• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Modifying the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories.改变非自愿自传体记忆的频率和特征。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 9;9(4):e89582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089582. eCollection 2014.
2
Involuntary autobiographical memories are relatively more often reported during high cognitive load tasks.在高认知负荷任务期间,非自愿性自传体记忆的报告相对更为频繁。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jan;182:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
The Effects of Instruction on the Frequency and Characteristics of Involuntary Autobiographical Memories.指导对非自愿自传体记忆的频率和特征的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 13;11(6):e0157121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157121. eCollection 2016.
4
Visual attentional load affects the frequency of involuntary autobiographical memories and their level of meta-awareness.视觉注意负荷会影响非自愿自传体记忆的频率及其元意识水平。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):117-129. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0854-0.
5
Why are we not flooded by involuntary autobiographical memories? Few cues are more effective than many.为什么我们没有被不由自主的自传体记忆淹没呢?线索少比线索多更有效。
Psychol Res. 2015 Nov;79(6):1077-85. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0632-y. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
6
Priming involuntary autobiographical memories in the lab.在实验室中启动非自愿性自传体记忆。
Memory. 2018 Feb;26(2):277-289. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1353102. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
7
Positive involuntary autobiographical memories: you first have to live them.积极的非自愿自传体记忆:你必须先经历它们。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Why are we not flooded by involuntary thoughts about the past and future? Testing the cognitive inhibition dependency hypothesis.为什么我们不会被关于过去和未来的不由自主的想法淹没?检验认知抑制依赖假说。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jun;83(4):666-683. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1120-6. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
9
Recurrent involuntary autobiographical memories: characteristics and links to mental health status.反复出现的无意识自传体记忆:特征及与心理健康状况的关联。
Memory. 2020 Jul;28(6):753-765. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1777312. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
Do intuitive ideas of the qualities that should characterize involuntary and voluntary memories affect their classification?内隐记忆和外显记忆的特征品质的直观概念是否会影响它们的分类?
Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):170-195. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01465-3. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Inhibitory Control Processes in Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM): A Single Case Study.探究超优自传体记忆(HSAM)中的抑制控制过程:一项单病例研究
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 21;8(1):20. doi: 10.5334/joc.421. eCollection 2025.
2
Dataset of autobiographical and future-related thoughts recorded during a laboratory vigilance task with working memory load manipulation.在一项带有工作记忆负荷操纵的实验室警觉任务中记录的自传体及与未来相关思想的数据集。
Data Brief. 2024 Aug 10;56:110831. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110831. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
A comprehensive guide to research protocols for collecting and coding involuntary past and future thoughts.收集和编码非自愿的过去及未来想法的研究方案综合指南。
MethodsX. 2024 Apr 23;12:102732. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102732. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The Subjective Experience of Autobiographical Remembering: Conceptual and Methodological Advances and Challenges.自传性记忆的主观体验:概念与方法的进展及挑战
J Intell. 2024 Feb 12;12(2):21. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020021.
5
Differences in autobiographical memories reported using text and voice during everyday life.日常生活中使用文本和语音报告自传体记忆的差异。
Memory. 2023 Mar;31(3):393-405. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2162084. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
6
Could direct and generative retrieval be two flips of the same coin? A dual-task paradigm study.直接检索和生成性检索会是同一枚硬币的两面吗?一项双任务范式研究。
Cogn Process. 2022 Aug;23(3):513-519. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01095-0. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
7
Investigating the role of involuntary retrieval in music-evoked autobiographical memories.探究非自愿提取在音乐诱发自传体记忆中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2022 Apr;100:103305. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103305. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
8
Episodic-semantic interactions in spontaneous thought.自发思维中的情景语义交互
Mem Cognit. 2022 Apr;50(3):641-654. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01211-z. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
Do intuitive ideas of the qualities that should characterize involuntary and voluntary memories affect their classification?内隐记忆和外显记忆的特征品质的直观概念是否会影响它们的分类?
Psychol Res. 2022 Feb;86(1):170-195. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01465-3. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
10
Involuntary autobiographical memories and their relation to other forms of spontaneous thoughts.不由自主的自传体记忆及其与其他形式的自发性思维的关系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Feb;376(1817):20190693. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0693. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Why am I remembering this now? Predicting the occurrence of involuntary (spontaneous) episodic memories.为什么我现在会记得这个?预测非自愿(自发)情景记忆的发生。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):426-44. doi: 10.1037/a0029128. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
2
The unpredictable past: spontaneous autobiographical memories outnumber autobiographical memories retrieved strategically.不可预测的过去:自发的自传体记忆比策略性检索的自传体记忆多。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1842-6. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
3
Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind.元意识、知觉分离和游离的思维。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;15(7):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
4
Involuntary autobiographical memories in dysphoric mood: a laboratory study.抑郁心境下的非自愿自传体记忆:一项实验室研究。
Memory. 2011 May;19(4):331-45. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.568495.
5
Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering.功能磁共振成像期间的经验抽样揭示了默认网络和执行系统对思维游荡的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8719-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900234106. Epub 2009 May 11.
6
When attention matters: the curious incident of the wandering mind.当注意力至关重要时:心不在焉的离奇事件。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1144-50. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1144.
7
Involuntary autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: how different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories?实验室内外的非自主性自传体记忆:它们与自主性自传体记忆有何不同?
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):920-32. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.920.
8
Involuntary (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future.非自愿(自发)的对过去和未来的心理时光旅行。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1093-104. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.001.
9
Priming involuntary autobiographical memories.启动非自愿自传体记忆
Memory. 2005 Nov;13(8):874-84. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000485.
10
The episodic nature of involuntary autobiographical memories.非自愿自传体记忆的 episodic 性质。(这里“episodic”可能在特定医学语境中有更专业准确的对应中文术语,需结合专业知识进一步确定,暂直译为“episodic”)
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jul;32(5):789-803. doi: 10.3758/bf03195869.

改变非自愿自传体记忆的频率和特征。

Modifying the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories.

机构信息

Department of NEUROFARBA-Section of Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 9;9(4):e89582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089582. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0089582
PMID:24717536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3981656/
Abstract

Recent studies have shown that involuntary autobiographical memories (IAMs) can be elicited in the laboratory. Here we assessed whether the specific instructions given to participants can change the nature of the IAMs reported, in terms of both their frequency and their characteristics. People were either made or not made aware that the aim of the study was to examine IAMs. They reported mental contents either whenever they became aware of them or following a predetermined schedule. Both making people aware of the aim of the study and following a fixed schedule of interruptions increased significantly the number of IAMs reported. When aware of the aim of the study, participants reported more specific memories that had been retrieved and rehearsed more often in the past. These findings demonstrate that the number and characteristics of memories depend on the procedure used. Explanations of these effects and their implications for research on IAMs are discussed.

摘要

最近的研究表明,非自愿自传体记忆(IAM)可以在实验室中引发。在这里,我们评估了向参与者提供的特定说明是否可以改变报告的 IAM 的性质,无论是在频率还是特征方面。人们要么意识到研究的目的是检查 IAM,要么没有意识到。他们要么随时报告他们意识到的心理内容,要么按照预定的时间表报告。让人们意识到研究的目的并按照固定的中断时间表进行操作,都会显著增加报告的 IAM 数量。当参与者意识到研究的目的时,他们报告了更多过去检索和排练次数更多的特定记忆。这些发现表明,记忆的数量和特征取决于所使用的程序。讨论了这些效应的解释及其对 IAM 研究的影响。