• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clients' experiences of the Boston Psychiatric Rehabilitation Approach: a qualitative study.客户对波士顿精神病康复方法的体验:一项定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Apr 8;9:22916. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.22916. eCollection 2014.
2
Relatives' experiences of the Boston Psychiatric Rehabilitation approach: a qualitative study.亲属对波士顿精神疾病康复方法的体验:一项定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Apr 8;9:22918. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.22918. eCollection 2014.
3
A 2-year follow-up study of people with severe mental illness involved in psychosocial rehabilitation.一项针对参与社会心理康复的重症精神疾病患者的为期两年的随访研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;68(6):401-8. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.851737. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
4
Clients' experiences of one-to-one low-intensity interventions for common mental health problems: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.客户对常见心理健康问题的一对一低强度干预的体验:一种解释性现象学分析。
Psychol Psychother. 2019 Dec;92(4):565-583. doi: 10.1111/papt.12200. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Enhancing Clients' Communication Regarding Goals for Using Psychiatric Medications.加强客户在使用精神科药物目标方面的沟通。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Aug 1;68(8):771-775. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600418. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
Working with mental health problems: clients' experiences of IPS, vocational rehabilitation and employment.应对心理健康问题:客户在综合就业支持计划、职业康复和就业方面的经历。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;44(11):961-70. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0017-5. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
7
Boston Violence Intervention Advocacy Program: a qualitative study of client experiences and perceived effect.波士顿暴力干预倡导项目:一项关于客户体验和感知效果的定性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):742-51. doi: 10.1111/acem.12409. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
8
Clients' experiences of a work rehabilitation process.客户在工作康复过程中的经历。
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Apr 8;26(7):419-24. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001663111.
9
From recovery programs to recovery-oriented practice? A qualitative study of mental health professionals' experiences when facilitating a recovery-oriented rehabilitation program.从康复计划到以康复为导向的实践?一项关于心理健康专业人员在推动以康复为导向的康复计划时的经历的定性研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2015 Dec;29(6):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
10
How nursing students' perceptions of people with psychiatric disabilities change when using the strengths model during practicums: A qualitative research study.护理专业学生在实习期间使用优势模式时对精神疾病患者的认知如何变化:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Jul;138:106190. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106190. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the Boston University Approach to Psychiatric Rehabilitation in Improving Social Participation in People With Severe Mental Illnesses: A Randomized Controlled Trial.波士顿大学精神疾病康复方法对改善重度精神疾病患者社会参与度的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 23;11:571640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.571640. eCollection 2020.
2
Profiling of victimization, perpetration, and participation: A latent class analysis among people with severe mental illness.受害、施害和参与行为分析:严重精神疾病患者中的潜在类别分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 30;13(11):e0208457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208457. eCollection 2018.
3
Effectiveness of an intervention for managing victimization risks related to societal participation for persons with severe mental illness: a cluster RCT study protocol.干预措施对管理严重精神疾病患者与社会参与相关的受害风险的有效性:一项群组 RCT 研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 2;18(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1831-7.
4
Development of a Strategic Tool for Shared Decision-Making in the Use of Antidepressants among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Focus Group Study.开发一种用于指导伴有重性抑郁障碍的患者使用抗抑郁药的共享决策的策略工具:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):1402. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071402.
5
Shared decision-making in mental health care-A user perspective on decisional needs in community-based services.精神卫生保健中的共同决策——基于社区服务中服务对象对决策需求的视角
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 May 9;11:30563. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30563. eCollection 2016.
6
Perspectives on health and well-being in nursing.护理领域中关于健康与幸福的观点。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Apr 8;9:23026. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.23026. eCollection 2014.
7
Relatives' experiences of the Boston Psychiatric Rehabilitation approach: a qualitative study.亲属对波士顿精神疾病康复方法的体验:一项定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Apr 8;9:22918. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.22918. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
A 2-year follow-up study of people with severe mental illness involved in psychosocial rehabilitation.一项针对参与社会心理康复的重症精神疾病患者的为期两年的随访研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;68(6):401-8. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.851737. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
2
The therapeutic relationship and Mental Health Nursing: it is time to articulate what we do!治疗关系与心理健康护理:是时候阐明我们的工作内容了!
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Nov;19(9):839-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01944.x.
3
Societal participation: examining the impact of a rehabilitation approach for young people with schizophrenia.社会参与:考察一种针对精神分裂症青年的康复方法的影响。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Nov;19(9):792-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01854.x. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
4
Effectively working on rehabilitation goals: 24-month outcome of a randomized controlled trial of the Boston psychiatric rehabilitation approach.有效实施康复目标:波士顿精神康复方法随机对照试验的 24 个月结果。
Can J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;56(12):751-60. doi: 10.1177/070674371105601207.
5
Trust, choice and power in mental health care: experiences of patients with psychosis.信任、选择与权力:精神病患者的经历
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;58(5):496-504. doi: 10.1177/0020764011408658. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
6
"They can do whatever they want": Meanings of receiving psychiatric care based on a common staff approach.“他们可以为所欲为”:基于常见员工方法的精神科护理意义。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2011 Feb 4;6(1). doi: 10.3402/qhw.v6i1.5296.
7
[Rehabilitation research in the Netherlands; research review and synthesis of recent findings].[荷兰的康复研究;近期研究成果综述与综合分析]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2010;52(10):683-94.
8
Psychiatric rehabilitation interventions: a review.精神康复干预措施:综述。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(2):114-29. doi: 10.3109/09540261003730372.
9
Outcome study of first-episode schizophrenia in a developing country: quality of life and antipsychotics.发展中国家首发精神分裂症的结局研究:生活质量与抗精神病药物
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;44(2):143-50. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0415-0. Epub 2008 Jul 19.
10
The VADO approach in psychiatric rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.精神康复中的VADO方法:一项随机对照试验。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Dec;57(12):1778-83. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.12.1778.

客户对波士顿精神病康复方法的体验:一项定性研究。

Clients' experiences of the Boston Psychiatric Rehabilitation Approach: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Jormfeldt Henrika, Svensson Bengt, Hansson Lars, Svedberg Petra

机构信息

School of Social and Health Sciences, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden;

Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Apr 8;9:22916. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.22916. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3402/qhw.v9.22916
PMID:24717265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3982115/
Abstract

The Boston Psychiatric Rehabilitation Approach (BPR) is person-centered and characterized by being based entirely on the individual's unique needs and preferences in the areas of working, learning, social contacts, and living environment. Nevertheless, the person-centered approach is lacking firm evidence regarding outcomes, and empirical studies regarding clients' experiences of this particular model are needed. A qualitative content analysis of 10 transcribed semistructured individual interviews was used to describe and explore clients' experiences of the BPR during an implementation project in Sweden. The findings from the interviews could be summarized in "A sense of being in communion with self and others" theme, consisting of three categories: increased self-understanding, getting new perspectives, and being in a trusting relationship. The results showed that clients do not always recognize nor are able to verbalize their goals before they have been given the possibility to reflect their thoughts in collaboration with a trusted person. The guidelines of the approach are intended to support the clients' ability to participate in decision making regarding their own care. More research about efficacy of different rehabilitation approaches and exploration of fidelity to guidelines of rehabilitation programs are required.

摘要

波士顿精神康复方法(BPR)是以个人为中心的,其特点是完全基于个人在工作、学习、社交和生活环境等方面的独特需求和偏好。然而,以个人为中心的方法在结果方面缺乏确凿的证据,因此需要对客户在这种特定模式下的体验进行实证研究。在瑞典的一个实施项目中,采用了对10次转录的半结构化个人访谈进行定性内容分析的方法,以描述和探索客户对BPR的体验。访谈结果可以归纳为“与自我和他人交流的感觉”这一主题,包括三个类别:增强自我理解、获得新视角以及建立信任关系。结果表明,在客户有机会与信任的人合作反思自己的想法之前,他们并不总是能够认识到自己的目标,也无法将其表达出来。该方法的指导方针旨在支持客户参与有关自身护理的决策的能力。需要更多关于不同康复方法疗效的研究以及对康复项目指导方针忠诚度的探索。