Suppr超能文献

评估年轻竞技运动员心血管性猝死发生率的策略。

Strategies for assessing the prevalence of cardiovascular sudden deaths in young competitive athletes.

作者信息

Maron Barry J, Murphy Caleb J, Haas Tammy S, Ahluwalia Aneesha, Garberich Ross F

机构信息

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;173(3):369-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Prevalence/incidence of sudden death due to cardiovascular disease in young competitive athletes has become an important part of the debate over the most effective and practical preparticipation screening strategies for this population. Since event reporting is not mandatory, identification of cases has been achieved largely through publicly available data and internet searches. The accuracy of this methodology has not been studied and deserves scrutiny.

METHODS

We assessed recognition of sudden cardiovascular deaths in college (NCAA) athletes with the U.S. National Registry of Sudden Death in Athletes that uses largely public domain sources, and also the NCAA Memorial Resolutions List.

RESULTS

For 2002-2011, 64 total sudden death cases were identified by both sources. The Registry identified 56 cases (88%), including 14 not found in the NCAA List. The NCAA List identified 50 cases (78%), including 8 unrecognized by the Registry (p=0.16). Failure to initially recognize these 8 deaths using established Registry search mechanisms was due to the absence of key search terms in media reports. Cases not identified by the 2 methodologies did not differ significantly regarding demographics, cause of death, or sport.

CONCLUSIONS

Internet-based, public domain methodology is useful and identified more cases of sudden cardiovascular death in college athletes than did the internal list provided by the NCAA. Nevertheless, these findings support the principle that multiple sources are additive and beneficial in identifying the maximum number of sudden death events.

摘要

背景/目的:年轻竞技运动员心血管疾病导致的猝死发生率/发病率,已成为针对该人群最有效且实用的参赛前筛查策略辩论的重要组成部分。由于事件报告并非强制要求,病例识别很大程度上通过公开可用数据和互联网搜索来实现。这种方法的准确性尚未得到研究,值得仔细审查。

方法

我们使用主要来自公共领域来源的美国国家运动员猝死登记处,以及美国大学体育协会(NCAA)纪念决议清单,评估对大学(NCAA)运动员突发心血管死亡的识别情况。

结果

2002年至2011年期间,两个来源共识别出64例猝死病例。登记处识别出56例(88%),其中14例未在NCAA清单中找到。NCAA清单识别出50例(78%),其中8例未被登记处识别(p = 0.16)。使用既定的登记处搜索机制最初未能识别这8例死亡,是由于媒体报道中缺少关键搜索词。两种方法未识别出的病例在人口统计学、死因或运动项目方面无显著差异。

结论

基于互联网的公共领域方法是有用的,且比NCAA提供的内部清单识别出更多大学运动员突发心血管死亡病例。尽管如此,这些发现支持了多种来源在识别最大数量猝死事件方面具有累加性且有益的原则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验