• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种声学分析系统的定量与描述性比较:元音测量

Quantitative and descriptive comparison of four acoustic analysis systems: vowel measurements.

作者信息

Burris Carlyn, Vorperian Houri K, Fourakis Marios, Kent Ray D, Bolt Daniel M

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Feb;57(1):26-45. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0103).

DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0103)
PMID:24687465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3972630/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examines accuracy and comparability of 4 trademarked acoustic analysis software packages (AASPs): Praat, WaveSurfer, TF32, and CSL by using synthesized and natural vowels. Features of AASPs are also described.

METHOD

Synthesized and natural vowels were analyzed using each of the AASP's default settings to secure 9 acoustic measures: fundamental frequency (F0), formant frequencies (F1-F4), and formant bandwidths (B1-B4). The discrepancy between the software measured values and the input values (synthesized, previously reported, and manual measurements) was used to assess comparability and accuracy. Basic AASP features are described.

RESULTS

Results indicate that Praat, WaveSurfer, and TF32 generate accurate and comparable F0 and F1-F4 data for synthesized vowels and adult male natural vowels. Results varied by vowel for women and children, with some serious errors. Bandwidth measurements by AASPs were highly inaccurate as compared with manual measurements and published data on formant bandwidths.

CONCLUSIONS

Values of F0 and F1-F4 are generally consistent and fairly accurate for adult vowels and for some child vowels using the default settings in Praat, WaveSurfer, and TF32. Manipulation of default settings yields improved output values in TF32 and CSL. Caution is recommended especially before accepting F1-F4 results for children and B1-B4 results for all speakers.

摘要

目的

本研究通过使用合成元音和自然元音,检验4种商标声学分析软件包(AASP):Praat、WaveSurfer、TF32和CSL的准确性和可比性。还描述了AASP的特点。

方法

使用每个AASP的默认设置分析合成元音和自然元音,以获取9种声学测量值:基频(F0)、共振峰频率(F1 - F4)和共振峰带宽(B1 - B4)。软件测量值与输入值(合成值、先前报告的值和手动测量值)之间的差异用于评估可比性和准确性。描述了AASP的基本特征。

结果

结果表明,Praat、WaveSurfer和TF32为合成元音和成年男性自然元音生成准确且可比的F0和F1 - F4数据。女性和儿童的结果因元音而异,存在一些严重误差。与手动测量以及已发表的共振峰带宽数据相比,AASP的带宽测量极不准确。

结论

对于成年元音和一些儿童元音,使用Praat、WaveSurfer和TF32中的默认设置时,F0和F1 - F4的值通常是一致且相当准确的。在TF32和CSL中对默认设置进行操作可产生改进的输出值。特别是在接受儿童的F1 - F4结果和所有说话者的B1 - B4结果之前,建议谨慎。

相似文献

1
Quantitative and descriptive comparison of four acoustic analysis systems: vowel measurements.四种声学分析系统的定量与描述性比较:元音测量
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Feb;57(1):26-45. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0103).
2
Optimizing Vowel Formant Measurements in Four Acoustic Analysis Systems for Diverse Speaker Groups.针对不同说话者群体,优化四种声学分析系统中的元音共振峰测量
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Aug 1;25(3):335-54. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-15-0020.
3
Source and Filter Acoustic Measures of Young, Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults for Application in Vowel Synthesis.用于元音合成的青年、中年和老年人的声源与滤波器声学参数
J Voice. 2024 Mar;38(2):253-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.025. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
A Comparison of Healthy and Disordered Voices Using Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, Praat, and TF32.使用多维语音程序、Praat 和 TF32 对健康和失调声音进行比较。
J Voice. 2024 Jul;38(4):963.e23-963.e38. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.01.010. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Acoustic analysis of vowel formant frequencies in genetically-related and non-genetically related speakers with implications for forensic speaker comparison.对具有遗传和非遗传关系的发音人元音共振峰频率的声学分析及其对法庭说话人比较的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 18;16(2):e0246645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246645. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of Praat and Computerized Speech Lab for formant analysis of five Japanese vowels in maxillectomy patients.Praat与计算机语音实验室用于上颌骨切除患者五个日语元音共振峰分析的比较。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 1;17:1098197. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1098197. eCollection 2023.
7
Synthesis fidelity and time-varying spectral change in vowels.元音的合成保真度与时变频谱变化
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Feb;117(2):886-95. doi: 10.1121/1.1852549.
8
Vowel Production in Children and Adults With Down Syndrome: Fundamental and Formant Frequencies of the Corner Vowels.唐氏综合征儿童和成人的元音发音:拐角元音的基频和共振峰频率。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1208-1239. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00510. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
9
Vowel space characteristics and vowel identification accuracy.元音空间特征与元音识别准确率。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Jun;51(3):574-85. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/041).
10
The Formant Bandwidth as a Measure of Vowel Intelligibility in Dysphonic Speech.共振峰带宽作为衡量嗓音障碍语音中元音可懂度的指标。
J Voice. 2023 Mar;37(2):173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Acoustic assessment in mandarin-speaking Parkinson's disease patients and disease progression monitoring and brain impairment within the speech subsystem.华语帕金森病患者的声学评估以及言语子系统内的疾病进展监测和脑损伤
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024 Jun 12;10(1):115. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00720-3.
2
Conducting high-quality and reliable acoustic analysis: A tutorial focused on training research assistants.进行高质量且可靠的声学分析:面向培训研究助理的教程。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Apr 1;155(4):2603-2611. doi: 10.1121/10.0025536.
3
Comparison of Praat and Computerized Speech Lab for formant analysis of five Japanese vowels in maxillectomy patients.Praat与计算机语音实验室用于上颌骨切除患者五个日语元音共振峰分析的比较。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 1;17:1098197. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1098197. eCollection 2023.
4
Profiles and predictors of onset based differences in vocal characteristics of adults with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).成人听觉神经病谱系障碍(ANSD)患者发声特征基于发病情况的差异概况及预测因素。
J Otol. 2022 Oct;17(4):218-225. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2022.08.001. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
5
Formants are easy to measure; resonances, not so much: Lessons from Klatt (1986).共振峰易于测量,共鸣则不然:克拉特(1986)的经验教训。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Aug;152(2):933. doi: 10.1121/10.0013410.
6
Baseline Stimulability Predicts Patterns of Response to Traditional and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder.基线可刺激度预测传统和超声生物反馈治疗残余语音障碍的反应模式。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Aug 17;65(8):2860-2880. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00161. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Effects of Practice Variability on Second-Language Speech Production Training.练习变异性对二语言语产生训练的影响。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2021;73(5):384-400. doi: 10.1159/000510621. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
8
Effects of sampling rate and type of anti-aliasing filter on linear-predictive estimates of formant frequencies in men, women, and children.采样率和抗混叠滤波器类型对男性、女性和儿童的共振峰频率线性预测估计的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Mar;147(3):EL221. doi: 10.1121/10.0000824.
9
Corner vowels in males and females ages 4 to 20 years: Fundamental and F1-F4 formant frequencies.4 至 20 岁男性和女性的拐角元音:基频和 F1-F4 共振峰频率。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3255. doi: 10.1121/1.5131271.
10
Static measurements of vowel formant frequencies and bandwidths: A review.元音共振峰频率和带宽的静态测量:综述。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Jul-Aug;74:74-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of voice acquisition methodologies in speech research.语音研究中语音采集方法的比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):982-7. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.982.
2
A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab.通过语音博士软件和计算机语音实验室对嗓音进行声学测量的比较研究。
J Voice. 2005 Jun;19(2):187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.03.004.
3
Influence of data acquisition environment on accuracy of acoustic voice quality measurements.数据采集环境对声学语音质量测量准确性的影响。
J Voice. 2005 Jun;19(2):176-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.07.012.
4
Digital data collection and analysis: application for clinical practice.数字数据收集与分析:临床实践中的应用
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2004 Apr;35(2):112-21. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2004/013).
5
Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech.语音声学方面的描述性分析。
Logos. 1962 Apr;5:3-17.
6
Some acoustic characteristics in the voices of 6- to 10-year-old children and adults: a comparative sex and developmental perspective.6至10岁儿童与成人声音的一些声学特征:性别与发育的比较视角
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2000;25(3):122-32. doi: 10.1080/14015430050175851.
7
Vocal tract resonance characteristics of adults with obstructive sleep apnea.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停成人的声道共振特征。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1997 Sep;117(5):760-3. doi: 10.3109/00016489709113474.
8
Developmental aspects of formant frequency and bandwidth in infants and toddlers.
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1997;49(2):88-95. doi: 10.1159/000266442.
9
Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement.用于微扰测量的语音分析系统比较。
J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Feb;39(1):126-34. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3901.126.
10
Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation measurements among three analysis systems.
J Voice. 1995 Dec;9(4):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80200-0.