Wielpütz Mark O, Heußel Claus P, Herth Felix J F, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Pneumology and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Mar 14;111(11):181-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0181.
Chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) each have characteristic advantages and disadvantages that need to be considered in clinical decision-making. This point is discussed in reference to the main types of lung disease that are encountered in practice.
A selective literature search was performed in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Existing clinical guidelines on the main types of lung disease and studies concerning radiological diagnosis were also con - sidered in this review.
There have been no more than a few large-scale, controlled comparative trials of different radiological techniques. Chest X-ray provides general orientation as an initial diagnostic study and is especially useful in the diagnosis of pneumonia, cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Multi-detector CT affords nearly isotropic spatial resolution at a radiation dose of only 0.2-5 mSv, much lower than before. Its main indications, according to current guidelines, are tumors, acute pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, advanced COPD, and pneumonia in a high-risk patient. MRI is used in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, and bronchial carcinoma. The positive predictive value (PPV) of a chest X-ray in outpatients with pneumonia is only 27% (gold standard, CT); in contrast, an initial, non-randomized trial of MRI in nosocomial pneumonia revealed a PPV of 95%. For the staging of mediastinal lymph nodes in bronchial carcinoma, MRI has a PPV of 88% and positron emission tomography with CT (PET/CT) has a PPV of 79%, while CT alone has a PPV of 41% (gold standard, histology).
The choice of radiologicalal technique for the detection, staging, follow-up, and quantification of lung disease should be based on the individual clinical options, so that appropriate treatment can be provided without excessive use of diagnostic testing.
胸部X线、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)各有其独特的优缺点,在临床决策时均需加以考虑。本文结合实际工作中遇到的主要肺部疾病类型对此进行讨论。
在PubMed和谷歌学术数据库中进行了选择性文献检索。本综述还参考了现有的关于主要肺部疾病类型的临床指南以及有关放射学诊断的研究。
针对不同放射学技术的大规模、对照比较试验为数不多。胸部X线作为初步诊断检查可提供大致方向,在肺炎、癌症和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的诊断中尤其有用。多排CT在仅0.2 - 5 mSv的辐射剂量下就能提供近乎各向同性的空间分辨率,远低于以往。根据当前指南,其主要适应证为肿瘤、急性肺栓塞、肺动脉高压、肺纤维化、晚期COPD以及高危患者的肺炎。MRI用于诊断囊性纤维化、肺栓塞、肺动脉高压和支气管癌。胸部X线对门诊肺炎患者的阳性预测值(PPV)仅为27%(金标准为CT);相比之下,一项针对医院获得性肺炎的MRI初步非随机试验显示PPV为95%。对于支气管癌纵隔淋巴结分期,MRI的PPV为88%,正电子发射断层扫描联合CT(PET/CT)的PPV为79%,而单纯CT的PPV为41%(金标准为组织学检查)。
在选择用于肺部疾病检测、分期、随访和定量的放射学技术时,应基于个体临床情况,以便在不过度进行诊断检查的情况下提供适当治疗。