Markar S R, Karthikesalingam A, Low D E
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Department of Outcomes Research, St George's hospital, London, UK.
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Jul;28(5):468-75. doi: 10.1111/dote.12214. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis is to determine the effect of enhanced recovery programs (ERP) on clinical outcome measures following esophagectomy. Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings, and reference lists were searched for trials comparing clinical outcome from esophagectomy followed by a conventional pathway with esophagectomy followed by an ERP. Primary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative mortality, anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications, and secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and the incidence of 30-day readmission. Nine studies were included comprising 1240 patients, 661 patients underwent esophagectomy followed conventional pathway, and 579 patients underwent ERP. Utilization of ERP was associated with a reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leak (12.2-8.3%; pooled odds ratios = 0.61; 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96; P = 0.03) and pulmonary complications (29.1-19.6%; pooled odds ratios = 0.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.36 to 0.77; P = 0.001) and length of hospital stay, and no significant change in postoperative mortality or readmission rate. There was significant variation in the design of enhanced recovery protocols, surgical approach, and utilization of neoadjuvant therapies between the studies that are important confounding variables to be considered. This study suggests a benefit to the utilization of ERP following esophagectomy. The pathways provide a template for all medical personnel interacting with these patients in order to provide incremental changes in all aspects of clinical care that translates into global improvements seen in postoperative outcomes.
本系统评价和汇总分析的目的是确定强化康复计划(ERP)对食管癌切除术后临床结局指标的影响。检索了Medline、Embase、试验注册库、会议论文集和参考文献列表,以查找比较食管癌切除术后采用传统路径与采用ERP的临床结局的试验。主要结局为术后死亡率、吻合口漏和肺部并发症的发生率,次要结局为住院时间和30天再入院率。纳入9项研究,共1240例患者,661例患者接受食管癌切除术后采用传统路径,579例患者接受ERP。采用ERP与吻合口漏发生率降低(12.2%-8.3%;汇总比值比=0.61;95%置信区间=0.39至0.96;P=0.03)、肺部并发症发生率降低(29.1%-19.6%;汇总比值比=0.52;95%置信区间=0.36至0.77;P=0.001)以及住院时间缩短相关,术后死亡率或再入院率无显著变化。各研究之间在强化康复方案的设计、手术方式和新辅助治疗的应用方面存在显著差异,这些是需要考虑的重要混杂变量。本研究表明食管癌切除术后采用ERP有益。这些路径为所有与这些患者打交道的医务人员提供了一个模板,以便在临床护理的各个方面进行渐进式改变,从而转化为术后结局的全面改善。