• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

易哭倾向量表的编制:易哭倾向、同理心、依恋与年龄之间的关联

Development of the Crying Proneness Scale: associations among crying proneness, empathy, attachment, and age.

作者信息

Denckla Christy A, Fiori Katherine L, Vingerhoets Ad J J M

机构信息

a Gordon F. Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies , Adelphi University.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2014;96(6):619-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.899498. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2014.899498
PMID:24730588
Abstract

Crying is a unique form of human emotional expression that is associated with both positive and negative evocative antecedents. This article investigates the psychometric properties of a newly developed Crying Proneness Scale by examining the factor structure, test-retest reliability, and theoretically hypothesized relationships with empathy, attachment, age, and gender. Based on an analysis of data provided by a Dutch panel (Time 1: N = 4,916, Time 2: N = 4,874), exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses suggest that crying proneness is a multidimensional construct best characterized by four factors called attachment tears, societal tears, sentimental/moral tears, and compassionate tears. Test-retest reliability of the scale was adequate and associations with age, gender, empathy, and attachment demonstrated expected relations. Results suggest that this scale can be used to measure crying proneness, and that it will be useful in future studies that aim to gain a better understanding of normal and pathological socioemotional development.

摘要

哭泣是人类情感表达的一种独特形式,与积极和消极的唤起性前因都有关联。本文通过研究一个新开发的哭泣倾向量表的因子结构、重测信度以及与同理心、依恋、年龄和性别的理论假设关系,来探究该量表的心理测量特性。基于对一个荷兰样本提供的数据(时间1:N = 4916,时间2:N = 4874)的分析,探索性和验证性因子分析表明,哭泣倾向是一个多维结构,最能由四个因子来表征,即依恋性眼泪、社会性眼泪、情感/道德性眼泪和同情性眼泪。该量表的重测信度足够,且与年龄、性别、同理心和依恋的关联呈现出预期的关系。结果表明,这个量表可用于测量哭泣倾向,并且在未来旨在更好地理解正常和病理性社会情感发展的研究中将很有用。

相似文献

1
Development of the Crying Proneness Scale: associations among crying proneness, empathy, attachment, and age.易哭倾向量表的编制:易哭倾向、同理心、依恋与年龄之间的关联
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(6):619-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.899498. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
Holding Back the Tears: Individual Differences in Adult Crying Proneness Reflect Attachment Orientation and Attitudes to Crying.忍住泪水:成年人哭泣倾向的个体差异反映了依恋取向和对哭泣的态度。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 6;7:1003. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01003. eCollection 2016.
3
Social and psychological consequences of not crying: possible associations with psychopathology and therapeutic relevance.不哭的社会和心理后果:与精神病理学的可能关联及其治疗相关性。
CNS Spectr. 2018 Dec;23(6):414-422. doi: 10.1017/S1092852917000141. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
4
Do mood disorders alter crying? A pilot investigation.情绪障碍会改变哭泣吗?一项初步调查。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(5):E9-15. doi: 10.1002/da.20331.
5
Does crying help? Development of the beliefs about crying scale (BACS).哭泣有帮助吗?哭泣信念量表(BACS)的编制。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Jun;33(4):722-736. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1488243. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
6
Nostalgia proneness and empathy: Generality, underlying mechanism, and implications for prosocial behavior.怀旧倾向与同理心:普遍性、潜在机制及对亲社会行为的影响。
J Pers. 2020 Jun;88(3):485-500. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12505. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
7
Psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) Scale.意大利语版亲密关系经历量表修订版(ECR-R)的心理测量特性。
Psychol Rep. 2014 Jun;114(3):785-801. doi: 10.2466/03.21.PR0.114k23w9. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
8
Children's perceptions and comforting strategies to infant crying: relations to age, sex, and empathy-related responding.儿童对婴儿哭泣的感知和安慰策略:与年龄、性别和同理心相关反应的关系。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;29(Pt 3):524-51. doi: 10.1348/026151010X521475. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
9
Do therapists cry in therapy? The role of experience and other factors in therapists' tears.治疗师在治疗中会哭泣吗?经验和其他因素在治疗师流泪中的作用。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2013 Jun;50(2):224-34. doi: 10.1037/a0031384. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
10
Attachment linked predictors of women's emotional and cognitive responses to infant distress.与依恋相关的预测因素对女性对婴儿痛苦的情绪和认知反应的影响。
Attach Hum Dev. 2006 Mar;8(1):11-32. doi: 10.1080/14616730600594450.

引用本文的文献

1
The power of tears: Observers' brain responses show that tears provide unambiguous signals independent of scene context.眼泪的力量:观察者的大脑反应表明,眼泪能提供独立于场景背景的明确信号。
Neuroimage Rep. 2022 Jun 4;2(3):100105. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100105. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Crying in psychotherapy: an exploratory mixed-methods study on forms of emotional crying and associated therapeutic interventions.心理治疗中的哭泣:一项关于情感哭泣形式及相关治疗干预措施的探索性混合方法研究。
Res Psychother. 2024 Apr 17;27(1):725. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.725.
3
Pathologic tearfulness after limbic encephalitis: A novel disorder and its neural basis.
边缘性脑炎后病理性哭泣:一种新的疾病及其神经基础。
Neurology. 2020 Mar 24;94(12):e1320-e1335. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008934. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
The Relationship of Gender Roles and Beliefs to Crying in an International Sample.国际样本中性别角色和信念与哭泣的关系。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 10;10:2288. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02288. eCollection 2019.
5
Empathy and Close Social Ties in Late Life.晚年的同理心和亲密的社会关系。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Sep 14;75(8):1648-1657. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz044.
6
The Riddle of Human Emotional Crying: A Challenge for Emotion Researchers.人类情感哭泣之谜:对情感研究者的一项挑战。
Emot Rev. 2016 Jul;8(3):207-217. doi: 10.1177/1754073915586226. Epub 2015 May 28.
7
Tears Falling on Goosebumps: Co-occurrence of Emotional Lacrimation and Emotional Piloerection Indicates a Psychophysiological Climax in Emotional Arousal.泪洒鸡皮疙瘩:情绪性流泪与情绪性竖毛同时出现表明情绪唤起时的心理生理高潮。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 7;8:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00041. eCollection 2017.
8
Holding Back the Tears: Individual Differences in Adult Crying Proneness Reflect Attachment Orientation and Attitudes to Crying.忍住泪水:成年人哭泣倾向的个体差异反映了依恋取向和对哭泣的态度。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 6;7:1003. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01003. eCollection 2016.