• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不锈钢和钛合金正畸微螺钉种植体的比较:机械和组织学分析。

Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.

机构信息

Former resident, Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Ind.

Associate professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Dental Biomaterials, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Ind.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Apr;145(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.022
PMID:24703288
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The detailed mechanical and histologic properties of stainless steel miniscrew implants used for temporary orthodontic anchorage have not been assessed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare them with identically sized titanium alloy miniscrew implants.

METHODS

Forty-eight stainless steel and 48 titanium alloy miniscrew implants were inserted into the tibias of 12 rabbits. Insertion torque and primary stability were recorded. One hundred grams of tensile force was applied between half of the implants in each group, resulting in 4 subgroups of 24 specimens each. Fluorochrome labeling was administered at weeks 4 and 5. When the rabbits were euthanized at 6 weeks, stability and removal torque were measured in half (ie, 12 specimens) of each of the 4 subgroups. Microdamage burden and bone-to-implant contact ratio were quantified in the other 12 specimens in each subgroup. Mixed model analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

All implants were stable at insertion and after 6 weeks. The only significant difference was the higher (9%) insertion torque for stainless steel. No significant differences were found between stainless steel and titanium alloy miniscrew implants in microdamage burden and bone-to-implant contact regardless of loading status.

CONCLUSIONS

Stainless steel and titanium alloy miniscrew implants provide the same mechanical stability and similar histologic responses, suggesting that both are suitable for immediate orthodontic clinical loads.

摘要

简介

用于临时正畸锚固的不锈钢微型植入物的详细机械和组织学特性尚未得到评估。因此,本研究的目的是将其与相同尺寸的钛合金微型植入物进行比较。

方法

将 48 个不锈钢和 48 个钛合金微型植入物植入 12 只兔子的胫骨中。记录植入扭矩和初始稳定性。在每组的一半植入物之间施加 100 克的拉力,产生 4 个每组 24 个样本的亚组。在第 4 和第 5 周进行荧光标记。当兔子在 6 周时被安乐死时,在每组的一半(即 12 个样本)中测量稳定性和去除扭矩。在每个亚组的其余 12 个样本中量化微损伤负担和骨-植入物接触比。使用混合模型方差分析进行统计分析。

结果

所有植入物在插入时和 6 周后均稳定。唯一的显著差异是不锈钢的插入扭矩高(9%)。无论加载状态如何,不锈钢和钛合金微型植入物的微损伤负担和骨-植入物接触比均无显著差异。

结论

不锈钢和钛合金微型植入物提供相同的机械稳定性和相似的组织学反应,表明两者均适合立即进行正畸临床负荷。

相似文献

1
Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis.不锈钢和钛合金正畸微螺钉种植体的比较:机械和组织学分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Apr;145(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.022.
2
Effect of force on alveolar bone surrounding miniscrew implants: a 3-dimensional microcomputed tomography study.力对微螺钉种植体周围牙槽骨的影响:一项三维微计算机断层扫描研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):32-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.01.016.
3
Mechanical properties evaluation of an orthodontic miniscrew system for skeletal anchorage.正畸微螺钉支抗系统机械性能评估。
Prog Orthod. 2010;11(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.04.014. Epub 2010 May 15.
4
Comparative analysis of anchorage systems for micro implant orthodontics.微种植体支抗正畸中各种锚固系统的比较分析。
Prog Orthod. 2010;11(2):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.正畸微螺钉种植体的植入扭矩和去除扭矩值。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):669-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.11.017.
6
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength, stability, and stress distribution in orthodontic anchorage: a conical, self-drilling miniscrew implant system.正畸支抗的强度、稳定性和应力分布的三维有限元分析:一种锥形自攻微型螺钉种植体系统。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Mar;141(3):327-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.022.
7
Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.不同种植体材料对正畸微种植体初期稳定性的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Dec;28(12):673-8. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.04.037. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
8
Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.自攻式正畸微种植体即刻加载的潜力。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Apr;137(4):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.030.
9
Evaluation of the surface characteristics of anodic oxidized miniscrews and their impact on biomechanical stability: An experimental study in beagle dogs.阳极氧化微型螺钉的表面特性评估及其对生物力学稳定性的影响:一项在比格犬身上进行的实验研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.020.
10
Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implants.回收的正畸微螺钉种植体的特性分析
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):10.e1-7; discussion 10-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Orthodontic Mini-Implants' Stability Based on Insertion and Removal Torques: An Experimental Study.基于植入和拆除扭矩评估正畸微型种植体的稳定性:一项实验研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 20;12(5):549. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050549.
2
Extra-alveolar miniscrews: are all brands similar?牙槽外微型螺钉:所有品牌都相似吗?
Dental Press J Orthod. 2025 Mar 24;30(1):e2524221. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524221.oar. eCollection 2025.
3
Insertion torque, flexural strength and surface alterations of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic mini-implants: an in vitro study.
不锈钢和钛合金正畸微种植体的植入扭矩、弯曲强度和表面变化:一项体外研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 May 20;29(2):e2423282. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.2.e2423282.oar. eCollection 2024.
4
Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a bibliometric analysis of the 50 most-cited articles from 2012 to 2022.正畸学中的临时锚固装置:2012 年至 2022 年 50 篇被引频次最高文献的计量分析。
Angle Orthod. 2023 Sep 1;93(5):591-602. doi: 10.2319/010923-18.1.
5
Analysis of Torque Maintenance and Fracture Resistance after Fatigue in Retention Screws Made of Different Metals for Screw-Retained Implant-Borne Prosthesis Joints.用于螺丝固位种植体支持式修复体连接的不同金属固位螺丝疲劳后扭矩保持和抗断裂性分析
Int J Dent. 2021 Nov 18;2021:9693239. doi: 10.1155/2021/9693239. eCollection 2021.
6
Improved Biological Responses of Titanium Coating Using Laser-Aided Direct Metal Fabrication on SUS316L Stainless Steel.利用激光辅助直接金属制造技术在SUS316L不锈钢上制备钛涂层,改善其生物学反应。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;14(14):3947. doi: 10.3390/ma14143947.
7
Mechanical strength of stainless steel and titanium alloy mini-implants with different diameters: an experimental laboratory study.不同直径的不锈钢和钛合金微种植体的机械强度:一项实验性实验室研究。
Prog Orthod. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40510-021-00352-w.
8
The correlation among gripping volume, insertion torque, and pullout strength of micro-implant.微型种植体的握持体积、植入扭矩和拔出强度之间的相关性。
J Dent Sci. 2020 Dec;15(4):500-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Stainless steel or titanium mini-implants?不锈钢或钛迷你种植体?
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jul 1;90(4):587-597. doi: 10.2319/081619-536.1.
10
Effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone density on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.皮质骨厚度和松质骨密度对正畸微型种植体初期稳定性的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2019 Dec;14(4):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jul 20.