS) were used to assess whether selection bias may explain the association between residential magnetic fields (assessed by wire codes) and childhood leukemia as previously observed in case-control studies.
Wiring codes were calculated for participating cases, n=310; and non-participating cases, n=66; as well as for three control groups: first-choice participating, n=174; first-choice non-participating, n=252; and replacement (non-first choice participating controls), n=220.
Participating controls tended to be of higher socioeconomic status than non-participating controls, and lower socioeconomic status was related to higher wire-codes. The odds ratio (OR) for developing childhood leukemia associated with high wire-codes was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.64) when all cases were compared to all first-choice controls (participating and non-participating). The OR for developing childhood leukemia in the high current category was 1.43 (95% CI: 0.91, 2.26) when participating cases were compared to first-choice participating controls, but no associations were observed when participating cases were compared to non-participating controls (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.57) or to replacement controls (OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.60).
The observed risk estimates vary by type of control group, and no statistically significant association between wire codes and childhood leukemia is observed in the California population participating in the NCCLS.
利用北加利福尼亚儿童白血病研究(NCCLS)的数据,评估选择偏倚是否可以解释病例对照研究中先前观察到的居住磁场(通过电线编码评估)与儿童白血病之间的关联。
计算参与研究的病例(n = 310)、未参与研究的病例(n = 66)以及三个对照组的电线编码:首选参与组(n = 174)、首选未参与组(n = 252)和替代组(非首选参与对照组,n = 220)。
参与研究的对照组社会经济地位往往高于未参与研究的对照组,而较低的社会经济地位与较高的电线编码相关。当将所有病例与所有首选对照组(参与组和未参与组)进行比较时,与高电线编码相关的儿童白血病发病优势比(OR)为1.18(95%置信区间:0.85,1.64)。当将参与研究的病例与首选参与对照组进行比较时,高电流类别中儿童白血病发病的OR为1.43(95%置信区间:0.91,2.26),但当将参与研究的病例与未参与研究的对照组(OR = 1.06,95%置信区间:0.71,1.57)或替代对照组(OR = 1.06,95%置信区间:0.71,1.60)进行比较时,未观察到关联。
观察到的风险估计值因对照组类型而异,在参与NCCLS的加利福尼亚人群中,未观察到电线编码与儿童白血病之间存在统计学上的显著关联。