Suppr超能文献

日常生活中使用文本和语音报告自传体记忆的差异。

Differences in autobiographical memories reported using text and voice during everyday life.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, United States.

Department of Music, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Memory. 2023 Mar;31(3):393-405. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2162084. Epub 2023 Jan 7.

Abstract

Autobiographical memories frequently occur during everyday life. One of the most common approaches to measuring memories in everyday life is a diary method: Participants record memories as they occur by writing down these memories in a paper diary or typing them on a smartphone. Conversely, many laboratory-based studies of autobiographical memory require participants to describe their memories out loud in a spoken manner. Here, we sought to directly compare memories recorded via typing to those spoken out loud in a smartphone diary study. Participants reported or, autobiographical memories that occurred over a period of four days either by typing (= 43) or recording themselves orally describing memories ( = 39) using a smartphone app. Results indicated that the audio recording group reported memories more frequently and these memories contained a greater number of words, while the text group reported memories more promptly after they occurred. Additionally, the typing group reported memories that were episodically richer and contained a greater proportion of perceptual details. This work has important implications for future autobiographical memory studies in the lab, online, and using diary methods, and suggests that certain reporting modalities may be advantageous depending on the specific research focus.

摘要

自传体记忆在日常生活中经常出现。衡量日常生活中记忆的最常见方法之一是日记法:参与者通过在纸质日记中写下或在智能手机上打字来记录发生的记忆。相反,许多基于实验室的自传体记忆研究要求参与者以口语方式大声描述他们的记忆。在这里,我们试图在智能手机日记研究中直接比较通过打字记录的记忆和通过口头说出的记忆。参与者通过打字(=43)或使用智能手机应用程序口头描述记忆(=39)来报告或记录在四天内发生的自传体记忆。结果表明,音频记录组更频繁地报告记忆,并且这些记忆包含更多的单词,而文本组在记忆发生后更迅速地报告记忆。此外,打字组报告的记忆情节更丰富,包含更多的感知细节。这项工作对未来在实验室、在线和使用日记方法进行自传体记忆研究具有重要意义,并表明某些报告方式可能取决于特定的研究重点而具有优势。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Intention and Monitoring Influence the Content of Memory Reports.意图和监测会影响记忆报告的内容。
Psychol Rep. 2023 Apr;126(2):918-945. doi: 10.1177/00332941211048736. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Priming involuntary autobiographical memories in the lab.在实验室中启动非自愿性自传体记忆。
Memory. 2018 Feb;26(2):277-289. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1353102. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
Music evokes vivid autobiographical memories.音乐唤起生动的自传式记忆。
Memory. 2016 Aug;24(7):979-89. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1061012. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验