Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;113(10):1674-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.022. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
The goal of treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) is often to control symptoms. It remains unclear whether targets for treatment such as AF rate or AF burden are correlated with AF symptom severity. Two hundred eighty-six patients completed a questionnaire of their general health and well-being, including a detailed AF symptom assessment immediately followed by a 7-day continuous monitor. AF characteristics assessed from the monitor included AF burden, AF rate, sinus rhythm rate, frequency and severity of pauses, and premature atrial contraction or premature ventricular contraction burden. Characteristics were analyzed separately for patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Symptom severity was assessed using the University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale. Monitor characteristics were compared with AF symptom severity. The mean age of the cohort was 61.8 years and the majority of subjects were male (65.4%). Co-morbidities included hypertension (64.5%), sleep apnea (38.4%), congestive heart failure (19.6%), and diabetes (16.4%). In those with persistent or paroxysmal AF, there were no significant predictors of AF symptom severity. Specifically, heart rate in AF or sinus rhythm, AF burden, or premature atrial contraction or premature ventricular contraction burden was not predictive of AF symptom severity. After adjusting for potential cofounders (including age, gender, and co-morbidities), these findings persisted. In conclusion, there is no value in using AF monitor characteristics to predict symptoms in patients with AF.
房颤(AF)治疗的目标通常是控制症状。目前尚不清楚治疗目标(如 AF 率或 AF 负荷)是否与 AF 症状严重程度相关。286 名患者完成了一份关于他们整体健康和幸福感的问卷,包括对 AF 症状的详细评估,随后立即进行了为期 7 天的连续监测。从监测中评估的 AF 特征包括 AF 负荷、AF 率、窦性节律率、暂停的频率和严重程度以及房性早搏或室性早搏负荷。对阵发性或持续性 AF 患者分别进行特征分析。使用多伦多大学房颤严重程度量表评估症状严重程度。比较监测特征与 AF 症状严重程度。队列的平均年龄为 61.8 岁,大多数患者为男性(65.4%)。合并症包括高血压(64.5%)、睡眠呼吸暂停(38.4%)、充血性心力衰竭(19.6%)和糖尿病(16.4%)。在持续性或阵发性 AF 患者中,AF 症状严重程度没有显著的预测因素。具体来说,AF 或窦性节律中的心率、AF 负荷或房性早搏或室性早搏负荷并不能预测 AF 症状严重程度。在调整了潜在混杂因素(包括年龄、性别和合并症)后,这些发现仍然存在。总之,使用 AF 监测特征来预测 AF 患者的症状没有价值。