• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IV 型骨中牙种植体的存留时间:一项系统评价

Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review.

作者信息

Goiato M C, dos Santos D M, Santiago J F, Moreno A, Pellizzer E P

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracatuba Dental School, UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;43(9):1108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016
PMID:24679842
Abstract

Bone quality and quantity are important factors with regard to the survival rate of dental implants. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of dental implants inserted in low-density bone and to determine the survival rate of dental implants with surface treatments over time. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken by two independent individuals; the Medline/PubMed database was searched for the period July 1975 to March 2013. Relevant reports on bone quality and osseointegration of dental implants were selected. The search retrieved 1018 references, and after inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 19 studies were selected for review. A total of 3937 patients, who had received a total of 12,465 dental implants, were analyzed. The survival rates of dental implants according to the bone density were: type I, 97.6%; type II, 96.2%; type III, 96.5%; and type IV, 88.8%. The survival rate of treated surface implants inserted in low-density bone was higher (97.1%) than that of machined surface implants (91.6%). Surface-treated dental implants inserted in low-density bone have a high survival rate and may be indicated for oral rehabilitation. However, more randomized studies are required to better evaluate this issue.

摘要

骨质量和骨量是影响牙种植体存活率的重要因素。本研究旨在对植入低密度骨的牙种植体进行系统评价,并确定经过表面处理的牙种植体随时间推移的存活率。由两名独立人员对文献进行系统评价;检索了1975年7月至2013年3月期间的Medline/PubMed数据库。选择了关于牙种植体骨质量和骨整合的相关报告。检索到1018篇参考文献,应用纳入和排除标准后,选择了19项研究进行综述。共分析了3937例患者,他们总共接受了12465颗牙种植体。根据骨密度,牙种植体的存活率分别为:I型,97.6%;II型,96.2%;III型,96.5%;IV型,88.8%。植入低密度骨的经过处理表面的种植体的存活率(97.1%)高于机械加工表面种植体(91.6%)。植入低密度骨的经过表面处理的牙种植体具有较高的存活率,可用于口腔修复。然而,需要更多的随机研究来更好地评估这个问题。

相似文献

1
Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review.IV 型骨中牙种植体的存留时间:一项系统评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;43(9):1108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.上颌窦提升术对骨内种植体存留率的影响。一项系统评价。
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328.
3
Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.上颌窦提升术用于牙种植修复的有效性:一项Cochrane系统评价
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26.
4
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.缺失牙修复干预措施:牙种植体不同的加载时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD003878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003878.pub5.
5
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants.缺失牙修复干预措施:不同类型的牙种植体
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22(7):CD003815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub4.
6
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.缺失牙修复干预措施:上颌窦增量手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD008397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008397.pub2.
7
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla.缺失牙修复干预措施:颧骨种植体用于严重上颌骨牙列缺失的修复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD004151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004151.
8
The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review.轴向种植体与倾斜种植体周围边缘骨的转归:一项系统评价
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7 Suppl 2:S171-89.
9
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla.缺失牙修复干预措施:颧骨种植体用于严重上颌骨牙列缺失的修复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 5;2013(9):CD004151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004151.pub3.
10
What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review.固定修复的最佳种植体数量:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:217-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02548.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Low-Dose rhBMP-2 and Vacuum Plasma Treatments on Titanium Implants for Osseointegration and Bone Regeneration.低剂量重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2和真空等离子体处理对钛种植体骨整合和骨再生的评估
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;18(15):3582. doi: 10.3390/ma18153582.
2
Predictive factors for insertion torque values in transalveolar sinus lift procedures.经牙槽窦提升术植入扭矩值的预测因素。
BDJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;11(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00297-w.
3
Biomechanical Evaluation of Cantilevered 2-Unit Implant-Supported Prostheses: A 3D Finite Element Study.
悬臂式双单位种植体支持修复体的生物力学评估:一项三维有限元研究
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun;75(3):1913-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
4
A Comparison of Deep Learning vs. Dental Implantologists in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Bone Quality Classification.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描的骨质量分类中深度学习与牙种植学家的比较
J Imaging Inform Med. 2024 Nov 18. doi: 10.1007/s10278-024-01317-1.
5
Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Modified Lekholm and Zarb Bone Quality Classification Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An Observatsion Study.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描的改良Lekholm和Zarb骨质量分类的可重复性和再现性:一项观察性研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Jul 11;14(4):278-286. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_291_21. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
6
Multi-objective optimization of custom implant abutment design for enhanced bone remodeling in single-crown implants using 3D finite element analysis.采用三维有限元分析对单冠种植体增强骨重塑的定制种植体基台设计进行多目标优化。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 9;14(1):15867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66807-2.
7
Retrospective study of a serie of pterygoid implants.回顾性研究一系列翼状种植体。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024 Sep 1;29(5):e650-e654. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26633.
8
A study on the morphology of iliac crest based on the objectives of jaw bone defect reconstruction.基于颌骨缺损重建目标的髂嵴形态学研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 21;28(7):390. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05764-6.
9
A naïve comparison to assess the success of ultra-short implants.一种用于评估超短种植体成功率的简单比较。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Apr;15(1):121-130. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_82_22. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
10
Addition of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 to the graft materials improves the clinical outcomes of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus.在移植材料中添加重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2可改善植入上颌窦移植部位的种植体的临床效果。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Apr;19(2):865-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.08.020. Epub 2023 Aug 30.