• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘制一个强大的“噢呐哈”:利用网络分析和 GIS 提高全州预防虐待和忽视儿童联盟的效力。

Mapping one strong 'Ohana: using network analysis and GIS to enhance the effectiveness of a statewide coalition to prevent child abuse and neglect.

机构信息

Social Science Research Institute, Office of Evaluation and Needs Assessment Services, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Saunders Hall, Suite 704, 2424 Maile Way, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA,

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(3-4):346-56. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9641-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10464-014-9641-7
PMID:24682889
Abstract

Network analysis and GIS enable the presentation of meaningful data about organizational relationships and community characteristics, respectively. Together, these tools can provide a concrete representation of the ecological context in which coalitions operate, and may help coalitions identify opportunities for growth and enhanced effectiveness. This study uses network analysis and GIS mapping as part of an evaluation of the One Strong 'Ohana (OSO) campaign. The OSO campaign was launched in 2012 via a partnership between the Hawai'i Children's Trust Fund (HCTF) and the Joyful Heart Foundation. The OSO campaign uses a collaborative approach aimed at increasing public awareness of child maltreatment and protective factors that can prevent maltreatment, as well as enhancing the effectiveness of the HCTF Coalition. This study focuses on three elements of the OSO campaign evaluation: (1) Network analysis exploring the relationships between 24 active Coalition member organizations, (2) GIS mapping of responses to a randomized statewide phone survey (n = 1,450) assessing awareness of factors contributing to child maltreatment, and (3) Combined GIS maps and network data, illustrating opportunities for geographically-targeted coalition building and public awareness activities.

摘要

网络分析和 GIS 分别能够呈现有关组织关系和社区特征的有意义数据。这些工具一起可以为联盟运作的生态背景提供具体的表示形式,并帮助联盟确定增长和提高效率的机会。本研究使用网络分析和 GIS 制图作为对“一个坚强的大家庭”(OSO)运动评估的一部分。OSO 运动于 2012 年通过夏威夷儿童信托基金(HCTF)和欢乐之心基金会之间的合作伙伴关系发起。OSO 运动采用合作方法,旨在提高公众对虐待儿童和预防虐待的保护因素的认识,并提高 HCTF 联盟的效力。本研究侧重于 OSO 运动评估的三个要素:(1)探索 24 个活跃联盟成员组织之间关系的网络分析,(2)对全州随机电话调查(n=1450)的响应进行 GIS 制图,评估导致虐待儿童的因素的认识,以及(3)结合 GIS 地图和网络数据,说明针对地理区域的联盟建设和公众意识活动的机会。

相似文献

1
Mapping one strong 'Ohana: using network analysis and GIS to enhance the effectiveness of a statewide coalition to prevent child abuse and neglect.绘制一个强大的“噢呐哈”:利用网络分析和 GIS 提高全州预防虐待和忽视儿童联盟的效力。
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(3-4):346-56. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9641-7.
2
Partnership capacity for community health improvement plan implementation: findings from a social network analysis.社区健康改善计划实施的伙伴关系能力:社会网络分析的结果
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 13;16:566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3194-7.
3
Health coalition collaboration network, perceived satisfaction and success.健康联盟协作网络、感知满意度和成功。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Oct 12;34(8):885-897. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-04-2020-0120.
4
Aligning Partners in Pediatric Health: Using Geographical Information Systems to Plan Community Coalitions.《儿科保健合作伙伴关系:利用地理信息系统规划社区联盟》。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720940513. doi: 10.1177/2150132720940513.
5
Factors related to partner involvement in development of the US national physical activity plan.与美国国家身体活动计划制定相关的伴侣参与因素。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun;19(3 Suppl 1):S8-S16. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318284047d.
6
Building a neighborhood network: interorganizational collaboration to prevent child abuse and neglect.建立社区网络:组织间合作预防儿童虐待和忽视。
Soc Work. 1997 May;42(3):255-64. doi: 10.1093/sw/42.3.255.
7
Community health coalitions in context: associations between geographic context, member type and length of membership with coalition functions.背景下的社区健康联盟:地理背景、成员类型和成员资格时长与联盟功能之间的关联
Health Educ Res. 2014 Oct;29(5):715-29. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu028. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
8
Assessing Rural Health Coalitions Using the Public Health Logic Model: A Systematic Review.运用公共卫生逻辑模型评估农村卫生联盟:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jun;58(6):864-878. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.015.
9
Children's Agricultural Safety Network: Evaluating Organizational Effectiveness and Impacts.儿童农业安全网络:评估组织有效性和影响
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(2):105-15. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1010067.
10
Ecological contexts in the development of coalitions for youth violence prevention: an organizational network analysis.生态背景下的青少年暴力预防联盟发展:组织网络分析。
Health Educ Behav. 2012 Oct;39(5):526-37. doi: 10.1177/1090198111419656. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Health promotion networks in two districts in Bavaria, Germany: an exploratory case study mapping networks with respect to thematic agenda and location.德国巴伐利亚州两个地区的健康促进网络:主题议程和位置的网络映射探索性案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 27;11:1111642. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1111642. eCollection 2023.
2
Interventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map.应对机构内儿童虐待的干预措施:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;17(1):e1139. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1139. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
NETWORK STRUCTURE, MULTIPLEXITY, AND EVOLUTION AS INFLUENCES ON COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY INTERVENTIONS.
网络结构、多重性和演变对基于社区的参与性干预措施的影响
J Community Psychol. 2016 Aug;44(6):781-798. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21801. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
4
Network Analysis in Community Psychology: Looking Back, Looking Forward.社区心理学中的网络分析:回顾与展望。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Sep;60(1-2):279-295. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12158. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Integrating Systems Science and Community-Based Participatory Research to Achieve Health Equity.整合系统科学与基于社区的参与性研究以实现健康公平。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Feb;106(2):215-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302944. Epub 2015 Dec 21.