Chakraborty Suhash, Kommu John Vijay Sagar, Srinath Shoba, Seshadri Shekhar P, Girimaji Satish C
HAL Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Department of Child Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;36(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.127243.
Early intervention in specific learning disability (SpLD) results in better outcome and prevents comorbidity. Understanding the pathways is therefore important.
To study and compare the pathways to care for children with SpLD and mental retardation (MR) before reaching a tertiary care center.
A cross-sectional study was conducted for pathways to care of two groups: SpLD and MR with 50 children in each group from 8 to 16 years. MINI-KID for comorbidity and Goldberg's pathway to care instrument was used. The groups were divided into early contact (up to three carers) and late contact (more than three carers) and compared.
Data were analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10.0 software.
Majority (n = 24 or 48%) of SpLD children visited "others" (teachers, neighbors, relatives, and guardians of fellow classmates) as first carer. Allopathic practitioners were the first choice for MR children (n = 31 or 62%). Six children (12%) in SpLD group and 10 of MR (20%) group have seen either traditional practitioner or healer as first carer. Maximum referral to the tertiary center in both groups was done by others (62% in SpLD and 56% in MR group). Early contacts in SpLD group belonged to younger age group (P = 0.01). While comparing both groups on the basis of early and late contact, mother's education was found to be significant in early contact group (P = 0.036) and having comorbidity was significant among late contacts (P = 0.038).
The pathways to care for SpLD children are more or less similar to MR children whose parents recognize MR late. Both the groups visit multiple carers including traditional healers substantiating the strong belief for supernatural causation of developmental disorders in India.
对特定学习障碍(SpLD)进行早期干预可带来更好的结果并预防合并症。因此,了解其途径很重要。
研究并比较SpLD和智力障碍(MR)儿童在进入三级护理中心之前的就医途径。
设置与设计 材料与方法:对SpLD和MR两组儿童的就医途径进行横断面研究,每组50名8至16岁的儿童。使用MINI-KID评估合并症,并采用戈德堡就医途径工具。将两组分为早期接触(最多三位照顾者)和晚期接触(超过三位照顾者)并进行比较。
使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)10.0版软件对数据进行分析。
大多数SpLD儿童(n = 24或48%)首先就诊于“其他人”(教师、邻居、亲戚和同班同学的监护人)。全科医生是MR儿童的首选(n = 31或62%)。SpLD组中有6名儿童(12%),MR组中有10名儿童(20%)首先就诊于传统医生或治疗师。两组中向三级中心的最大转诊均由其他人完成(SpLD组为62%,MR组为56%)。SpLD组的早期接触者年龄较小(P = 0.01)。在根据早期和晚期接触比较两组时,发现母亲的教育程度在早期接触组中有显著意义(P = 0.036),而合并症在晚期接触者中具有显著意义(P = 0.038)。
SpLD儿童的就医途径与父母较晚认识到MR的MR儿童大致相似。两组都会就诊于包括传统治疗师在内的多位照顾者,这证实了印度对发育障碍超自然病因的强烈信念。