• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为急诊科严重脓毒症患者血管升压药使用预测指标的休克指数

The shock index as a predictor of vasopressor use in emergency department patients with severe sepsis.

作者信息

Wira Charles R, Francis Melissa W, Bhat Sundeep, Ehrman Robert, Conner David, Siegel Mark

机构信息

Yale University, Department of Emergency Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Stanford/Kaiser Emergency Medicine Program, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;15(1):60-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18472.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18472
PMID:24696751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3952891/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Severe sepsis is a leading cause of non-coronary death in hospitals across the United States. Early identification and risk stratification in the emergency department (ED) is difficult because there is limited ability to predict escalation of care. In this study we evaluated if a sustained shock index (SI) elevation in the ED was a predictor of short-term cardiovascular collapse, defined as vasopressor dependence within 72 hours of initial presentation.

METHODS

Retrospective dual-centered cross-sectional study using patients identified in the Yale-New Haven Hospital Emergency Medicine sepsis registry.

RESULTS

We included 295 patients in the study with 47.5% (n=140) having a sustained SI elevation in the ED. Among patients with a sustained SI elevation, 38.6% (54 of 140) required vasopressors within 72 hours of ED admission contrasted to 11.6% (18 of 155) without a sustained SI elevation (p=0.0001; multivariate modeling OR 4.42 with 95% confidence intervals 2.28-8.55) . In the SI elevation group the mean number of organ failures was 4.0 ± 2.1 contrasted to 3.2 ± 1.6 in the non-SI elevation group (p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

ED patients with severe sepsis and a sustained SI elevation appear to have higher rates of short-term vasopressor use, and a greater number of organ failures contrasted to patients without a sustained SI elevation. An elevated SI may be a useful modality to identify patients with severe sepsis at risk for disease escalation and cardiovascular collapse.

摘要

引言

严重脓毒症是美国各医院非冠状动脉死亡的主要原因。在急诊科(ED)进行早期识别和风险分层很困难,因为预测治疗升级的能力有限。在本研究中,我们评估了急诊科持续的休克指数(SI)升高是否是短期心血管衰竭的预测指标,短期心血管衰竭定义为首次就诊后72小时内对血管加压药的依赖。

方法

采用耶鲁-纽黑文医院急诊医学脓毒症登记处确定的患者进行回顾性双中心横断面研究。

结果

我们纳入了295例患者进行研究,其中47.5%(n = 140)在急诊科有持续的SI升高。在SI持续升高的患者中,38.6%(140例中的54例)在急诊科入院后72小时内需要血管加压药,而在没有持续SI升高的患者中这一比例为11.6%(155例中的18例)(p = 0.0001;多变量模型OR为4.42,95%置信区间为2.28 - 8.55)。在SI升高组,器官衰竭的平均数量为4.0±2.1,而在非SI升高组为3.2±1.6(p = 0.0001)。

结论

与没有持续SI升高的患者相比,患有严重脓毒症且SI持续升高的急诊科患者似乎短期使用血管加压药的比例更高,器官衰竭的数量更多。SI升高可能是一种有用的方法,用于识别有疾病进展和心血管衰竭风险的严重脓毒症患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a3/3952891/fc0e38da3a4b/i1936-900X-15-1-60-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a3/3952891/fc0e38da3a4b/i1936-900X-15-1-60-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a3/3952891/fc0e38da3a4b/i1936-900X-15-1-60-f01.jpg

相似文献

1
The shock index as a predictor of vasopressor use in emergency department patients with severe sepsis.作为急诊科严重脓毒症患者血管升压药使用预测指标的休克指数
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;15(1):60-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18472.
2
Evaluation of a novel 5-group classification system of sepsis by vasopressor use and initial serum lactate in the emergency department.评估在急诊科使用血管加压药和初始血清乳酸的新型 5 分组脓毒症分类系统。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;13(2):257-268. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1607-y. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
3
Lactate Clearance Predicts Survival Among Patients in the Emergency Department with Severe Sepsis.乳酸清除率可预测急诊科严重脓毒症患者的生存率。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1118-26. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.27577. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Predicting septic shock in patients with sepsis at emergency department triage using systolic and diastolic shock index.使用收缩压和舒张压休克指数预测急诊科分诊的脓毒症患者发生感染性休克。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;78:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.029. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
5
Disease progression in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis.以脓毒症为主诉就诊于急诊科且血流动力学稳定的患者的疾病进展。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):383-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00664.x.
6
Comparison of qSOFA with current emergency department tools for screening of patients with sepsis for critical illness.qSOFA 与现有急诊科工具在筛查脓毒症患者是否发生重症的比较。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):350-356. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207383. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
An Emergency Department Validation of the SEP-3 Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions and Comparison With 1992 Consensus Definitions.急诊科对SEP-3脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的验证及与1992年共识定义的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):544-552.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
Mechanical ventilation and acute lung injury in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.机械通气与严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克急诊科患者的急性肺损伤:一项观察性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):659-69. doi: 10.1111/acem.12167.
9
Shock Index As A Predictor Of Hyperlactatemia For Early Detection Of Severe Sepsis In Patients Presenting To The Emergency Department Of A Low To Middle Income Country.休克指数作为预测低中收入国家急诊科就诊严重脓毒症患者高乳酸血症的指标。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(4):465-469.
10
Risk factors for mortality despite early protocolized resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.急诊科对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克进行早期规范化复苏后仍存在的死亡风险因素。
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Shock indices are associated with in-hospital mortality among patients with septic shock and normal left ventricular ejection fraction.在感染性休克且左心室射血分数正常的患者中,休克指数与院内死亡率相关。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 12;19(3):e0298617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298617. eCollection 2024.
2
Complementary value of the Shock Index v. the Modified Shock Index in the prediction of in-hospital intensive care unit admission and mortality: A single-centre experience.休克指数与改良休克指数在预测住院重症监护病房入住率和死亡率方面的互补价值:单中心经验
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 3;29(2). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2023.v29i2.286. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Shock index correlates with extravasation on angiographs of gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a logistics regression analysis.休克指数与胃肠道出血血管造影的造影剂外渗相关:一项逻辑回归分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):861-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9131-5. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
2
National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments.美国急诊科严重脓毒症的全国性评估。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1928-36. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000277043.85378.C1.
3
Epidemiology of severe sepsis around the world.
[Correlation between the shock index and the anaerobic index].
[休克指数与无氧代谢指数之间的相关性]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 May 2;61(3):307-313.
4
Performance of point-of-care severity scores to predict prognosis in patients admitted through the emergency department with COVID-19.基于急诊就诊的 COVID-19 患者,床边严重程度评分对预后预测的表现。
J Hosp Med. 2023 May;18(5):413-423. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13106. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
5
Shock Index and Characteristics of "Bounce-Back" Patients in the Emergency Department of King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC): A Retrospective Analysis.阿卜杜拉国王医疗城急诊科“反弹”患者的休克指数及特征:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2022 Sep 28;14(9):e29692. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29692. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Effects of growth trajectory of shock index within 24 h on the prognosis of patients with sepsis.24小时内休克指数的生长轨迹对脓毒症患者预后的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 22;9:898424. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.898424. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of the Relationship Between SI and RASI Scores With the Outcome of Sepsis Patients.SI与RASI评分之间的关系与脓毒症患者结局的比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;9:872725. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.872725. eCollection 2022.
8
A scoping review of barriers, facilitators and tools to escalation of care processes in the emergency department.急诊科医疗照护升级过程中障碍、促进因素和工具的范围综述
CJEM. 2022 Apr;24(3):300-312. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00268-2. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
9
Predicting mortality in trauma patients - A retrospective comparison of the performance of six scoring systems applied to polytrauma patients from the emergency centre of a South African central hospital.预测创伤患者的死亡率——对应用于南非一家中心医院急诊科多发伤患者的六种评分系统性能的回顾性比较
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;11(4):453-458. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Identifying the Sickest During Triage: Using Point-of-Care Severity Scores to Predict Prognosis in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Sepsis.在分诊中识别最病重的患者:使用床边严重程度评分预测疑似脓毒症的急诊科患者的预后。
J Hosp Med. 2021 Aug;16(8):453-461. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3642.
全球严重脓毒症的流行病学
Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2006 Jun;6(2):207-12. doi: 10.2174/187153006777442332.
4
The incidence and outcome of septic shock patients in the absence of early-goal directed therapy.在缺乏早期目标导向治疗的情况下,感染性休克患者的发病率和预后。
Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R80. doi: 10.1186/cc4918. Epub 2006 May 16.
5
Severity of emergency department hypotension predicts adverse hospital outcome.急诊科低血压的严重程度可预测不良的医院结局。
Shock. 2004 Nov;22(5):410-4. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000142186.95718.82.
6
Cardiac troponin I predicts myocardial dysfunction and adverse outcome in septic shock.心肌肌钙蛋白I可预测感染性休克患者的心肌功能障碍及不良预后。
Int J Cardiol. 2004 May;95(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.02.005.
7
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2001年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2003 Jun 4(335):1-29.
8
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.1979年至2000年美国败血症的流行病学情况。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1546-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022139.
9
2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference.2001年危重病医学会/欧洲重症监护医学学会/美国胸科医师学会/美国胸科学会/危重病医学学会国际脓毒症定义会议。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B.
10
Shock index in the first trimester of pregnancy and its relationship to ruptured ectopic pregnancy.妊娠早期的休克指数及其与异位妊娠破裂的关系。
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Feb;9(2):115-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb00226.x.