Suppr超能文献

牙槽外微型螺钉:所有品牌都相似吗?

Extra-alveolar miniscrews: are all brands similar?

作者信息

Borsato Karina Tostes, Bernardino Raissa Mariele, Campos Lucas Arrais, Bento Daniela Águida, Vaz Luiz Geraldo, Gandini Júnior Luiz Gonzaga

机构信息

São Paulo State University, Dental School, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Morphology (Araraquara/SP, Brazil).

Tampere University Hospital (Tampere, Finland).

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2025 Mar 24;30(1):e2524221. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.30.1.e2524221.oar. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A wide variety of extra-alveolar orthodontic miniscrews are available.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe and compare the design, and the topographical and mechanical properties of five distinct commercial brands of extra-alveolar miniscrews.

METHODS

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using 25×, 50×, 100×, and 200× photomicrographs, and in-vitro mechanical tests (driving torque, torsion, and pullout test) to compare extra-alveolar miniscrews (n=80, 2 mm x 12 mm) from the following brands: Bioray, DatSteel, Morelli, OBS, and Peclab.

RESULTS

Despite the 2 × 12 mm screw size, only the Morelli and Peclab miniscrews actually measured 12 mm in thread length. The studied brands revealed different thread characteristics (i.e., thread pitch and minor/major diameter). The Morelli miniscrews presented the smallest thread pitch and, consequently, the largest number of threads. Bioray, DatSteel, and OBS miniscrews presented a trapezoidal thread shape, while the others were triangular. SEM showed adequate polishing on the Morelli, OBS, and Peclab miniscrews. The insertion torque was higher than the removal torque for the DatSteel, Morelli, and OBS miniscrews during the driving torque test of the first four threads. The same result occurred with Morelli miniscrews during the driving torque test of the full screw. The resistance limits recorded in the pullout tests were significantly higher than the maximum force used in orthodontic tooth movement. The findings showed no significant differences between the results of the titanium and steel miniscrews.

CONCLUSIONS

The five types of miniscrews studied presented different characteristics, so the clinician must consider the correct size, number of threads, length, polishing surface, and metallic alloy when choosing the appropriate miniscrew for an application.

摘要

引言

市面上有各种各样的牙槽外正畸微螺钉。

目的

本研究旨在描述和比较五种不同商业品牌的牙槽外微螺钉的设计、表面形貌和力学性能。

方法

使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM),拍摄25倍、50倍、100倍和200倍的显微照片,并进行体外力学测试(驱动扭矩、扭转和拔出测试),以比较以下品牌的牙槽外微螺钉(n = 80,2毫米×12毫米):Bioray、DatSteel、Morelli、OBS和Peclab。

结果

尽管螺钉尺寸为2×12毫米,但只有Morelli和Peclab微螺钉的螺纹长度实际测量为12毫米。所研究的品牌显示出不同的螺纹特征(即螺距和小径/大径)。Morelli微螺钉的螺距最小,因此螺纹数量最多。Bioray、DatSteel和OBS微螺钉呈现梯形螺纹形状,而其他的是三角形。扫描电子显微镜显示Morelli、OBS和Peclab微螺钉有适当的抛光。在前四圈螺纹的驱动扭矩测试中,DatSteel、Morelli和OBS微螺钉的插入扭矩高于拆卸扭矩。在整个螺钉的驱动扭矩测试中,Morelli微螺钉也出现了相同的结果。拔出测试中记录的阻力极限明显高于正畸牙齿移动中使用的最大力。研究结果表明,钛合金和钢质微螺钉的测试结果之间没有显著差异。

结论

所研究的五种微螺钉呈现出不同的特性,因此临床医生在为特定应用选择合适的微螺钉时,必须考虑正确的尺寸、螺纹数量、长度、抛光表面和金属合金。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验