• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a 14-gene risk score assay to target adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.一种14基因风险评分检测用于早期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗靶向治疗的成本效益分析
Oncologist. 2014 May;19(5):466-76. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0357. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
2
Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.采用 21 基因检测指导早期乳腺癌辅助化疗决策:德国环境下的成本效益评估。
J Med Econ. 2013;16(1):30-40. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.722572. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
3
Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant icotinib versus chemotherapy for patients with stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer in China.辅助伊可替尼对比化疗用于中国 II-IIIA 期 EGFR 突变非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 22;14(8):e081270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081270.
4
Time-Series Modeling and Simulation for Comparative Cost-Effective Analysis in Cancer Chemotherapy: An Application to Platinum-Based Regimens for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.癌症化疗中比较成本效益分析的时间序列建模与模拟:以晚期非小细胞肺癌铂类方案为例
Biol Pharm Bull. 2017;40(1):73-81. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b16-00623.
5
Addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cost-utility analysis.厄洛替尼联合一线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效用分析。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Mar;22(3):567-574. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq431. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
6
Cost-effectiveness of vinorelbine alone or vinorelbine plus cisplatin for stage IV NSCLC.长春瑞滨单药或长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗IV期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益
Oncology (Williston Park). 1998 Mar;12(3 Suppl 4):18-25; discussion 25-6.
7
Cost-effectiveness of adding rh-endostatin to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in China.中国晚期非小细胞肺癌一线化疗中添加 rh-endostatin 的成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2011 Oct;33(10):1446-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.帕博利珠单抗单药治疗与化疗用于既往未治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Sep;23(9):952-960. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1775620. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Cost-Utility of a Prognostic Test Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.一项指导早期非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗决策的预后测试的成本效益分析
Oncologist. 2016 Feb;21(2):196-204. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0162. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
10
Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information of Erlotinib, Afatinib, and Cisplatin-Pemetrexed for First-Line Treatment of Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.厄洛替尼、阿法替尼和顺铂-培美曲塞用于美国晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益和信息价值
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):774-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of precision diagnostic testing for precision medicine approaches against non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review.精准医学方法检测非小细胞肺癌的精准诊断测试的成本效益:系统评价。
Mol Oncol. 2021 Oct;15(10):2672-2687. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13038. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
2
Comprehensive Comparison Between Adjuvant Targeted Therapy and Chemotherapy for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者辅助靶向治疗与化疗的综合比较:一项成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 25;11:619376. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.619376. eCollection 2021.
3
Model-based effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of risk-based selection strategies for adjuvant chemotherapy in Dutch stage II colon cancer patients.荷兰II期结肠癌患者辅助化疗基于风险的选择策略的基于模型的有效性和成本效益
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 12;14:1756284821995715. doi: 10.1177/1756284821995715. eCollection 2021.
4
Towards decision-making using individualized risk estimates for personalized medicine: A systematic review of genomic classifiers of solid tumors.迈向使用个性化风险评估进行精准医疗决策:实体瘤基因组分类器的系统综述
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176388. eCollection 2017.
5
The Case for Adolescent HIV Vaccination in South Africa: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.南非青少年艾滋病毒疫苗接种的理由:成本效益分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(4):e2528. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002528.
6
Cost-Utility of a Prognostic Test Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.一项指导早期非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗决策的预后测试的成本效益分析
Oncologist. 2016 Feb;21(2):196-204. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0162. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of a Biopsy-Based 8-Protein Prostate Cancer Prognostic Assay to Optimize Treatment Decision Making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 Early Stage Prostate Cancer.一种基于活检的8蛋白前列腺癌预后检测方法在优化 Gleason 3+3和3+4早期前列腺癌治疗决策中的成本效益分析
Oncologist. 2015 Dec;20(12):1355-64. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0214. Epub 2015 Oct 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Chapter 3: Cohort life tables by smoking status, removing lung cancer as a cause of death.第三章:按吸烟状况划分的队列生命表,去除肺癌作为死亡原因。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01662.x.
2
Getting the methods right--the foundation of patient-centered outcomes research.选对方法——以患者为中心的结果研究的基础。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):787-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1207437. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
3
Genomic signatures for predicting survival and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.用于预测非小细胞肺癌患者生存和辅助化疗获益的基因组特征。
BMC Med Genomics. 2012 Jul 2;5:30. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-5-30.
4
Predictors of death, local recurrence, and distant metastasis in completely resected pathological stage-I non-small-cell lung cancer.完全切除的病理Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者的死亡、局部复发和远处转移的预测因素。
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jul;7(7):1115-23. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31824cbad8.
5
Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.老年非小细胞肺癌的辅助化疗:加拿大安大略省的一项基于人群的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1813-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.3330. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
The potential of exploiting DNA-repair defects for optimizing lung cancer treatment.利用 DNA 修复缺陷优化肺癌治疗的潜力。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 14;9(3):144-55. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.3.
7
A practical molecular assay to predict survival in resected non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer: development and international validation studies.一种实用的分子检测方法,可预测非小细胞肺癌(非鳞癌)切除术后的生存情况:开发和国际验证研究。
Lancet. 2012 Mar 3;379(9818):823-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61941-7. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
8
Cisplatin benefit is predicted by immunohistochemical analysis of DNA repair proteins in squamous cell carcinoma but not adenocarcinoma: theranostic modeling by NSCLC constituent histological subclasses.免疫组织化学分析鳞状细胞癌中 DNA 修复蛋白可预测顺铂获益,但对腺癌无效:非小细胞肺癌组织学亚类的治疗诊断模型。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Sep;23(9):2245-2252. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr624. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
9
Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020.美国癌症护理成本预测:2010-2020 年。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jan 19;103(2):117-28. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq495. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
10
ERCC1 and RRM1 in the international adjuvant lung trial by automated quantitative in situ analysis.采用自动化定量原位分析技术检测 ERCC1 和 RRM1 在国际辅助性肺试验中的表达。
Am J Pathol. 2011 Jan;178(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.029. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

一种14基因风险评分检测用于早期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗靶向治疗的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of a 14-gene risk score assay to target adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Roth Joshua A, Billings Paul, Ramsey Scott D, Dumanois Robert, Carlson Josh J

机构信息

Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA; Group Health Research Institute, Group Health, Seattle, Washington, USA; Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, California, USA; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2014 May;19(5):466-76. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0357. Epub 2014 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0357
PMID:24710309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4012962/
Abstract

Life Technologies has developed a 14-gene molecular assay that provides information about the risk of death in early stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients after surgery. The assay can be used to identify patients at highest risk of mortality, informing subsequent treatments. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this novel assay. Patients and Methods. We developed a Markov model to estimate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs for testing versus standard care. Risk-group classification was based on assay-validation studies, and chemotherapy uptake was based on pre- and post-testing recommendations from a study of 58 physicians. We evaluated three chemotherapy-benefit scenarios: moderately predictive (base case), nonpredictive (i.e., the same benefit for each risk group), and strongly predictive. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results. In the base case, testing and standard-care strategies resulted in 6.81 and 6.66 life years, 3.76 and 3.68 QALYs, and $122,400 and $118,800 in costs, respectively. The ICER was $23,200 per QALY (stage I: $29,200 per QALY; stage II: $12,200 per QALY). The ICER ranged from "dominant" to $92,100 per QALY in the strongly predictive and nonpredictive scenarios. The model was most sensitive to the proportion of high-risk patients receiving chemotherapy and the high-risk hazard ratio. The 14-gene risk score assay strategy was cost-effective in 68% of simulations. Conclusion. Our results suggest that the 14-gene risk score assay may be a cost-effective alternative to standard guideline-based adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

摘要

生命技术公司开发了一种14基因分子检测方法,可提供有关早期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者术后死亡风险的信息。该检测方法可用于识别死亡风险最高的患者,为后续治疗提供依据。本研究的目的是评估这种新型检测方法的成本效益。患者与方法。我们建立了一个马尔可夫模型,以估计预期寿命、质量调整生命年(QALY)以及检测与标准治疗的成本。风险组分类基于检测验证研究,化疗采用率基于对58名医生的一项研究中的检测前后建议。我们评估了三种化疗获益方案:中度预测性(基础病例)、非预测性(即每个风险组的获益相同)和强预测性。我们计算了增量成本效益比(ICER),并进行了单因素和概率敏感性分析。结果。在基础病例中,检测和标准治疗策略分别导致6.81和6.66个生命年、3.76和3.68个QALY以及122,400美元和118,800美元的成本。ICER为每QALY 23,200美元(I期:每QALY 29,200美元;II期:每QALY 12,200美元)。在强预测性和非预测性方案中,ICER范围从“占优”到每QALY 92,100美元。该模型对接受化疗的高危患者比例和高危风险比最为敏感。在68%的模拟中,14基因风险评分检测策略具有成本效益。结论。我们的结果表明,在早期非小细胞肺癌中,14基因风险评分检测可能是基于标准指南的辅助化疗决策的一种具有成本效益的替代方法。