Nang Khin Mya, Ismail Abdul Jabbar, Tangaperumal Anithaa, Wynn Aye Aye, Thein Tin Tin, Hayati Firdaus, Teh Yong Guang
Department of Pathology & Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 15;11:1137960. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1137960. eCollection 2023.
The Greulich and Pyle's Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist (GP Atlas) is the most widely used method of determining the bone age (BA) of a child. It is also a widely accepted method for forensic age determination. As there is limited local bone age data for forensic age estimation, the purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GP Atlas for forensic age determination in living Sabahan children.
This study recruited 182 children between the ages of 9 years to 18 years. BA estimation of the left-hand anteroposterior radiographs were performed by two experienced radiologists using the Greulich-Pyle method.
The BA estimates from two radiologists had very high interobserver reliability (ICC 0.937) and a strong positive interobserver correlation (r > 0.90). The GP method, significantly and consistently underestimated chronological age (CA) by 0.7, 0.6 and 0.7 years in overall children, boys and girls respectively with minimal errors. Mean absolute error and root of mean squared error for overall children was 1.5 and 2.2 years respectively, while mean absolute percentage error was 11.6%. This underestimation was consistent across all age groups but was statistically significant only at 13-13.9 and 17-18.9 years old age groups.
Despite high interobserver reliability of BA estimation using the GP Atlas, this method consistently underestimates the age of the child in all children to a significant degree, for both boys and girls across all age groups, with an acceptably low level of error metrics. Our findings suggest that locally validated GP Atlas or other type of assessments (artificial intelligence or machine learning) are needed for assessment of BA to accurately predict CA, since current GP Atlas standards significantly underestimated chronological age with minimal error for children in Sabah. A larger population-based study would be necessary for establishing a validated atlas of a bone age in Malaysia.
格伦利希和派尔的《手部与腕部骨骼发育放射图谱》(GP图谱)是确定儿童骨龄(BA)最常用的方法。它也是法医年龄判定中广泛接受的方法。由于用于法医年龄估计的本地骨龄数据有限,本研究的目的是评估GP图谱在沙巴州在世儿童法医年龄判定中的准确性。
本研究招募了182名年龄在9岁至18岁之间的儿童。由两名经验丰富的放射科医生使用格伦利希-派尔方法对左手前后位X光片进行骨龄估计。
两名放射科医生的骨龄估计具有非常高的观察者间可靠性(ICC 0.937)和很强的观察者间正相关性(r>0.90)。GP方法在总体儿童、男孩和女孩中分别显著且持续低估实际年龄(CA)0.7、0.6和0.7岁,误差最小。总体儿童的平均绝对误差和均方根误差分别为1.5岁和2.2岁,而平均绝对百分比误差为11.6%。这种低估在所有年龄组中都是一致的,但仅在13 - 13.9岁和17 - 18.9岁年龄组具有统计学意义。
尽管使用GP图谱进行骨龄估计具有较高的观察者间可靠性,但该方法在所有年龄组的所有儿童中,无论男孩还是女孩,都在很大程度上持续低估儿童年龄,且误差指标处于可接受的低水平。我们的研究结果表明,需要经过本地验证的GP图谱或其他类型的评估(人工智能或机器学习)来评估骨龄以准确预测实际年龄,因为目前的GP图谱标准显著低估了沙巴州儿童的实际年龄,且误差最小。有必要进行一项基于更大规模人群的研究来建立马来西亚骨龄的验证图谱。