de la Cruz Maxine, Reddy Akhila, Bruera Eduardo
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Houston, Texas.
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Apr;13(2):395-8. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514000157. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
Intrathecal analgesia and radiofrequency techniques for tumor ablation are employed for palliation of symptoms. These interventions are efficacious in a select number of patients for controlling pain and improving quality of life. Careful selection of an appropriate candidate must be performed to prevent needless, invasive, and costly interventions, as interventional pain management alone will not treat total pain in cancer patients. We describe here a patient who experienced intractable pain and unsuccessfully underwent cordotomy but responded to the interdisciplinary (IDT) palliative care approach in an acute palliative care unit (APCU).
A middle-aged female with ovarian cancer metastatic to the left psoas muscle and the supraclavicular and retroperitoneal lymph nodes was admitted with severe left thigh and flank pain. She had been unsuccessfully treated with different opioid regimens, hypogastric nerve block, epidural steroid injection, and cordotomy. The palliative care team was consulted while awaiting placement of an intrathecal pump. The patient was subsequently transferred to the APCU for symptom management and transition to hospice. On admission, her morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) was 660 mg. Our IDT--composed of a physician, fellow, nurse practitioner, counselor, chaplain, social worker, and physical and occupational therapists--was able to identify several sources of distress that likely contributed to her expression of pain. Our IDT focused on frequent counseling, improving her function, provided medication education, discussed goals of care, and educated about hospice. She was discharged to hospice care with good pain control and an 85% reduction in her MEDD.
An APCU approach involving an IDT alleviated the need for invasive interventions by diagnosing and treating the psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual distress contributing to the patient's total pain expression. Successful management must be reflective of rigorous assessment of the physical, psychological, spiritual, social, and practical aspects before consideration of more invasive treatments.
鞘内镇痛和射频肿瘤消融技术用于缓解症状。这些干预措施对部分患者控制疼痛和改善生活质量有效。必须仔细挑选合适的患者,以避免不必要的、侵入性的和昂贵的干预,因为仅介入性疼痛管理无法治疗癌症患者的全部疼痛。我们在此描述一名经历顽固性疼痛且脊髓切开术治疗失败,但在急性姑息治疗单元(APCU)对多学科(IDT)姑息治疗方法有反应的患者。
一名中年女性,卵巢癌转移至左腰大肌、锁骨上和腹膜后淋巴结,因左大腿和侧腹剧痛入院。她接受不同阿片类药物方案、腹下神经阻滞、硬膜外类固醇注射和脊髓切开术治疗均失败。在等待植入鞘内泵期间咨询了姑息治疗团队。患者随后被转至APCU进行症状管理并过渡到临终关怀。入院时,她的吗啡等效日剂量(MEDD)为660毫克。我们的IDT团队由一名医生、研究员、执业护士、顾问、牧师、社会工作者以及物理治疗师和职业治疗师组成,能够识别出可能导致她疼痛表达的几个痛苦来源。我们的IDT团队专注于频繁咨询、改善她的功能、提供药物教育、讨论护理目标并进行临终关怀教育。她出院接受临终关怀时疼痛得到良好控制,MEDD降低了85%。
涉及IDT的APCU方法通过诊断和治疗导致患者全部疼痛表达的心理社会、情感和精神痛苦,减少了侵入性干预的需求。在考虑更具侵入性的治疗之前,成功的管理必须反映对身体、心理、精神、社会和实际方面的严格评估。